Skip to main content

World Bank proved right, Narmada is already a destructive project: Medha Patkar

By Rajiv Shah 
Narmada Bachao Andolan leader Medha Patkar has said that the World Bank’s independent review mission, which brought out the Morse Commission report, has been proved right: The Sardar Sarovar dam has not only failed to live up to the loud promises made for irrigating large arid areas of Saurashtra and Kutch in Gujarat, those who were displaced and resettled in Gujarat are getting increasingly restive as many of them are unable to get the promised water for irrigation and some for drinking water too.
While 50,000 families have been resettled in three states and 20,000 have received land rights as land or cash, the authorities have not calculated what should be done with 15,000 families, whose houses are acquired for Sardar Sarovar but following changing backwater levels of the Sardar Sarovar dam, they are denied rehabilitation, Patkar tells Counterview in an interview (part1*):
***
Q: What is the latest position in your view as far as the Sardar Sarovar dam is concerned? Has rehabilitation been completed? Has the dam become viable?
A: Out of 30 major and 135 medium dams, Sardar Sarovar is a mega dam which became controversial right up to the World Bank. The World Bank withdrew from this project’s funding because its independent review by the Morse Commission clearly said that it is a destructive project, and it can be completed only through unacceptable means. 
That’s exactly what has happened. We had brought out human rights, democratic rights and natural conservation-related violations. Today it is a fact of life that the displaced population initially shown in the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) was based on what it heard from state actors for full 10 years – a lacuna in the Inter-State Water Dispute Act, 1959. 
We were not heard, the displaced people were not heard, their houses were not visited. The tribunal did not realise that real surveys and basic studies were not completed. When the World Bank appraised the dam to sanction its funding, it was based on huge list of projectised studies. It said, these studies would need to be completed for full implementation. 
When the clearance was given in 1987, it said that studies on rehabilitation, catchment area treatment, command area development, flora and fauna, impact on health and seismicity would be completed in the next two years, by 1989. 
A decade later, in his minority judgment of 2000, contradicting the two judges’ Supreme Court order, Justice Bharucha said that this project was not even planned, insisting on the appointment of an inter-disciplinary panel to study the impacts, and then decide whether the project should go ahead.
Q: But now review of the project is going to take place in 2024…
A: It is review of the Tribunal Award which is scheduled to take place in 2024. But what has happened over the last 24 years? First of all, because of the 36 year-long-struggle, rehabilitation with alternative land as per the tribunal-defined eligibility, has helped resettle 50,000 families in three states, of which have 20,000 families, including Adivasi, hill area and plain area families, have received land, while the rest have got monetary compensation, mainly in Madhya Pradesh. 
However, even today, the resettlement sites still have many inadequacies. Amenities have not been fully constructed. Besides, the rehabilitation with land or houses of 1,000 or more families is still pending.
Q: In which states?
A: In Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Gujarat. In Gujarat, of course, there are fewer families which are yet to get land, though many find that their land is not cultivable and amenities have been fully provided. In Madhya Pradesh, there are hundreds of families who are yet to get Rs 60 lakh instead of land as per the Supreme Court judgment of 2017. Many of the women land holders’ rehabilitation is still pending. Some of the cases are pending in the Supreme Court and are not coming up for hearing. 
In Maharashtra, the process has gone ahead, yet, hundreds are yet to get land. A few days back we warned to the Nardurbar district collector that we would have to begin agitation if land is not allocated. Then there are potters, boatsmen, artisans and shopkeepers who existed in every village. They have not got land for livelihood or other benefits as per government policy.
Over and above this, a new issue has been added: assessment of backwater level of Narmada. Around 15,000 families of Madhya Pradesh have been displaced after their property has been acquired. Their houses are transferred in the name of the Narmada authority in Madhya Pradesh. They remain excluded from the benefit of rehabilitation since backwater levels were suddenly changed in 2010. 
Q: What is the position in Gujarat, in your view?
A: In Gujarat, most of those who were displaced were Adivasis. There were only 17 shopkeepers, all from the Bohra community. Apart from those who belonging to Gujarat, about 700-800 families from Maharashtra have been rehabilitated in Gujarat. From Madhya Pradesh, around 5,500 have been rehabilitated in Gujarat. 
In Gujarat, there are about 400 rehabilitation sites, which continue of have huge problems. In Akota site, in a recent meeting, people complained of lack of drinking water. They feel betrayed. Mobile dispensaries have been discontinued. The authorities gave money for housing and bullocks, but there has been no plan to provide alternative livelihood. 
At many places the land which the displaced families got is not irrigable. They need to make heavy investment on it. Those who sold this land to the oustees gave it away because agriculture on the land was unprofitable. 
The Gujarat government and the Grievance Redressal Authority (GRA) under two retired judges do nothing to help those who complain. GRA is found to hand over issues that come before it to the Sardar Sarovar Rehabilitation Agency, and the agency promises it would bring about about a solution within 70 days. But when nothing happens, people get tired. Many problems and grievances remain unresolved over years. 
Then, there is the issue of canal affected people, We struggled, did padyatra, only after this a Government Resolution (GR) was issued offering half hectare of land to each canal affected family. But the GR has not been implemented. Hardly anyone has got half hectare. The canal affected got cash compensation which was very meagre and couldn't compensate for real loss. 
