Skip to main content

Demand to ban mainstream, social media for 'glorifying' separatist Assam outfit, Ulfa-I

Ulfa-I leader Paresh Barua
By Nava Thakuria*  
Latest killing of armed members belonging to the banned United Liberation Front of Assam (Independent) or Ulfa-I in their hideouts somewhere along the Myanmar-China border and the subsequent media coverage “glorifying” the brutal acts of separatist Ulfa-I leaders appear to have annoyed several sections in the northeast.
There was live streaming of militant leaders by many satellite news channels, which many interpreted as justifying the murder of Assamese youths in camps. Based on this interpretation, there is now a strong demand to restrict the media outlets which allegedly propagate the culture of violence in the name of freedom movement.
The Assam Public Works (APW), which calls itself anti-militancy organization, has criticised the news channels which interviewed top Ulfa-I leader Paresh Barua, giving him the opportunity to explain why they killed at least two cadres in recent days.
Addressing media in Guwahati, APW president Aabhijeet Sharma said that he was planning to approach the Gauhati High Court to ban both the mainstream and social media outlets of the region in that he called their “unwanted initiative to admire the armed militants for disrupting activities.”
Things surfaced after Ulfa-I leaders announced in the first week of May 2022 that they had ‘executed’ two cadres, Sanjiv Sarma and Dhanjit Das, in one of their hideouts. In a media statement, the militants claimed that both the newly recruits were involved in anti-outfit activities, and were spying for the police, hence they were given capital punishments.
The outfit, which is fighting for a separate homeland for the Assamese people, claimed that both Sanjiv (hailing from Baihata Chariali near to Guwahati) and Dhanjit (from Barpeta in western Assam) had confessed their crimes. It also released two video clippings where Sanjiv and Dhanjit confessed their crimes and stated that the Ulfa-I is a revolutionary organization. It is suspected that the victims read out the lines under gun points in the camp.
Most of the Assam news channels telecast the videos repeatedly, which created sensation across the state. However, the militants remained silent on handing over the bodies to the respective families as the last respect to the victims. Moreover, the outfit did not issue any supporting photographs (or video clippings) of their ‘execution’.
Born on April 7, 1979 at Sibsagar in eastern Assam, the United Liberation Front of Assam (Ulfa) pledged for an independent homeland for the indigenous people through armed struggle. For decades the militant outfit enjoyed public support with a unified command, but in 2011 there emerged divisions among the leaders on the ground of peace talks with the government.
Many preferred to sit for negotiations, but Barua rejected the idea and formed a different group in 2012. Soon his faction emerged as Ulfa-I to continue the struggle for what he called Swadhin Asom.
Jumping into the controversy, Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, also in charge of state home portfolio, denied that the state police had spies in Ulfa-I. Recently, he attempted negotiations with the Ulfa-I leaders, which recently resulted in unilateral ceasefire by the militants.
State police chief Bhaskar Jyoti Mahanta also denied that his department had sent any spy to the militant camps. In his belated official comment, the DGP said the execution of the two youths, if it turned out to be true, was “inhuman and terrorizing”, taking strong exception to the operation of the judicial organ of the Ulfa-I.
Lately, another casualty has been reported from the Ulfa-I camp, where Biju Gogoi was found dead. The matter came to light after an arrested rebel spoke to the police and claimed that he saw Biju’s body with bullet injuries in a camp inside northern Myanmar. 
Biju was associated with the All-Assam Students' Union and joined the Ulfa-I in 2019 following the uproarious situation due to rigorous protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in the state’s Brahmaputra valley.
According to the police, the arrested rebel claimed that Biju was gunned down by the militants as he tried to escape the camp. As the news spread, Ulfa-I militants came out with the “clarification” that Biju was not executed but he killed himself on February 12 last. 
The militants remained silent on handing over the bodies to the respective families as the last respect to the victims
The family members of Biju, however, wondered, why the militant leaders did not disclose this earlier. Biju’s mother demanded proof that her son had committed suicide by shooting himself in the camp and was not murdered by the militants.
Facing the heat, Barua telephoned Biju’s brother and asserted that the arrested rebel was not a recognized member of their organization, and that the news of his suicide was being spread behalf of the government so that a wrong message goes to the people.
Meanwhile, an organisation claiming to be a forum of nationalist citizens, reacting to the execution of two cadres by Ulfa-I, said this was an act in desperation meant to gather public attention. The Patriotic People’s Front Assam (PPFA), in a media statement, affirmed that the armed outfit had been indulging in crimes (of assassinating thousands of Assamese nationals) for the sake of revolution since its inception in 1979.
PPFA urged the local media outlets to be “responsible” while reporting the issue of militancy, criticising them for live coverage to the militant leaders as if they were doing some heroic work, glorifying the Ulfa-I for their “inhuman activities.” It added, the news anchors hardly questioned the authority of militants to declare someone as traitors for subsequent execution.
Not just news channels, a city media club also tried to accommodate live space to the militant leader with an arranged media interaction last year, which resulted in a police complaint against the Gauhati Press Club office-bearers.
The complainant, Biswajit Nath, a city based scribe, argued that many journalist-members of the press club once stood against the separatist militants to hoist the national Tri-colour in the club premises on every Independence Day and Republic Day. But now it has “spoiled” the spirit of patriotism with an attempt to organize a press interaction with Ulfa-I leaders, who have been “challenging India’s sovereignty and integrity.”
---
*Senior journalist based in Guwahati

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Edgar Snow's objective view of Chinese revolution 'avoided' uncritical support for Maoism

By Harsh Thakor*  As we commemorate the 75th anniversary of the Chinese Revolution, it is essential to reflect on the legacy of Edgar Snow, the first journalist to enter the northwest region known as Red China in 1936. His groundbreaking work brought the narratives of Mao Zedong and his followers to the global stage. A prominent figure in China, Snow was an American journalist celebrated for his 1937 book , "Red Star Over China."