Skip to main content

'BJP-inspired' bulldozer demolitions planned in more Delhi Muslim majority areas

Counterview Desk 

Over 30 women’s and other organizations and several concerned citizens in a “Letter of Deep Distress and Concern” regarding what they call “the ongoing unlawful demolition drives in Delhi”, have expressed dismay at the way in which bulldozers hired by civic authorities are targeting temporary structures essential for the livelihood of the poorest communities of Delhi.
Stating that these communities “have already suffered sudden and severe destruction of their livelihoods during the last two years of the coronavirus pandemic and lockdown”, the letter, addressed to the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, the Delhi Chief Minister, and Mayors of all the five Municipal Corporations of Delhi, says, in the case of Jahangirpuri, “it is not an illegal or unauthorised colony as has been reported in sections of the press”.
It insists, “It is an official resettlement colony established by the government itself, and its residents have fulfilled the due process required by the process of resettlement which includes possessing all the paperwork for their residences and moveable and immoveable property.”
The letter believes, “There is obviously a communal purpose to these demolitions, as blatantly communal sentiments have been expressed on the matter by political actors and echoed in media quarters”, pointing out, “More such demolitions have been planned primarily in Muslim majority areas of Delhi – these include Shaheen Bagh, Okhla, Jasola and Madanpur Khadar”
According to the letter, “In Jahangirpuri, long-time residents have been painted in this poisonous communal atmosphere as illegal immigrants, ‘Rohingyas’, ‘Bangladeshis’ and ‘rioters’ without a shred of evidence.”
The signatories, led by Annie Raja of the National Federation of Indian Women Maimoona Mollah of the All-India Democratic Women’s Association, Kavita Krishnan of the All-India Progressive Women’s Association, Poonam Kaushik of the Pragatisheel Mahila Sangathan, and Vani of Saheli, say, the demolitions are part of “countrywide actions by the BJP attacking Muslim lives, practices and livelihoods.”
The letter wants to immediately put an end to demolitions of any sort; reassure the Muslim residents of Delhi that they will be offered the full protection of the law and the Constitution; and offer just compensation, rehabilitation and restoration of lost livelihoods to residents whose property has been illegally destroyed by the state, subjecting them to loss of livelihood and personal trauma.

Text:

