Skip to main content

Govt of India 'ignores' GMO regulation, 'overlooks' Constitutional process

Counterview Desk

Dr Narasimha Reddy Donthi, independent public policy expert, in a letter to Nareshpal Gangwar, additional secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), New Delhi, has expressed “seriously concern” that a recent office memorandum (OM) has sought to exempt certain types of gene-edited plants from the country's genetically modified organism  (GMO) regulations, without any reason or basis or representation.
Dr Reddy regretted, “Such a serious decision, with an impact scale of unimaginable proportions, in terms of time and ecology, is being pushed through an ordinary office memorandum”, insisting, “This is circumvention of the processes enshrined in Indian Constitution, which has defined democratic participation in matters of critical importance.”
Stating that the exemption from regulation is a policy decision and has legal implications, he demanded immediate withdrawal the OM, insisting, the government should take a "strong stand against any attempts to exclude new GMOs from the existing regulation.”


Ref: Office Memorandum, dated 30th March, 2022, F. No. C-12013/3/2020-CS-III, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change
Sub: Exemption of the Genome Edited plants falling under the categories of SDN1 and SDN2 under the provisions of the Rules, 1989
Dear Sri Nareshpal Gangwar ji,
With reference to the above notification, we are seriously concerned about the future of regulation of gene-edited plants in India. This office memorandum has exempted certain types of gene-edited plants from the country's GMO regulations, without any reason or basis or representation. Such a serious decision, with an impact scale of unimaginable proportions, in terms of times and ecology, is being pushed through an ordinary office memorandum. This is circumvention of the processes enshrined in Indian Constitution, which has defined democratic participation in matters of critical importance. Exemption from regulation is a policy decision and has legal implications. Regulation and regulatory processes are bound by law. Exemption from law also has equal importance, if not more.
Through a mere Office Memorandum, government has initiated a major shift in regulatory action. This is in fact a shift in policy. Policy change cannot be brought in through a OM. This OM does not even explain properly and appropriately how this separate 'regulation' will be effective. It is a sinister attempt to dilute GM regulation, no doubt.
Biosafety implications are valid or same for SDN1, SDN2 and SDN3. This OM is attempting to grade biosafety. When gene-editing is a scientist-led process, dependent regulators cannot differentiate, unless we have transparency and independent verification mechanisms.
Importantly, this change in rules will go beyond allowing gene-edited plants without any “foreign” genes to be subjected to a weaker regulatory process or no regulation. The OM referred does not explain further, apart from unhooking these two categories. If we understand correctly, with this OM, two categories of gene-edited products -- in which genes are either disrupted to make them non-functional or altered to change the function of their protein product but not where a gene from another organism has been deliberately inserted -- will escape being regulated as GMOs. Categorisation of gene-editing plants into these three categories is not supported by science. This is unscientific, irresponsible, and based on assumptions that could turn out to be false, because a) gene editing doesn’t have to involve foreign genes to be risky and b) the types of gene-editing that will escape regulation can in fact introduce foreign genetic material.
SDN1 (as defined) results in normal nucleotide gene sequence disruption eventually resulting in partial or entire gene disruption. The omnigenic model of genes which is now starting to be understood for plants and humans that genes operate in networks not through isolation. That is edits in even a single gene can alter core biochemical pathways in the plant in unpredictable ways. Not only that, tissue culture which is used in genome editing as well, have also been found to cause mutations too. The Agrobacterium infection at times used for SDN-1 has been seen to increase mutations in genome editing as well.
The text in Draft Document on “Genome Edited Organisms: Regulatory Framework and Guidelines For Risk Assessment” stating ‘In rare cases, single base pair mutation(s) might result in the introduction of novel trait (e.g., Herbicide tolerance) which might pose additional biosafety concerns’ itself admitted the issue with leaving SDN-1 as unregulated. The statement in the draft document admitting that ‘currently available nucleases used for genome editing experiments are not completely error-free and therefore exhibit some offtarget effect(s) /un-intentional genetic changes at other than the target location during the genome editing process’ states the same. There is indeed an increasing body of scientific research showing how genome editing results in lot of unintended on-target/near-target/off-target effects as well in animals, humans and plants. This includes unintended insertions/deletions/mutations/DNA rearrangements as well.
Without the necessary regulatory checks, the regulators and the public won’t even know of such changes. It is for this reason that countries like New Zealand and the EU countries -- known to have stronger biosafety regulations -- have not left SDN-1 from genetic modification regulations.
This OM also opens up possibility of exemption of gene-edited plants under false pretences. GMOs claimed to contain no foreign DNA may get exempted from GMO regulatory processes under false pretences. According to a correspondence article by South Korean scientists published in Nature Biotechnology, in 2016, this has happened. In the article, the authors cite the case of the gene-edited non-browning mushroom. Earlier in the same year, the USDA exempted the mushroom from regulatory oversight on the basis of claims by the developer that it was "transgene-free" and had "no foreign DNA" integrated into its genome. But the authors point out that the approved mushroom "may still contain tiny fragments of foreign DNA in its genome". Deregulation of certain classes of gene-edited GMOs is based on the hypothetical – and, it now appears, mostly false – assumption that they do not contain any foreign DNA.
Rather than short-read sequencing (as is generally done by developers), whole genome longread DNA sequencing must be done to ensure all unintended changes are spotted. In addition, transcriptomics, metabolomics and proteomics analyses must be done to detect any unintended functional and compositional changes too.
Through this letter, we demand that
  • Government of India and GEAC to withdraw this OM of exemption, immediately.
  • Government should take a strong stand against any attempts to exclude new GMOs from the existing regulation.
  • Government and decision-makers should ensure mandatory safety checks, regulatory transparency and exclude GMOs in food.
It is important that regulators guarantee the safety of our food, as well as protect nature, the environment and our freedom of choice. Indian Constitution puts such an onus on the regulators under law.
We look forward to your response immediately.
Click here for references



