Skip to main content

Mandodari Devi's struggle for grazing land versus 'dark reality' of Chipko movement

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
In the border district of Chamoli in Uttarakhand, a powerful action by Mandodari Devi to protect her meadows and grazing land has surely brought back the memories of Chipko resistance. Mandodari Devi fought with CISF jawans who tried to stop her accessing the village Helang’s charagah or what is termed as common property resource and snatched her fodder which she had collected from the meadow.
The police women caught hold of her, put her in the police vehicle along with her sister-in-law and daughter-in-law. Her four-year-old grandchild too was detained along with her and taken to Joshimath, about eight kilometres from their village, where they were made to sit for nearly six hours without any food or water and let off after they were fined Rs 250 for their encroachment.
The battle of Mandodari Devi remains unending despite initial successes of government acknowledging her ‘right over access to forest and its produce’, but it has ignited the spirit of the people in the state against the gross misuse of the natural resources in the name of ‘development’.
It also reflects the dark reality of the much-acknowledged Chipko movement, which was hailed as protection of environment, but the fact of the matter is, it was a movement for ‘resource right’. The result of the ‘success’ of Chipko was that people lost their ‘traditional’ and ‘natural’ rights over the forests.
The story of Mandodari Devi is reflection of the belief that where people nurture forests or meadows the latter nurture them and their cattle. It is the mutual relationship of nature and human being, which is complimentary, but it is now under the threat from those who are being ‘facilitated’ to bring ‘development’ to the Himalayan state Uttarakhand.
On July 15, a video went viral on social media showing an old woman with green fodder on her back being stopped by several CISF jawans. They were asking the woman to stop and hand over her grass fodder to them. The woman, a true pahadi, was not ready to give in to the demand of these officers. Finally, two women constable caught hold of her and put her in the police jeep along with her grand daughter, who is about four-years old, and her sister-in-law and daughter.
The matter would have ended, but the fight by Mandodari Devi, supported by local activist Atul Sati, raised the issue in the media, which was forced to give the other side of the story. The administration as usual came out with a narrative that this woman and her family were trying to encroach a ‘government land’, where the Tehri Hydro Development Corporation (THDC), a public sector company involved in developing various other ‘hydro’ projects in Uttarakhand.
The issue raised people’s sentiments in the state. They came out strongly, as it was an attempt to humiliate a local woman by the police and the forest personnel. In the next few days the district administration made the story look like as if the woman, and the community to which she belongs, Ghasiyaris, traditional fodder collectors for their cattle, and her family were trying to ‘grab’ the village common land where THDC was planning to make a playground for the village people.
The district administration used the village pradhan/sarpanch to speak against Mandodari Devi and her family for attempting to disrupt the ‘developmental’ work in village Helang. This was rather shocking, as a small incident led the entire administration came down to defame a local woman, who is a widow and actually was protecting the common property resources of her village.
The incident outraged the people of Uttarakhand and social activists, intellectuals and other civil society organisations and individuals joined hand to participate in a call 'Helang Chalo' on July 24 in support of the Ghasiyaris. This led many of the district administration officers to visit the house of Mandodari Devi and appreciate her concerns for the forest conservation.
Chamoli district is the border district of India with China and most of the communities engaged in seasonal migration here are tribal. Till 1964, the community at the border had frequent interaction with their Tibetan counterparts as trade was open. The tribal community protected and nurtured forest and forest produce.
Government order of Jan 27, 2014 asked district officials to ensure against usage of pasture land for any purpose other than grazing
After the 1964 war with China the biggest jolt happened was closure of the border. Many villages were shifted elsewhere and the trade with Tibet was completely stopped. The government focussed on building better road networks for enabling the army to develop its infrastructure in the border area, which resulted in land acquisition.
The crisis in Uttarakhand is that there is very little agricultural land as most of the hill districts like Chamoli, Rudraprayag, Uttarkashi, Tehari, Pauri in the Garhwal division as well as Pithauragarh, Bageshwar, Nainital, Champavat in the Kumaon area have more forest land, which has often created issues with the people.
These districts are located in forest zones and hence lives of the people have become difficult, because the forest bureaucracy does not allow the local people, who protected the forests, to access forests where they live, but raise no objection when massive areas are encroached upon or given for the ‘developmental’ purposes to private or public sector companies.

