Skip to main content

Farmers alarmed at proposed laws threatening traditional seeds and biodiversity

By A Representative 
Farmer groups and civil society organizations across India have raised strong objections to the government’s proposed amendments to the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights (PPVFR) Act, 2001, and voiced concern over the yet-to-be-released Seed Bill. They allege that the proposed changes threaten farmers’ rights, seed sovereignty, and national control over India’s genetic resources. 
The protests come as India prepares for negotiations at the upcoming Governing Body Meeting of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA), scheduled in Peru from November 24 to 29, 2025, where proposals are expected to expand international access to all plant genetic resources and their Digital Sequence Information (DSI).
Critics argue that the amendments align more with the interests of multinational agribusinesses than those of Indian farmers, potentially eroding national sovereignty and agricultural self-reliance. The inclusion of “synthetic seeds” in the new Seed Bill has sparked additional alarm, with farmer groups warning that it could pave the way for genetically modified or engineered crops, threatening both the integrity of traditional seed systems and ecological health.
The Bharat Beej Swaraj Manch (BBSM), a national alliance of farmers and seed savers, has accused the government of prioritizing corporate interests over farmers in recent stakeholder consultations organized by the PPVFR Authority. They contend that the process lacked transparency and excluded farmer voices until the final stages. BBSM has also criticized India’s failure to maintain a registry of “Varieties of Common Knowledge” — traditional seed varieties that should be protected from private ownership — and demanded immediate corrective measures.
Farmer networks have called on the government to halt the proposed PPVFR amendments, disclose the full contents of the Seed Bill, and ensure that any legislative changes strengthen rather than weaken farmers’ rights. They also demand the protection of all plant genetic resources and their DSI from intellectual property claims, and a full audit of the Gene Fund.
Warning against the ongoing corporatization of global agriculture, the groups emphasized that over half of the world’s seed trade is already dominated by four major multinational corporations, and India should not surrender its heritage of biodiversity and seed sovereignty to external control. 
BBSM and allied organizations are mobilizing nationwide campaigns to demand transparency, public consultations, and the upholding of India’s long-standing commitment to farmers’ rights and biodiversity conservation.

Comments

TRENDING

Can free‑living Indian street dogs teach us about how to care for pet dogs?

By Daniel Ramp, Kapil Vishwas Patwardhan, Rosalie Chapple  We give our pet dogs shelter, veterinary care, affection, training and play. We decide when they eat, where they sleep, when they go outside, who they meet, and how they move through the world.

100,000 dead, 4 million displaced: Myanmar's post-coup war grinds on as the junta loses ground

By Nava Thakuria*  At least 100,000 people, including civilians, have been killed in Myanmar's conflicts since the military coup of 1 February 2021, according to the UN. Kelley Anne Eckels-Currie, UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in Myanmar, gave the figure to the UN General Assembly in New York on 27 October 2026. She called President Min Aung Hlaing a tyrant who still deliberately attacks civilians to force them into submission.

Stop selling the golden goose to foreigners: People's Commission on IDBI deal

Counterview News   The People's Commission on Public Sector and Public Services has demanded that the Centre immediately stop the sale of IDBI Bank to Fairfax, a Canadian company. In a detailed statement titled "Stop selling the golden goose to foreigners – Stop IDBI sale to Fairfax", the Commission said the deal is opaque, legally questionable and against the Constitution's Directive Principles.