Skip to main content

Top cops, politicians, celebrities accountable for 'applauding' Telangana fake encounter

Counterview Desk 

In a statement, activists from the Telangana Women and Transgender Organizations Joint Action Committee (WT-JAC), commenting on the Supreme Court-appointed Commission Report in the ‘Disha Encounter’ Case, in which four young people were killed on December 6, 2019 in Telangana, have insisted that FIR be registered against all the policemen “specifically named and indicted by the Commission and they be arrested.”
Signed by petitioners before the Apex Court K Sajaya, V Sandhya, M Vimala and Meera Sanghamitra, the statement, even as welcoming the Commission’s Report for “upholding ‘rule of law’ and recommending criminal action against 10 policemen guilty of murder of four persons, including 3 minor boys”, says, “We remind the senior police officers, political leaders and celebrities who applauded this fake encounter, that as social activists, we will hold them responsible and accountable to secure our right to justice, while challenging unconstitutional methods of ‘seeking justice’.”

Text:

The Justice VS Sirpurkar Commission of Inquiry on the ‘encounter’ killings of four young people (who were accused of rape and murder of a young doctor) on 6th Dec, 2019 in Hyderabad has submitted its report to the Supreme Court. Referring back the matter to the Telangana High Court, the Apex Court directed on 20th May that copies of the Report be made available to the parties, which includes the undersigned, members of WT-JAC Telangana.
After meticulously studying thousands of pages of documentary, forensic evidence and cross-examining nearly 140 individuals, the Commission recommended that all the ten police personnel who were involved in the killing of the four young men must face trial for murder “under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC, 201 r/w 302 IPC and 34 IPC”. The Commission concluded that the four youth were deliberately fired upon by the police with an intent to cause their death and with the knowledge that the firing would result in their death. It also held that the accused did not snatch any weapons from the police party and hence the claim of firing in 'self-defence’ is false.
The Commission unambiguously states, “Each one of them were responsible for the safe keeping of the four deceased suspects. If either by acts or omissions they failed to fulfil their responsibility, then their common intention to cause the deaths of the deceased suspects is established. Their conduct subsequent to the deaths of the deceased suspects in falsifying the record would indicate that not only did they act in furtherance of common intention to give false information in order to screen the offenders but also that, they all acted with the common intention to cause the deaths of the four deceased suspects.”
It may be recalled that the Cyberabad police picked up the four suspects (Mohd. Arif, Chintakunta Chennakesavulu, Jollu Shiva and Jollu Naveen) from their homes in the middle of the night, a day after the 25-year-old veterinarian, Disha’s charred remains were found under a bridge at Chatanpally on the outskirts of Hyderabad on 28th Nov, 2019. In the wee hours of 6th Dec, 2019, the four young persons were killed in an alleged ‘encounter’ by the police.
The same evening, 15 women’s rights and civil rights activists of Telangana including the undersigned approached the High Court via a letter which was converted into WP(PIL) No.173 of 2019. The activists prayed for preservation of the dead bodies, independent autopsy, compliance of SC’s guidelines in PUCL vs Union of India, court-monitored probe and prosecution of the guilty officers for murder. The High Court immediately responded and directed that the bodies be preserved and subsequently passed Orders for implementation of PUCL guidelines.
Even as the Telangana High Court was seized of the matter, a Writ Petition was moved before the Supreme Court seeking inquiry into the said ‘encounter’. On 12th December 2019, the Apex Court constituted the 3-member Commission of Inquiry, headed by Justice VS Sirpurkar, with Justice Rekha Baldota (former Mumbai HC judge) and Dr. D.R. Karthikeyan (former CBI Director) as the other members. As the Order of the Apex Court was silent about the dead bodies of the four young men and collection of evidence, four of the undersigned activists including K Sajaya, V Sandhya, M Vimala and Meera Sanghamitra moved WP (Crl) 364/2019 before the Apex Court seeking directions for collection, preservation, and safe custody of evidence. The Supreme Court directed these four applicants to approach the High Court. Subsequently, K Sajaya moved an application before the Telangana High Court seeking directions on preservation and collection of evidence. The Telangana High court passed detailed Orders in respect of a second autopsy, seizure and preservation of evidence.
The Commission began its hearings on 21st August 2021 in the premises of the High Court of Telangana. Since the pandemic was still raging, the Commission resorted to a hybrid form of proceedings which combined physical and virtual hearings. On behalf of the undersigned, K Sajaya filed an affidavit, deposed before the Commission on 13-09-2021 and made detailed written submissions to the Commission. From August to November 2021, the proceedings of the Commission were regularly reported in the English and Telugu media. Advocates Vrinda Grover, Vasudha Nagaraj and Soutik Banerjee, spearheaded the legal case and represented the activists before the Supreme Court, Telangana High Court and the Commission of Inquiry.
The Commission’s report which runs into 387 pages exposes a series of violations of procedures of arrest, remand, investigation, the worst of them being the wilful side-lining of the fact that three of the suspects were minors as per their school records. Senior officials of the police department who were heading operations during this incident, and the SIT officials who conducted an “inquiry” that merely tried to go along with the narrative put out by the police department, have not been specifically recommended for any punitive action by the Commission, but the evidence is compiled in detail.
At a time when state authorities are increasingly resorting to extra-judicial methods, the Commission’s observations that “Just as Mob Lynching is unacceptable, so is any idea of instant justice. At any point of time Rule of Law must prevail. Punishment for crime has to be only by the procedure established by law", assumes great significance. While we appreciate the arduous task undertaken by the Commission and welcome the Report, we feel it falls short of naming and recommending similar action against the senior-most police officials in-charge of the investigation, encounter and cover-up of evidence.
In the light of the Commission’s findings, pending further action by the High Court of Telangana to whom the Supreme Court has referred the issue:
  1. We demand that an FIR be registered immediately against all the policemen specifically named and indicted by the Commission and they be arrested.
  2. We urge the Hon’ble High Court to take steps for prosecution of the ten policemen on fast-track to fix accountability of all police personnel, including ascribe command responsibility of senior most officers, for the loss of life and restore public confidence in the rule of law.
  3. We call for speedy investigation into the brutal murder of Disha, which got invisibilised because of the killings of the four suspects.
  4. We demand that the families of all the four persons killed be provided exemplary compensation by the State, as well as Govt employment to one person in each family.
  5. We demand that the state government take all necessary measures to safeguard rights of women through due process of law. We strongly condemn that in the name of ‘ensuring safety and freedom for women’, the police and state are creating lawlessness and circumventing the rule of law, by resorting to extra-judicial killings of accused, which can never bring justice to the wronged women / survivors of violence and their families.
We remind the senior police officers, political leaders and celebrities who applauded this fake encounter, that as social activists, we will hold them responsible and accountable to secure our right to justice, while challenging unconstitutional methods of ‘seeking justice’.