North Gujarat gram panchayat bars villagers from dealing with Muslim hawkers, traders

By Our Representative  A gram panchayat in North Gujarat has barred its residents not to buy anything from Muslim traders and hawkers. An order of the Waghasan group gram panchayat of Tharad taluka of Banaskantha district dated June 30 states that the decision has been taken in the wake of beheading of a Hindu tailor after he posted a derogatory writeup on Prophet Mohammad in Udaipur. The gram panchayat resolution says, anyone seen buying or selling any commodity from a Muslim hawker or trader would be fined Rs 5,100. Bringing this to light, Mujahid Nafees, convener, Minority Coordination Committee, in a letter to Gujarat chief minister Bhupendra Patel, says, the state government should take legal action against the panchayat chief who has signed the “unjust” order. The letter says, the act of the sarpanch and other signatories is a violation of rule of law of the state and threat to peace, pointing out, the move is in violation of Article 15 of the Constitution, which says that none

Unlike Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India: Ukrainian scholar tells 'Indian friends'

Counterview Desk In an open letter to "dear Indian friends", Anastasia Piliavsky, born in Odessa, Ukraine, studied at Boston and Oxford Universities (on a Rhodes Scholarship), and now teaches at King’s College, London, has said that she faces "deep moral dilemma", personally and professionally, over the "astonishingly unified Indian response to the war in Ukraine." Based on her interaction with a "number of thoughtful and caring Indian friends", in this letter, she says, she is "reeling at the ubiquitous silence at, justifications of or outright support for Putin’s terror, which now prevails in India, at the ubiquitous #IStandWithPutin and #istandwithrussia hashtags." She insists, India must understand, "Unlike the Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India. Soviet leaders, beginning with (the Ukrainian) Nikita Khrushchev – who declared hindi rusi bhai bhai – built up deep political and cultural exchange with India." Text : I

Technocratic globalism, tyranny? Health Ministry warned: bill to 'enslave' Indians

Sandeep Pandey, Tushar Gandhi By Rosamma Thomas*  Union of Concerned Citizens, a group comprising Magsaysay Award winner Prof Sandeep Pandey, human rights activist Tushar Gandhi, former judge of the Bombay High Court BG Kolse Patil, pediatrician Dr Jacob Puliyel and several renowned Indian citizens have written to the Union Health Minister cautioning him against tabling the draft Public Health Bill in the Monsoon Session of Parliament. “The Public Health (Prevention, Control And Management Of Epidemics, Bio-Terrorism And Disasters) Bill, 2017 and a Prospective Bill of 2022 as discussed in news articles, is straightforwardly violative of Fundamental Rights of the citizens of India and therefore, Ultra Vires of the Indian Constitution. It contravenes several International Treaties and Conventions including the Nuremberg Treaty of 1947 which was enacted to ensure that no country would repeat such inhuman medical atrocities on fellow human beings”, the 12-page letter reads. “Strangely, t

