Skip to main content

Delhi riots: Even British didn't accuse Bhagat Singh of reading Lenin, Jack London

By Vikash Narain Rai*

After the #BlackLifeMatters movement seriously tested the credibility of police across America, the Houston police chief Art Acevado talked of ending “lawful but awful” policing. No comparison, but in India, a citizens’ committee comprising former top judges and bureaucrats is now set to inquire into the role of the state machinery and media in handling the February 2020 Delhi violence, which followed protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), “as the investigation by the Delhi Police has evoked extensive critical commentary in recent times.”
Delhi Police’s mentioning of the well-known anti-CAA personalities, the likes of CPI-M general secretary Sitaram Yechury, Swaraj Abhiyan leader Yogendra Yadav, economist Jayati Ghosh, documentary filmmaker Rahul Roy, langar organiser DS Bindra and certain student activists of the Jamia Millia Islamia and the Jawharlal Nehru University (JNU), in the context of the February riots, is most baffling. Even the colonial India police would not have linked them with the communal violence that claimed 53 lives the way the Delhi Police have. They have concluded that a momentum to support the protest and a conspiracy to engineer violence are invariably in continuum.
Following a call for Satyagraha against the Rowlatt Act and the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, non-cooperation movement was launched by Mahatma Gandhi in September 1920 against the British rule. It was called off suddenly in February 1922 when violence broke out at Chauri Chaura, Gorakhpur, which led to the death of 3 civilians and 22 policemen.
Neither Gandhi nor any other leading figure of the movement were among the 228 people brought to trial. The indomitable Bhagat Singh, who went to gallows in March 1931 for killing a British police officer, was never charged for reading books by Lenin and Jack London, as the Delhi police have chargesheeted student activists at the protest sites. They have been charged under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), and have been accused of possessing left leaning and Pakistan centric literature!
Police is trained to initially view all people in the ecological zone of crime with suspicion. That being their professional conditioning, it should normally guide them in approaching the investigation with a 360-degree mindset. It should leave little scope for a partisan approach the Delhi police is presently being accused of, while narrowing down suspects from the genuine citizens. 
In their chargesheets, they have conceded space for manipulation at the cost of their own reputation. Yogendra Yadav has asserted that not one sentence from his maiden speech at the protest gathering that could implicate him has been quoted by the police.
Let us take a look at one such FIR wherein, typically, the police themselves are the complainant. The FIR No 60, Police Station Dayalpur, North East district, covering clashes between police and protesters at Chand Bagh on February 24, was registered on February 25 for obstructing police, rioting, religious affront, inflicting life-threatening injuries, firearm assault, looting, murder of Delhi Police Head constable Ratan Lal and causing disappearance of evidence. The chargesheet was prepared by a crime branch inspector on June 7, and filed in the court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) in the North-East district. 
Interestingly, the 130-page document, with a bulk of supporting annexures, has been countersigned by the assistant commissioner of police (ACP) of crime branch, in the same date. The FIR and chargesheet both contained accusations under the same set of penal sections as if all the threads were known to the police at the time of filing the FIR, leaving little scope of divergence over the three months of investigation. The chargesheet has listed a total of 17 accused, all Muslim males in the age group 18-48, from the Chand Bag area and immediate neighbourhood. Significantly, none of them have any previous criminal record.
However, there are two differently discernible narratives in the chargesheet. The FIR could not have contained an iron clad account of the ongoing riot when the ground situation had continued to be extremely fluid. As the events would subsequently unfold, these cases were hotly contested to the extent that even the Solicitor General of India (SGI) and his Assistant Solicitor Generals (ASGs) have since represented Delhi Police in various courts. This particular FIR, not to miss the anomaly, has been initiated by a beat constable, best placed to know his limited facts and possessing least overview.
The accused have been charged under UAPA, and the charges include possessing Left and Pakistan centric literature
Constable A Sunil was part of a three-member police station beat team, entrusted to cover the Chand Bagh protests regularly. Their statements indicated an uneasy build up at the protest site on February 23 for participating in a march to Rajghat, culminating into spontaneous clashes on February 24 when the police tried to forcibly contain the protesters on the slip road. One of the police witnesses, Najam Ul Hasan, whose statement was recorded before a judicial magistrate under section 164 CrPC, has mentioned that the henchmen of Kapil Mishra had earlier burnt the protest tent.
There appeared several menacing images of outsiders leading to the violence, which demanded deeper probing by investigators but were selectively ignored. However, an overview feeding to a long-term conspiracy theory has been presented through a four-tier chart in the chargesheet. It presupposes a criminal linkage between the alleged masterminds and activists, interfacing with local organisers, and, consequently, binds them to the violent acts of the rioters.
According to the chargesheet, the local organisers are the persons who set up the protest site and the “local protesters/rioters are the people who resided in the locality of Chand Bagh, common man who visited the protest site to support the protest which was being organized by the local organizers and the conspirators. These people were not regular part of the protests. However, they actively participated in rioting on February 24, 2020 after being instigated by the local organizers.”
As the things stand, the citizens’ committee will be handicapped in not having access to many a revealing official document. However, to lend credence to the investigation, the truth should be tested in transparency. Let the Delhi Police incorporate, through additional chargesheets, what they have withheld all along – the reports submitted by their beat teams since December, their own mandatory videos of the violent incidents, the follow ups to the distress calls received by the police and the transcripts of calls among their cutting-edge functionaries during the riot period. Let the investigation lead the police and not the other way round.
---
*Former IPS officer