We, the undersigned, wish to express our deep concern at the bulldozer-led demolitions carried out by various municipal corporations in Delhi. As is well known, the first round of demolitions was carried out by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation in Jahangirpuri resettlement colony on April 20, 2022, soon after the communal violence in the area just four days prior to that.
The recent visits to and subsequent statement by the SDMC Mayor regarding areas earmarked for future demolition points to the real and present danger that the actions in Jahangirpuri and Kalyanpuri over the past week will be repeated in these areas that have already been named – Shaheen Bagh, Jasola, Sarita Vihar, Jaitpur and Madanpur Khadar.
It is deeply disturbing that demolitions in these areas have been put on hold only because the Delhi Police publicly asked for ten days’ notice in order to cooperate with the order. Massive presence of paramilitary forces in some of these areas as well as frequent processions of slogan shouting crowds led by BJP leaders are contributing to an overall climate of intimidation and terror.
It is appalling that the bulldozers hired by civic authorities are targeting temporary structures essential for livelihood such as handcarts and cycle carts, fruit stalls, gumtis, and wooden ‘shop’ tables. These structures are used all over the country by some of the poorest communities in the city – rickshaw pullers, fruit vendors, women running marginal and subsistence businesses, ragpickers, garbage sorters, vendors and hawkers.
The brutality of the action to destroy the precious belongings of some of the poorest residents of the city is unprecedented in the history of Delhi. The affected are overwhelmingly unprotected informal economy workers who have already suffered sudden and severe destruction of their livelihoods during last two years of the coronavirus pandemic and lockdown.
Jahangirpuri is not an illegal or unauthorised colony as has been reported in sections of the press. It is an official resettlement colony established by the government itself, and its residents have fulfilled the due process required by the process of resettlement which includes possessing all the paperwork for their residences and moveable and immoveable property.
Are Jahangirpuri residents not subject to the same laws as all other colonies and residents of Delhi-NCT? Why are they now being targeted to the exclusion of thousands if not lakhs of such structures around the city and the country? The use of bulldozers point to discriminatory and arbitrary use of power by the MCD authority, the legality of which is under question.
Delhi’s development in the past century has always included a large number of ‘illegal’, ‘unauthorised’, and ‘regularised’ colonies, in both working class and affluent areas of the city. Far from curtailing this kind of development, the MCD Act of 1957, the DDA Act of 1957, and multiple Supreme Court judgments have put in place protective legislation for residents of the city who contribute to its impressive GDP and growth rates.
The National Capital Territory of Delhi (Recognition of Property Rights of Residents of Unauthorised Colonies) Act, 2019, assured the residents of unauthorised colonies “their rights of ownership, transfer or mortgage.”
In Sudama Singh vs Government of Delhi (2010), the 2015 Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy and a 2019 SC judgment, the law unambiguously held that demolitions without adequate procedure and due cause resulted in “a grave violation of the rights of life and liberty” of the residents. In the 2019 case, the Supreme Court in fact directed the Railways to compensate the residents of Shakur Basti for “the unilateral action of forced eviction.”
The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 in Delhi, requires civic authorities to survey street vendors and provide them with licenses and allot sites.
Legally, therefore, demolitions may be considered a last resort and can only be carried out after undertaking a proper survey, giving notice to the residents or vendors, allowing them time to respond and strictly following due process. Since these steps have not been undertaken in Delhi, how can the MCD claim to know that the street carts, stalls, etc targeted for demolishing in Delhi are “unauthorised”?
Jahangirpuri is not an illegal or unauthorised colony as has been reported. It is a resettlement colony established by government
The demolitions are therefore a clearly arbitrary use of power by the MCD authority, the legality of which is under question as they target the rights to life and livelihood that has been upheld on countless occasions by the courts and the law of this land.
Further, the use of bulldozers for these demolitions appears to be a willful act of collective punishment to a vulnerable population. In fact, it is obvious that these demolitions are politically motivated. They were carried out by state authorities on the basis of communal sentiments expressed by several political actors and echoed in various media quarters.
Evictions of street vendors have taken place since November 2021 in Connaught Place, Sarojini Nagar and Chandni Chowk. While these too were carried out with violence and destroyed hundreds of livelihoods, at these sites, unlike at Jahangirpuri, bulldozers were not used to destroy push carts and takhts.
Now it has come to our notice that more such demolitions have been planned only in Muslim majority areas of Delhi – these include Shaheen Bagh, Okhla, Jasola and Madanpur Khadar. In Jahangirpuri, we have seen how long-time residents have been painted in this poisonous communal atmosphere as illegal immigrants, “Rohingyas”, “Bangladeshis” and “rioters” without a shred of evidence.
Further, an ill-informed, unsustainable and poisonous link has been implied between communal violence and the residents of these colonies. This narrative has been used to justify these unprecedented recent demolitions, presented in the national consciousness as a ‘punishment’, which is the exact word used by the BJP state chief Adesh Gupta who, according to news reports, pressured the MCD to carry out the demolition and continue it even up to an hour after the Supreme Court’s status quo order.
The terrifying bulldozers have destroyed precious basic infrastructure related to small businesses and taken away the livelihood of the most marginalised residents of our society.
The critical question is: what is the urgency to evict poor street vendors, whether Hindu or Muslim or of any community, when they are suffering record unemployment and price rise and economic devastation after two years of the pandemic and lockdown?
This is certainly not how a caring state responds to its citizens in distress. The demolitions must be acknowledged as communally and politically motivated, and are a part of countrywide actions by the BJP attacking Muslim lives, practices and livelihoods.
We call upon all the authorities
  • To take serious note of this unfolding injustice by concerned authorities, and immediately put an end to demolitions of any sort. Stop attacking the source of livelihood and homes of the poor residents immediately.
  • To reassure the Muslim residents of Delhi that they belong as much as any other community does, to the city, and will be offered the full protection of the law and the Constitution.
  • To offer just compensation, rehabilitation and restoration of lost livelihoods to residents whose property has been illegally destroyed by the state, subjecting them to loss of livelihood and personal trauma.
We also call upon all democratic forces in Delhi to raise their voices against this injustice and to stand with our fellow citizens against such threats to their lives and livelihoods.
---
Click here for the list of signatories