Comments

TRENDING

Unlike Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India: Ukrainian scholar tells 'Indian friends'

Counterview Desk In an open letter to "dear Indian friends", Anastasia Piliavsky, born in Odessa, Ukraine, studied at Boston and Oxford Universities (on a Rhodes Scholarship), and now teaches at King’s College, London, has said that she faces "deep moral dilemma", personally and professionally, over the "astonishingly unified Indian response to the war in Ukraine." Based on her interaction with a "number of thoughtful and caring Indian friends", in this letter, she says, she is "reeling at the ubiquitous silence at, justifications of or outright support for Putin’s terror, which now prevails in India, at the ubiquitous #IStandWithPutin and #istandwithrussia hashtags." She insists, India must understand, "Unlike the Soviet Union, Russia is no friend to India. Soviet leaders, beginning with (the Ukrainian) Nikita Khrushchev – who declared hindi rusi bhai bhai – built up deep political and cultural exchange with India." Text : I

Teesta treaty? Modi sends ball to Mamata's court amidst Hasina's mango diplomacy

By Samina Akhter*  Most Bangladeshi and India media reports say that the West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has received 600 kg of mangoes from Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina as part of her "mango-hilsa diplomacy." Hasina also delivered mangoes to President Ram Nath Kovind and Prime Minister Narendra Modi this month, according to the Bangladesh Deputy High Commission in India. In all, 1,200 kg of Amrapali mangoes were delivered to the residences of the President and the Prime Minister of India. According to a Bangladesh's deputy high commission official in Kolkata, a few more chief ministers in the eastern region will likely receive similar gifts. Last year, not only President Kovind and Prime Minister Modi, but also the chief ministers of West Bengal, Tripura, and Assam also received mangoes from Prime Minister Hasina. Hasina delivered mangoes from Rajshahi, including kinds like Golapkhas and Amrapali, as it is the peak season for the delectable fruit in

Technocratic globalism, tyranny? Health Ministry warned: bill to 'enslave' Indians

Sandeep Pandey, Tushar Gandhi By Rosamma Thomas*  Union of Concerned Citizens, a group comprising Magsaysay Award winner Prof Sandeep Pandey, human rights activist Tushar Gandhi, former judge of the Bombay High Court BG Kolse Patil, pediatrician Dr Jacob Puliyel and several renowned Indian citizens have written to the Union Health Minister cautioning him against tabling the draft Public Health Bill in the Monsoon Session of Parliament. “The Public Health (Prevention, Control And Management Of Epidemics, Bio-Terrorism And Disasters) Bill, 2017 and a Prospective Bill of 2022 as discussed in news articles, is straightforwardly violative of Fundamental Rights of the citizens of India and therefore, Ultra Vires of the Indian Constitution. It contravenes several International Treaties and Conventions including the Nuremberg Treaty of 1947 which was enacted to ensure that no country would repeat such inhuman medical atrocities on fellow human beings”, the 12-page letter reads. “Strangely, t

Cops 'refuse to register' complaint after BSF shot landless worker off Bangla border