Mandodari Devi’s struggle and Chipko

Mandodari Devi and her family have been opposing the attempt by THDC to take over the only pasture land in her village. This was in clear violation of the government order January 27, 2014, signed by Revenue Commissioner and Secretary PS Jangpangi ordering all the district magistrate and revenue officers to ensure that the usage or transfer of the pasture land or gauchar for any other purpose than grazing was declared invalid by the Supreme Court.
Mandodari Devi wrote a letter to the authorities to protect the ‘charagah’ or grazing land of her village. The view was floated that that no other ‘villagers’ were with her and that she was the only family trying to create obstacle for ‘development’ of the villages where the company wanted to make a play ground for the children. However, Mandodari Devi argued that it is her family alone which keeps cattle as most of the other villagers have migrated and do not keep cattle. So, her concern was to protect the meadows meant for the village.
The incident has brought back the memory of the Chipko movement, which claimed to protect the ‘environment’ and preserve the ‘green’. However, it ignored the vital issue of local communities. Most of its leaders, who became famous, were actually not tribal but were from privileged communities who appropriated the struggle and popular success of the movement and negotiated with the state on behalf of the ‘people’ and talked to the same person who felt it’s a ‘regional’ issue.
The political leadership, cunning and crafty, converted their ‘defeat’ into victory. The historic fight of Gaura Devi and other powerful women of the tribal communities in the Dhauli Valley, in and around Raini village, isn’t even recalled today. The then chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, HN Bahuguna, himself hailing from Uttarakhand, at one point termed Chipko as ‘manifestation of narrow regionalism’, as Himalaya belonged to the whole country and not just to a few villages in Uttarakhand.
Bahuguna’s opposition to the Chipko movement was well known but he was a crafty politician, expert in breaking the opponents. In December 1973 he called a meeting with Chipko leaders leaders like Sundar Lal Bahuguna, Chandi Prasad Bhatt, Devaki Nandan Pandey and Jangi Lal Shah Bandhu. It had no representation of tribals who had built the movement.
A new forest policy was floated in Uttar Pradesh, which handed over the forest management to the Uttar Pradesh Van Nigam (Forest Corporation), and in the name of protecting environment, the local communities were denied their right over the resources, while the corporations continued to exploit the forests.
The crisis that we are facing today has a direct relationship with glamorisation of ‘Chipko’ movement which left the locals isolated while a few others got name and fame at the cost of the communities. It is a crisis when environmental questions are discussed exclusively as an ‘expert’ domain leaving communities completely out of the debates and discussion.
Last winter, when I travelled to Dhauli valley and visited Raini and Lata villages and met various people, I realised as what exactly has ‘Chipko’ given to the communities. I was shocked to hear from former head of the Gram Sabha Raini Chak Lata village and important member of Chipko movement Dhan Singh Rana now turning a harsh critique of it.
I could sense his deep sense of anguish and pain. Dhan Singh is deeply anguished and pained at the double talk and duplicity of those taking ‘decisions’ about them without any involvement of the local people. “Mera chulhe jalane se Himalay pighlega nahi”, he says. (The Himalayas will not melt just because I am cooking on a chulha or stove).
The Dhauli Ganga-Rishi Ganga tragedy is making of our own, he says. How can the glacier explode when it is the freezing time, he asks? The time when water freezes everywhere in the mountains as it become snowy then what is the reason of a glacial burst. Somewhere we have heated it. When our water gets frozen in our pans then how is it possible that a glacial burst after all it happens in summer? All this is our doing.
The widespread public condemnation of the police action on Mandodari Devi and others in Helang has sent a warning to the state government to actually look into the issues of natural resources, forest and water in close connection with the native people of Uttarakhand.
Already, there is huge resentment against the land policies of the government which has removed land ceiling in many areas, particularly in the Tarai region. The amended land laws help outsiders to buy land at the prime locations. The Helang incident has shown that how laws are being used to criminalise local communities without caring for the sentiments of the people.
If the political class including the ruling party really want to honour the sentiments of Uttarakhand then it must be protective the Pahadi identity, which includes protection, preservation and respect of the Himalayas, its diverse forest ranges, biodiversity and beautiful rivers as they are our civilisation and without them we can’t imagine Uttarakhand.
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Kailash Satyarthi NGO makes slum kids laud RSS founder Hedgewar as freedom fighter

By Rajiv Shah  In a move which may raise many an eyebrow, a Nobel laureate Kailash Satyarthi-supported child rights NGO has celebrated Prime Minister Narendra Modi-intitiated Har Ghar Tiranga by commemorating 75 freedom fighters by "narrating their famous deeds and chanting slogans of each leader", including Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhas Chandra Bose, Lala Lajpat Rai and a person who had little or nothing common with the freedom movement -- RSS founder Keshav Baliram Hedgewar. A communique from the Kailash Satyarthi Childrens Foundation (KSCF), which organised the event, said among the freedom fighters celebrated by 75 children on the occasion of 75 years of India's independence placing photographs of each freedom fighter included that of Hedgewar, who is alleged to have maintained a distance from Indian Independence movement led by Gandhiji. According to Hedgewar's biography, when Gandhiji launched the Salt Satyagraha in 1930, Hedgewar sent information ev

Savarkar in Ahmedabad 'declared' two-nation theory in 1937, Jinnah followed 3 years later

By Our Representative One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

Unlike other revolutionaries, Hindutva icon wrote 5 mercy petitions to British masters

By Shamsul Islam*  The Hindutva icon VD Savarkar of the RSS-BJP rulers of India submitted not one, two,or three but five mercy petitions to the British masters! Savarkarites argue: “There are no evidences to prove that Savarkar collaborated with the British for his release from jail. In fact, his appeal for release was a ruse. He was well aware of the political developments outside and wanted to be part of it. So he kept requesting for his release. But the British authorities did not trust him a bit” (YD Phadke, ‘A complex Hero’, "The Indian Expres"s, August 31, 2004)

Golwalkar's views on tricolour, martyrs, minorities, caste as per RSS archives

By Shamsul Islam*  First time in the history of independent India, the in-charge minister of the Cultural Ministry in the current Modi government, Prahlad Singh Patel, has glorified MS Golwalkar, second supremo of the RSS and the most prominent ideologue of the RSS till date, on his birth anniversary, February 19. In a tweet he wrote : “Remembering a great thinker, scholar, and remarkable leader #MSGolwalkar on his birth anniversary. His thoughts will remain a source of inspiration & continue to guide generations.”