Protesters demand release of Teesta Setalvad, Sreekumar, seek review of SC order

By Our Representative  Protests broke out across India on June 27 following Teesta Setalvad’s arrest demanding her immediate release. Sabrang India , a site run by Setalvad, claimed she was “arrested on trumped-up charges after the Supreme Court dismissed the petition moved by Zakia Jafri demanding an investigation into the larger conspiracy behind the 2002 Gujarat violence.” The protesters also demanded release of former DGP Gujarat police RB Sreekumar, also arrested simultaneously. The protests were preceded by over 2,200 people from across the globe signing a statement demanding their immediate release. Leading signatories such as People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) general secretary V Suresh, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) convenor Medha Patkar, former Naval chief Admiral Ramdas. “The state has used the observations made in the judgment to falsely and vindictively prosecute those who had struggled for justice even in the face of state callousness and complicit

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Electoral bonds scheme 'compromises' voluntary nature PM relief fund donations

By Rosamma Thomas*  The Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund (PMNRF) is meant to collect voluntary donations from the general public, either individuals or organizations, to enable assistance to people in times of natural disaster, or for expensive medical treatment. That fundamental voluntary character of the fund, however, has changed in recent years.  The gazette notification of January 2018 announcing the Electoral Bond scheme states, in Clause 12 (2): “The amount of bonds not encashed within the validity period of fifteen days shall be deposited by the authorized bank to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund”. The Union government has, thus, through notification, directed funds to be deposited into what was meant to be purely voluntary. Commodore Lokesh Batra, who has been campaigning for transparency in government functioning, holds that once a gazette notification has been issued directing that funds be deposited into the PMNRF, the character of the whole fund has changed,

'Highly abnormal': AltNews journo's arrest suggests 'deterioration in media freedom'

By Bharat Dogra*  Leading media organizations have come out in strong support of recently arrested journalist Mohammed Zubair. These organizations include, among others, the Editors Guild of India, the Press Club of India, the Delhi Union of Journalists and DIGIPUB, a platform for several important digital media organizations. All these organizations have condemned the recent arrest of the noted journalist and demanded his immediate release. While leading human rights organizations and political parties have also made somewhat similar statements, the strong support of media organizations is particularly important as the effort of the authorities has been to try to present the arrested journalist as someone who has been indulging in irresponsible journalism.  In such a situation the support of those media organizations who are familiar with his work and who are most capable of judging the quality of his work is very important. In this context it is important that some media organization

Majoritarian silence helping Hindutva forces 'handover' national resources to corporates

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  The majority of Indian citizens are witnessing the persecution and everyday violence against their fellow citizens who are Muslims and religious minorities. The growing assaults on reason, science, secularism, Indian democracy and constitution are going to be landmarks in Indian history of diminishing democracy and citizenship rights. It is clear that Hindutva ideology is directly promoting sectarian politics of hate which is dangerous for the unity and integrity of India, peace and prosperity of Indians. The majoritarian silence helps in empowering Hindutva and their electoral dividends. From witnessing the persecution in the sidelines to the active participation and cheering loud or silence accelerates violence against our neighbours and our fellow citizens. How and why do majority of Indians stay silent and contribute to the persecution of their fellow citizens who are Muslims and religious minorities? The question baffles me as an Indian because I have gr

Electricity Bill: Centre's reform measures contain 'carrot and stick package' for states

Counterview Desk  The Peoples’ Commission on Public Sector and Public Services (PCPSPS), claiming to be a network of eminent academics, jurists, erstwhile administrators, trade unionists and social activists, seeking consultations with stakeholders with those who are against the government’s decision to monetise, disinvest and privatise public assets/enterprises, has said that the proposed Electricity (Amendment) Bill-2022 will have far-reaching impacts on the finances of states. Insisting that the proposed Bill would lead to “assault on India’s federal structure”, in a statement, it says, it would weaken the finances of states’ power distribution companies, have adverse impact on utility employees, cripple the states' finances, impose a heavy cost burden on the smaller subsidized consumers (especially farmers), and benefit only corporate business houses. “States cannot afford to ignore the far-reaching implications of the Bill on their economy, finances, agricultural and industria

Cops 'refuse to register' complaint after BSF shot landless worker off Bangla border

By Our Representative  Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), and national convener, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), in a complaint to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), referring to the incident of “firing and execution” of a poor Muslim youth, has alleged that the 26 year old was was shot at “without giving any warning” one and half kilometers inside the Indian territory from Bangladesh border by an on- duty Border Security Force (BSF) personnel. Stating that the person, Ruhul Mondal, belonged to an Other Backward Class (OBC), and hailed from Ramnarayan Para village under Sagarpara police station in Murshidabad district, West Bengal, Roy in his representation said, the BSF person who shot at him is “attached with Singpara Border Outpost, 141 Battalion”, underlining, the BSF has now floated “self defense theory” to cover up its operation. According to the BSF officials, the incident took place in the jute fields in