As for the villages situated next to the canals, they are not allowed to lift water from the canals because of the fear that the canal would crack. The resettlement sites situated at the tail end of the canal network area are at a loss, as the original settlers nearer to the Narmada canal are more powerful compared to the resettled ones. They take away most of the water on the way depriving the oustees. There is violation of the Tribunal Award that stipulated rehabilitation in the command area of the Narmada dam, with irrigation. 
Q: So is Narmada dividing people?
A: Yes. It’s a conflict between the established and the displaced… But it is also true that whatever the resettled families have got, it is because of our struggle. Other project affected people have got nothing or very little, whether it was Panam, Hathmati, Mahi-Kadana or any other dam of Gujarat. But the full implementation of the NWDT award, and of the Supreme Court judgments of 2000, 2005 and 2017, has still not happened. Hence, we will have to continue our struggle. 
 Narmada canal in Kutch: not in use
Now there is new displacement. Sardar Patel has tears in his eyes: In the name of his statue, which has been installed at the cost of more than Rs 3,000 crore, tourism is being promoted. The six villages, which were the first to be affected by setting up of the Kevadia colony in 1961 for constructing the dam, were given compensation to tune of just Rs 200 for the destruction of their standing crop. 
Houses of 15,000 families of Madhya Pradesh have been acquired but are excluded from rehabilitation because of change in backwater levels
After a lot of struggle, Rs 35,000 – Rs 7,000 per acre for five acres – was announced. Except for five or six old people, nobody took that money. In 2013, a GR was put out to provide land against land to those who were affected by the initial displacement due to the project colony. But after Narendra Modi became Prime Minister in 2014, this was forgotten. 
The authorities want to develop tourism on Adivasi lands not just of these six villages but also 72 other villages in the surrounding areas. In Vaghodia, for instance, there is a plan to build a hotel. The land was taken in the name of Sardar Sarovar. Under the law, if the land is put to reuse for any other purpose, it should be reacquired under the 2013 land acquisition Act, which replaced the colonial 1894 law following our struggle from Narmada to Nandigram and due to an aware minister Jairam Ramesh. 
Under the 2013 law, any acquisition, whether it is for tourism, or for canal, Social Impact Assessment, Environment Impact Assessment and gram sabha consent are necessary. But this is not happening. They want to uproot Adivasi villages. It is an anti-Adivasi approach. The river, the jungle, the whole ecosystem were in the hands of Adivasis, who preserved these over generations, but  and are being snatched away now.
Q: Is there any fresh effort to reassess the rehabilitation process?
A: There is the 2019 Supreme Court, which says that four Chief Ministers' (Gujarat, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan) Review Committee should expeditiously meeting to find out the status of rehabilitation, and whether the decision to fill up the water to the full reservoir level in the Sardar Sarovar dam was correct. For one year there was no meeting – till the fall of the Kamal Nath government in Madhya Pradesh. When the meeting took place, only Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray put forward the correct position and challenged Gujarat as well as the Centre. 
Today, Madhya Pradesh is demanding Rs 8,000 crore, which includes Rs 7000 crore as reimbursement for what they have spent for the Sardar Sarovar project, and another Rs 1000 crore for the pending work. If the work is still pending, who gave the permission in 2014 to raise the dam, and in 2017 to close the dam’s gates? Wasn't that unlawful and unjust?
Q: What about the cost benefit? Has it come true? 
A: Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh are not getting their share of the power produced at the dam’s hydro power units – 27% and 56% respectively. Now, Madhya Pradesh is demanding Rs 900 crore and Maharashtra about Rs 400 crore as compensation. If you had to exchange money only what was the point of having the dam and destruction on such a large scale? 
Q: What about Kutch and Saurashtra? Will they get water?
A: The dam was built in the name of providing water to the arid zones of Kutch and Saurashtra. Planning was for 18 lakh hectares. Former BJP chief minister Suresh Mehta’s article exposes it. Only one third of the beneficiary area of Gujarat, or a little more than that, is being irrigated. 
There is no minor canal network in Kutch even now. In Kutch the main branch takes water to Adani’s thermal power plant, not even to the Tatas’ thermal power plant. They are also giving water to other industries and some cities in Kutch. But what about the promise to irrigate Kutch land drinking water to all villages in that district? 
Modi said before the Supreme Court judges on November 26, the Constitution Day, that because of the agitation against Narmada, things could not move. It is the Supreme Court which stopped the work. It said that you cannot raise the height of the dam till rehabilitation and the environment compensatory measures are completed. 
Recently, a consultant was appointed to find out whether it is possible to have minor canal network in Kutch’s arid zone, whether it would not affect environment. It is a command area development issue. Clearly, what the World Bank's independent review commission said decades ago is proving to be correct. They only funded for up to one fifth of the canal network and the dam but later withdrew. Now canals are showing cracks, there is waterlogging, salination, seepage and breaches too...
Q: What about Saurashtra?
A: In Saurashtra, cities and industries are getting water. The tribunal allocated 1.6 million acre feet (MAF) out of the allocation to Gujarat, 9 MAF, to cities and industries. But this has gone up to 2-2.5 MAF. Experience suggests, centralised water management benefits industries and cities and not the real needy drought affected and drought prone areas. 
Instead of spending so much, if they had allocated money to each district, which is what Dinkar Dave said, there would have been decentralised water management. Even if you have only two inches of rainfall, there would be no drinking water crisis. We were told about this by a Central water resources secretary. But they didn’t do this, and instead kept promising that water would come from the far away Sardar Sarovar dam, spending thousands of crores, wasting years and decades.
---
*This is the first part of the interview with Medha Patkar. Click here for the second part. Updated on May 12, 2022