Gujarat's 'low-key' communalism: right-wing groups compete for anti-Muslim space

By Rajiv Shah  Noticing the emergence of a novel trend, a just-released report based on a fact-finding team's observations following its interaction in particular with Hindu and Muslim political activists, administrators and police officials, has claimed that a major reason why chasm between the two communities in Gujarat has lately reached new heights is, a veritable competition between Hindu right-wing groups and leaders to capture the existing communal space. Titled "Hindu Right, Communal Riots and Demolitions: Emerging Pattern of Communal Riots in India", the report has been prepared against the backdrop of what it calls "low intensity" communalism which has characterised rioting in Gujarat in the recent past, especially after the 2002 communal carnage, one of the worst in Independent India. Especially focusing on riots in two Gujarat towns, Himmatnagar and Khambhat, which took place on April 10, the day clashes broke also out in different parts of India on

Gujarat govt 'contradicts' MHA memo while freeing Bilkis Bano gangrape convicts

By Our Representative  The All-India Progressive Women's Association (AIPWA) has said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah "must answer for the decision to free Bilkis Bano's gang rapists." In a statement, AIPWA has wondered, "What was the basis of the Gujarat Government’s decision to free those men on August 15, 2022, to celebrate what the PM Modi calls India’s Amrit Kaal? Was remission and freedom a reward for rape and murder of Muslims?" The statement comes amidst an Ahmedabad-based legal rights non-pofit, which took up the cause of Bilkis Bano and fought her case right up to the Supreme Court, Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), suggesting that the Gujarat government move to allow remission to the convicts contradicts the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) Guidelines for Granting Special Remission to Prisoners on August 15, 2022 (75th anniversary of Independence), January 26, 2023, and again on August 15, 2023. Citing the MHA notificat

Need to ask at today's 'critical juncture' of India's history: Whose Freedom@75?

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  The official propaganda states that: “Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav is an initiative of the Government of India to celebrate and commemorate 75 years of independence and the glorious history of it's people, culture and achievements. This Mahotsav is dedicated to the people of India who have not only been instrumental in bringing India thus far in its evolutionary journey but also hold within them the power and potential to enable Prime Minister Narendra Modi's vision of activating India 2.0, fuelled by the spirit of Aatmanirbhar Bharat. The official journey of Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav commenced on 12th March 2021 which started a 75-week countdown to our 75th anniversary of independence and will end post a year on 15th August 2023.” So as India completes a landmark seventy-five years of freedom – a platinum jubilee – the only question one needs to ask at this critical juncture of the country’s history is “whose freedom@75?” Since March 2020, it has been a di

Har ghar tiranga: will the hungry bellies raise their hand to unfurl the national flag?

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  Indians are going to unfurl the tricolour to celebrate the 75th anniversary of India's Independence on 15th of August 2022. Indian freedom struggle has not only shaped India as a modern constitutional democracy but also shaped the nature of state, society and citizenship. The anti-colonial, anti-capitalist, anti-feudal and anti-imperialist struggle were the four pillars of Indian freedom struggle that laid the foundation of a sovereign nation state promised to pursue a society based on socialist, scientific and secular values to ensure egalitarian citizenship rights without any form of discrimination. These inalienable values are central to the unity, integrity, peace, prosperity and progress of India as a multicultural society and secular state. It is time to celebrate these values and promises of Indian independence, a product of struggles and sacrifice of millions of working-class people across the country. India at 75 is still a young nation but old e

RSS, Sangh Parivar consider tricolour as "state flag" and not "national flag"

By Teesta Setalvad* Today, when the nation has been independent for 67 years, the Sangh Parivar is set to launch ‘Tiranga yatras’ and Satyagrahas to defend the honour of the flag and the nation. Yet when the Indian people were involved in the decades-long struggle for freedom against British imperialism, the RSS was conspicuous by its absence in the struggle. When thousands of people faced lathis, bullets and jail sentences for hoisting the tiranga and participated all over the country in satyagraha during the Civil Disobedience and Quit India movements against the British Raj, the Sangh publicly took the stand that it would not take part in the movement and seldom missed the opportunity of assuring the British rulers that they would keep to the right side of colonial law and avoid any clash with the authorities. Of course the reason given for this was that the Sangh was secretly strengthening itself and would take on British imperialism only when it was strong enough to do so! A simil