Comments

Anonymous said…
Case will go on. Under trial will be in jail. After 10 years they will be found non guilty. When there would be congress government new enquiries will be set up. New commission. After 15 years Kapil Sharma will be found guilty by commission. New case will be filed. He will get bail because he is from bjp. After another 10 years he will be found non guilty by Supreme Court when ther will be bjp/rss government. And he will be chose for the post of ....p......t. .

TRENDING

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Gyanvapi case: Use of 'illegal' lawfare to keep the communal pot simmering

By Venkatesh Narayanan, Bobby Ramakant, Manoj Sarang* With a steady drumbeat of bad news for the lives of ordinary citizens --  inflation at a multi-year high , rupee at an all-time low , negative job creation and when all forward indicators as seen by industry leaders point to recessionary clouds on the horizon , what’s a serially-incompetent government to do?  Dust out their time-tested-citizen-distraction playbook. The Gyanvapi-Masjid case is all of this -- as a weapon of mass distraction. This zeitgeist of our times is best captured by a recent opinion piece : "The idea is to keep the pot on a perpetual boil, simmering at the top, whirling feverishly beneath. A restless society forever living precariously on the precipice arouses distrst, uneasiness, fear and discomfort, That is a toxic panoply for manufacturing rage, which can then be effortlessly mobilized at short notice. BJP is creating an eco-system of real-time instant delivery of hate-mongers. That is how we are sudde

Upholding labour rights, Nehruvian scientific temper, Rajni Patel opposed Emergency

By Harsh Thakor*  Rajni Patel, who died 40 years ago, whatever his flaws, had one great quality: his human touch to offer selfless service and ability to galvanise or influence human beings from all walks of life. Few people would ever go out of the way to help someone or serve as selflessly without aim of personal gain. Rajni championed Nehruvian secular ideas and scientific temper. As a master in public relations he revealed utmost humility. As a barrister, he never appeared against the trade unions or workers. A Fabien Socialist he opposed liberal capitalism and radical socialism. Unlike most lawyers, he did not succumb to the lure of amassing wealth. Rajni was born in Sirsa, in Gujarat, on the very day Gandhi set foot on Indian soil, on 9th January, 1915. He gained his baptism through one of Gandhi's speeches calling for the boycott of foreign goods, which was the virtual turning point of his life. Rajni toed Gandhi to organise boycott of foreign goods. Rajni was able to cros

Targeting mosques, churches: 'Roadmap' for 2025, RSS' centenary year?

416 years old Our Lady of Health Church, Sancoale, Goa  By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  Fascists use manipulative strategies aimed at whipping up sympathy and support from the majority community, to which they normally ‘belong’. They do so in a variety of insidious and subtle ways. In the past few months, they have gone overboard in their efforts to denigrate and demonize minorities in India, particularly Muslims and Christians. They have spewed hate and divisiveness through their venomous speeches; incited people to violence and have effectively used officialdom to further their vested interests. The results are there for all to see: greater polarisation of the majority community in a country which prided itself for its pluralism and diversity. Their meticulously planned agenda is in order to gain absolute power of the country in the 2024 national elections. More so it is also a roadmap towards 2025 when the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) will complete one hundred years of its existence.