Comments

TRENDING

Whither Govt of India strategy to reduce import dependence on crude oil, natural gas?

By NS Venkataraman*  India presently imports around 80% of it’s crude oil requirement and around 50% of its natural gas requirements . As the domestic production of crude oil and natural gas are virtually stagnant and the domestic demand is increasing at around 7% per annum, India’s steadily increasing dependence on import of the vital energy source is a matter of high energy security concern. This is particularly so, since the price of crude oil and natural gas are considerably fluctuating / increasing in the global market due to geo political factors, which are beyond the control of India. India has promised to achieve zero emission by the year 2070, which mean that the level of emission has to start declining at slow and steady rate from now onwards. It is now well recognized that global emission is caused largely due to use of coal as fuel and natural gas as fuel and feedstock. While burning of coal as fuel cause emission of global warming carbon dioxide gas and sulphur

Fascism on prowl? Religious meet 'deeply pained' at silence of Church, bishops, priests

Counterview Desk  The ‘Forum of Religious for Justice and Peace’which held its 17th National Convention at the Montfort Social Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana from 22 to 24 September 2022 on the theme “Deepening our Identity as Religious: Responding to the Signs of the Times”, has expressed concern “at the deteriorating situation of our nation on every front”, especially stating, “Fascism seems to have come to stay” in India. At the same time, the convention, which took place with the participation of 60 persons from 16 states representing 20 religious congregations, in its unanimously-adopted statement added, “We have reached abysmal depths on every parameter: be it social, economic and political”, underlining, “The poor in India become poorer every day; the rich and powerful continue to profiteer at their expense and amass scandalous amounts of wealth.” Text: We, members (63 women and men Religious, from 16 states representing 20 Congregations) of the Forum of Religious for Justice

Muslim intellectuals met Bhagwat, extra-constitutional authority 'like Sanjay Gandhi'

By Shamsul Islam*  In a significant development a delegation of five Muslim intellectuals namely former chief election commissioner SY Quraishi; former senior bureaucrat Najeeb Jung; former AMU vice-chancellor and Lt Gen (retd) Zameer U Shah; politician-cum-journalist Shahid Siddiqui (presently with RLD); and businessman Saeed Shervani [Samajvadi Party] met RSS Supremo Mohan Bhagwat at RSS Delhi headquarters. The meeting was kept secret for reasons known to the participants and was held in August. According to the Muslim intellectuals the meeting held in “a very cordial” atmosphere continued for 75 minutes whereas time allotted was 30 minutes! In a post-meeting justification of the parleys Quraishi stated that their main concern was “the insecurity being increasingly felt by the Muslim community in the wake of recurring incidents of lynching of innocents, calls by Hindutva hotheads for genocide and the marginalisation of the community in almost every sphere”. This delegation consistin

'Massive concern for people': Modi seeking to turn India into global manufacturing hub