By Our Representative  Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), and national convener, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), in a complaint to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), referring to the incident of “firing and execution” of a poor Muslim youth, has alleged that the 26 year old was was shot at “without giving any warning” one and half kilometers inside the Indian territory from Bangladesh border by an on- duty Border Security Force (BSF) personnel. Stating that the person, Ruhul Mondal, belonged to an Other Backward Class (OBC), and hailed from Ramnarayan Para village under Sagarpara police station in Murshidabad district, West Bengal, Roy in his representation said, the BSF person who shot at him is “attached with Singpara Border Outpost, 141 Battalion”, underlining, the BSF has now floated “self defense theory” to cover up its operation. According to the BSF officials, the incident took place in the jute fields in

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Protesters demand release of Teesta Setalvad, Sreekumar, seek review of SC order

By Our Representative  Protests broke out across India on June 27 following Teesta Setalvad’s arrest demanding her immediate release. Sabrang India , a site run by Setalvad, claimed she was “arrested on trumped-up charges after the Supreme Court dismissed the petition moved by Zakia Jafri demanding an investigation into the larger conspiracy behind the 2002 Gujarat violence.” The protesters also demanded release of former DGP Gujarat police RB Sreekumar, also arrested simultaneously. The protests were preceded by over 2,200 people from across the globe signing a statement demanding their immediate release. Leading signatories such as People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) general secretary V Suresh, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) convenor Medha Patkar, former Naval chief Admiral Ramdas. “The state has used the observations made in the judgment to falsely and vindictively prosecute those who had struggled for justice even in the face of state callousness and complicit

Electoral bonds scheme 'compromises' voluntary nature PM relief fund donations

By Rosamma Thomas*  The Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund (PMNRF) is meant to collect voluntary donations from the general public, either individuals or organizations, to enable assistance to people in times of natural disaster, or for expensive medical treatment. That fundamental voluntary character of the fund, however, has changed in recent years.  The gazette notification of January 2018 announcing the Electoral Bond scheme states, in Clause 12 (2): “The amount of bonds not encashed within the validity period of fifteen days shall be deposited by the authorized bank to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund”. The Union government has, thus, through notification, directed funds to be deposited into what was meant to be purely voluntary. Commodore Lokesh Batra, who has been campaigning for transparency in government functioning, holds that once a gazette notification has been issued directing that funds be deposited into the PMNRF, the character of the whole fund has changed,

Bulldozing houses in UP: India isn't Israel, Muslims living here 'aren't Palestinians'

By Naveen Tewari, Sandeep Pandey*  A recent full front page of the advertisement by a Bhartiya Janata Party government declares, 'House is not just a word. It is a place where power to dream comes and aspirations are fulfilled. Home is much about dignity and security than it is about shelter.' It further goes on to quote Narendra Modi, 'It is my dream that every Indian has a pucca house by 2022.' The occasion was dedication of houses built by a private builder Balaji to the poor. Having witnessed over the past few days the now iconic picture of a bulldozer running down the Prayagraj house of parents of female Muslim student and activist Afreen Fatima, who participated in the anti-Citizenship Amendment Act and National Register of Citizens protests, one is almost tempted to look for a fine print at the bottom of the page to the effect that the promise of house is subject to the condition that one doesn't participate in any anti-government protest otherwis

Church in India: Rooted in patriarchy, Pope Francis-initiated reforms remain on paper

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  It is ‘Laity Sunday’ once again on June 26! A time for the Church once again to introspect and to see whether the much flaunted ‘lay collaboration’ actually exists in reality or not! In a highly clerical and patriarchal Church, which has stubbornly refused to accept in toto the changes envisaged by Vatican II and as desired by the then Popes John XXIII and Paul VI, introducing any reforms is certainly very difficult. But Pope Francis, in his typical style, is apparently succeeding in doing so! On March 19, 2022 (Feast of St Joseph) the ninth anniversary of the formal inauguration of his pontificate, he published Praedicate Evangelium (Preach the Gospel),his new constitution for the restructuring of the Vatican Curia. It was a reform that was promised at the beginning of his pontificate; several aspects of it have already been implemented over the years. The final document, however, does make some significant changes and provides the vision of a Curia that

'Highly abnormal': AltNews journo's arrest suggests 'deterioration in media freedom'

By Bharat Dogra*  Leading media organizations have come out in strong support of recently arrested journalist Mohammed Zubair. These organizations include, among others, the Editors Guild of India, the Press Club of India, the Delhi Union of Journalists and DIGIPUB, a platform for several important digital media organizations. All these organizations have condemned the recent arrest of the noted journalist and demanded his immediate release. While leading human rights organizations and political parties have also made somewhat similar statements, the strong support of media organizations is particularly important as the effort of the authorities has been to try to present the arrested journalist as someone who has been indulging in irresponsible journalism.  In such a situation the support of those media organizations who are familiar with his work and who are most capable of judging the quality of his work is very important. In this context it is important that some media organization