Vadodara violence: Fine Arts Faculty alumni raise fingers at Varsity's political appointee

Hasmukh Vaghela with PM Counterview Desk  In a statement, alumni of the Faculty of Fine Arts (FoFA), Maharaja Sayajirao University (MSU), Baroda, Gujarat, referring to the “violence” by right-wing groups for displaying “objectionable” paintings that “hurt religious sentiments” at the one of India’s top fine arts institute May 5, have taken strong exception to “the assault and rustication” of one of the students, and lack of action taken against those who “violated” the institution and committed the act. Floated as an online petition seeking wider support, the FoFA alumni, in their statement, addressed to the vice chancellor, MSU, said, there should be “thorough” investigation in the whole incident and “immediate action” should be taken against syndicate member Hasmukh Vaghela, MSU, who sparked the assault, and “other co-conspirators” for breaching “university code of conduct and unlawful activities committed in broad daylight”. While the alumni statement doesn't say so, Vaghela

UK leader cites Indian farmers' struggle one of top global fights against neoliberal order

Counterview Desk  Jeremy Corbyn, member of the UK Parliament, former leader of the UK Labour Party and founder of the  Peace and Justice Project , in his  inaugural speech to the  Progressive International’s  Summit at the End of the World on May 12, 2022, has said, what is happening across globe suggests that "image of apocalypse -- bombs and raids, oil spills and wildfires, disease and contagion -- is a reality for people across the planet." In an adaptation of his speech, distributed by  Globetrotter , Corbyn, however, said, there are fresh examples action, too -- by Indian farmers forcing Prime Minister Narendra Modi to withdraw three neo-liberal laws;  by workers, communities and activists against the top giant multinational Amazon's "greed and exploitation"; and by Latin American people's struggle to say "no more to the domination by imperialism, the destruction of their communities and the abuse of their environments." Stating that this is n

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

This varsity succumbed to extra-academic mobocracy, 'ignored' Hindutva archives

By Shamsul Islam* Open letter to Sharda University vice-chancellor Sub: Discarding a Question on Linkages of Hindutva with Nazism/Fascism is blatant Academic Dishonesty! Dear Professor Sibaram Khara Saheb, Namaskaar! According to your esteemed University’s portal: “The name of University, 'Sharda' is synonymous to 'Goddess of knowledge and learning-Saraswati'. She is identified with 'veena', an Indian musical instrument and the ‘lotus’, where she resides. The lotus in our logo symbolizes the seat of learning that the University is created for.  "Variety of colours signify the variety of disciplines the university offers and the overlap between petals creating new colours demonstrate the ethos of collaboration between students and teachers of different programme, nationality, creed and colour working towards creating new knowledge…the University's cherished mission to provide education beyond boundaries and to facilitate the students and faculty to achie

Welfare? Govt of India spends just 19% of manual scavengers' rehabilitation budget

By Bharat Dogra*  While the Dalit community has been always known for higher levels of poverty as well as social discrimination, even within the Dalits there is a sub-section known for even worse levels of poverty as well as social discrimination. This is the section which was traditionally involved in manual scavenging. The shocking injustice they have suffered from over the years has been widely recognized leading to a ban on manual scavenging. At the same time there is urgent need for the rehabilitation of those engaged in manual scavenging. Hence a self-employment scheme for the rehabilitation of those engaged in manual scavenging was drawn up. The allocations and the expenditure for this scheme for the last eight years are shown in the Table below: Union Budget for Self-Employment Scheme for Rehabilitation of  Manual Scavengers (in Rs crore) By Budget Estimate we mean the original allocation made when the budget is presented. It is clear from this table that the actual expenditure

A former Modi ally, Prashant Kishor wanted to enter Congress 'on contract, as trader'

By Anand Sahay*  The Congress Party and the election campaigns specialist Prashant Kishor, whose company has done strategic communications for a host of political parties across ideology, should both count themselves lucky that they could not reach an agreement for Kishor to join the party. News reports suggest that the Congress rejected Kishor’s terms. This is not wholly unexpected. People join a party because they are attracted to it, and wish to serve it in any capacity that the party may see fit. But that isn’t Kishor at all. He gave the impression of entering into a contract, as a trader might. If news reports are to be believed, he sought freedom to report directly to party chief Sonia Gandhi, and sought untrammeled control over party communications. When such ideas did not find favour, the consultant withdrew. It is clear he has no particular love for the Congress, and its ideas, ideology and politics. In contrast, look at the key personae in G-23. They