By Shankar Sharma*  The news item quoting Narendra Modi at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meet, "Want to turn India into a manufacturing hub: PM Modi at SCO Summit" should be of massive concern to our people. One can only continue to be shocked by such policies, which can be termed as ill-conceived to say the least. Without objectively considering the environmental and social impacts on our communities in the medium to long term, such policies will also result in massive economic impacts because a lack of environmental and social perspective cannot be economically attractive either. In order to become the global manufacturing hub, India will have to meet an enormous demand for energy of various kinds, and in order to meet this much energy demand the economy has to manufacture enormous number of appliances/ gadgets/ machineries (to generate and distribute commercial forms of energy such as coal, nuclear, gas, hydro, and renewable energy (RE) sources such as so

Why Bose's India Gate statue suggests RSS, BJP need violence-loving ‘Hindu’ Netaji

By Prem Singh*  In a TV channel debate, a BJP spokesperson and anchor shared and served a lie that Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose's daughter in her letter to the Prime Minister has alleged that the Congress kept devaluing Netaji to further Gandhi's non-violence; because Netaji had taken the path of liberating the country through violence mode by forming the Azad Hind Fauj (INA). They also praised the Bombay Royal Naval Mutiny of 1946 to confirm that the country got its independence through a violent route. I stated that I have read the letter of Netaji's daughter, and there is no such allegation in it. But a lie told in the intoxication of power is bound to be blatant. Netaji's daughter Anita Bose Pfaff, even in the past, has already requested some earlier prime ministers of the country to bring back the mortal remains of her father from Japan to India. In none of the letters she has spoken about devaluation of her father’s role in the freedom movement on the basis of Gandh

Pesticide companies' lobbying 'seriously impairing' basics of governance, regulation

Dr Narasimha Reddy Donthi*  The Indian agricultural sector is grappling with low incomes, shortage of natural resources, increasing pest incidence and low public investments in research and extension. Pest attacks are increasing. Previously unknown pests are attacking crops. Farmers, indebted as they are due to various market mechanisms, are finding it hard to protect their crop investments. Thus, farmers are pushed into the conundrum of pesticide usage by pesticide markets and companies. Pesticide usage in India is increasingly becoming a regulatory problem. Regulation has not been effective in the face of such challenges. Scientific expertise on pesticides is often subsumed in the policy tradeoffs that, in the ultimate scenario, encourage production and marketing of Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs). Expert Committee reports, which are recommending withdrawal of certain HHPs, are not being acted upon. Lobbying by pesticide companies has seriously impaired the basics of governance an

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

How Gandhian values have become 'casualty' in India under majoritarian BJP rule

By Sandeep Pandey*  A Muslim youth was beaten recently when he tried to witness the famous garba performance during the Hindu religious nine days festival of Navratri in Gujarat. There was a time when Muslims could easily participate in Garbha events in an atmosphere of cordiality. Bilkis Bano was gang raped in 2002 Gujarat communal violence, her 3 years old daughter, the child in womb and a total of 14 family members were killed. 11 accused were awarded life term. However, recently a District level committee has decided to release all the culprits. A ruling Bhartiya Janata Party leader has described some of these criminals as virtuous Brahmins, the highest among the Hindu hierarchical caste system. In a communally polarized Gujarat today most Muslims feel offended by the decision of the government and BJP supporters either justify the release of rapists and murderers or just ignore the ignominious decision. Mahatma Gandhi came from the Guj

Is coal import dependence of more than 50% by 2047 of any relevance to India?

By Shankar Sharma*  I have read the article " Building Resilience in India’s Power Sector " by N Vedachalam, released by the Observer Research Foundation, with a lot of interest. I expected it to provide few useful recommendations to our authorities in charting out a sustainable pathway to green energy transition much before the climate catastrophe push our communities to the precipice. But I am sorry to say that the overall discussions or the message implied in the article disappointed me. I was expecting the article, coming from an engineer with past experience in the power sector, to discuss the much needed recommendations to put the power sector on a sustainable developmental pathway. But I could notice mostly technical jargon and a lot of statistical information, which may already be available in the public domain.   The article also seems to have simply accepted what some of the official agencies seem to have indicated as inevitable for the power sector in our country;

'True decolonisation move': Demand to name new Parliament building after Ambedkar

By Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd*  In recent weeks, there has been a demand for the new Parliament building being constructed on the revamped Central Vista in New Delhi to be named after the architect of the Constitution and anti-caste leader BR Ambedkar. On September 14, the Telangana Assembly passed a resolution urging the Centre to name the new Parliament building after Ambedkar. The Bharatiya Janata Party was absent during the debate about the resolution. The next day, the Telangana Rashtra Samithi-led government declared that the new secretariat in the centre of Hyderabad would be named after Ambedkar. Chief Minister K Chandrasekhar Rao added that he would write to Prime Minister Narendra Modi requesting him to name the new Parliament building in Delhi “Ambedkar Parliament”. The demand is finding resonance among civil society groups too and has led to social media discussions as well as public mobilisation.  But two questions arise: Should a Parliament that makes laws for a nation over a