Skip to main content

Warning bell for Gandhians: Social media trends praise Godse, call Mahatma casteist, racist

By Rajiv Shah 
As I was scanning through Sabrang India, a website run by well-known human rights activist Teesta Setalvad, I came across a post pointing towards how, on the Gandhi Jayanti day, #नाथूराम_गोडसे_जिंदाबाद (#Nathram_Godse_Zindabad) was trending on Twitter. I don’t know if it was among the top trends of the day, but what is interesting is, while some of the those who were posting anti-Gandhi tweets praising Gandhi’s murderer, others called Gandhi racist and casteist, still others blaming him for India's partition. 
Thus, a Facebook friend, who has been showing extreme sensitivity towards caste violence shared a story of what an Indian American Dalit writer Sujatha Gidla, speaking at the Jaipur Literature Festival said on January 29, 2018 -- that Gandhi was a “casteist and racist”, that he wanted to “preserve the caste system and paid lip service to Dalit upliftment for political gain.” Gilda added, “Gandhi only wished to ‘prettify’ the caste system, and abolish it.”
In yet another example, another FB friend, who as an excellent journalist has never cared to compromise with the powers-that-be, appeared to state what many in the saffron brigade have long been suggesting – that Gandhi is responsible for India’s partition. This FB friend, whom I have known intimately, wondered why “everybody” was “going ga ga” on the Gandhi Jayanti day. “Why?”, he asked.
“Is he not the man whose freedom movement resulted in partition and massive displacement of people from Sindh, Punjab and Bengal?” the FB post said, insisting, Gandhi “can never qualify to be an Indian icon”, that he “only appealed to the colonialists, who never saw a nanga faqir like this”, though ended by saying, “By the way I do not owe allegiance to the Sanghis.”
Meanwhile, a little-known Gujarati news portal, Mera News, edited by one of the best Gujarati journalists, Prashant Dayal, commenting on social media attacks Gandhi, wondered why have we come a point when anyone calling Gandhi names is taken as a norm, but if you criticise goondas, you are not spared. It added, those who put out posts calling Gandhi names have never ever cared to read a page of history of Indian freedom struggle.
Very true. But surely it’s a dangerous trend, infecting even Dalit rights activists. A case in point is a well-known grassroots Valmiki social activist, whom I have known for about five or six years. What this Valmiki activist, who has been taking up the cause of manual scavengers in Gujarat, said in his FB post about three years ago should serve as a warning bell for Gandhians of all hues, suggesting towards a dangerous trend taking shape, accelerated amidst a sharp upswing of information explosion, especially through the social media.
This Dalit rights activist, justifying Nathuram Godse murdering Mahatma Gandhi, said on October 3, 2017, said, he had gone to a Dalit rally in Dholka, where he came to know “for the first time how Gandhi pressured Babasaheb Ambedkar into giving up the demand for separate electorate for Dalits, allowing us to elect our own representatives to legislatures."
"Gandhi betrayed us Dalits. This was pretty evident. This angered me. Why did Gandhi, who is called a Mahatma, blackmail Ambedkar like this this? In my angry mood, I began surfing FB, and I found on that day a post justifying Godse killing Gandhi. I copied it and posted it on my timeline", he told me, though adding, I didn't know the implications, when brought to light, he decided to delete the FB post.

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”