Comments

TRENDING

'Enough evidence' in Indian tradition to support legal basis for same-sex marriage

By Iyce Malhotra, Joseph Mathai, Sandeep Chachra*  The ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court on same-sex marriage provides space for much-needed conversations on issues that have hitherto remained “invisible” or engaged with patriarchal locker room humour. We must recognize that people with diverse sexualities and complex gender identities have faced discrimination, stigma and decades of oppression. Their issues have mainly remained buried in dominant social discourse, and many view them with deep insecurities.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Victim of communal violence, Christians in Manipur want Church leadership to speak up

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  The first eleven days of May 2023 have, in many ways, been a defining period of Indian history! Plenty has happened in a rapid-fire stream of events. Ironically, each one of them are indicators of how crimes and the criminalisation of society has become the ‘new norm’; these include, the May Day rallies with a focus on the four labour codes which are patently against the rights of workers; the U S Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) released its Annual Report on 1 May stating that conditions for religious freedom in India “continued to worsen in 2022”; the continued protest by the Indian women wrestlers at Jantar Mantar for the expulsion of the chief of the Indian Wrestlers Federation on very serious allegations; the Elections in Karnataka on 10 May (with communalism and corruption as the mainstay); the release of the fake, derogative and insensitive film ‘The Kerala Story’; the release of World Free Press Index on 3 May which places India

Delhi HC rules in favour of retired Air Force officer 'overcharged' for Covid treatment

By Rosamma Thomas*  In a decision of May 22, 2023, the Delhi High Court ruled in favour of petitioner Group Captain Suresh Khanna who was under treatment at CK Birla Hospital, Gurugram, between April 28 and May 5, 2021, for a period of eight days, for Covid-19 pneumonia. The petitioner had to pay Rs 3,55,286 as treatment costs, but the Ex-Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (ECHS) only reimbursed him for Rs 1,83,748, on the basis of government-approved rates. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Unlike other revolutionaries, Hindutva icon wrote 5 mercy petitions to British masters

By Shamsul Islam*  The Hindutva icon VD Savarkar of the RSS-BJP rulers of India submitted not one, two,or three but five mercy petitions to the British masters! Savarkarites argue: “There are no evidences to prove that Savarkar collaborated with the British for his release from jail. In fact, his appeal for release was a ruse. He was well aware of the political developments outside and wanted to be part of it. So he kept requesting for his release. But the British authorities did not trust him a bit” (YD Phadke, ‘A complex Hero’, "The Indian Expres"s, August 31, 2004)

India joining US sponsored trade pillar to hurt Indian farmers, 'promote' GM seeds, food

Counterview Desk  As many as 32 civil society organisations (CSOs), in a letter to Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal on the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) and India joining the trade pillar, have said that its provisions will allow the US to ensure a more favourable regulatory regime “for enhancing its exports of genetically modified (GM) seeds and GM food”, underlining, it will “significantly hurt the livelihoods of Indian farmers.”

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam* In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

Undermining law, breastfeeding? Businesses 'using' celebrities to promote baby food

By Rajiv Shah  A report prepared by the top child welfare NGO, Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India (BPNI), has identified as many as 15 offenders allegedly violating the Indian baby food law, the Infant Milk Substitutes Feeding Bottles, and Infant Foods (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Act 1992, and Amendment Act 2003 (IMS Act), stating, compliance with the law “seems to be dwindling by the day.”