Skip to main content

Modi assured Trump last year India would reduce tariffs on US goods 'substantially'

By Rajiv Shah
Even as the United States declared it was withdrawing its “preferential trade status” accorded to India, facts suggest, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had “assured” US president Donald Trump last year he would work on going soft on “very high tariffs” imposed on American products coming to India. Addressing a White House media conference on October 1, 2018, Trump had said, I had “spoken to Prime Minister Modi, and he is going to reduce them (tariffs) quite substantially.”
Talking to media, Trump – who announced a new trade deal with neighbouring Mexico and Canada, which abrogated the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with the two countries as it allegedly was against US interests leading a loss of billions of dollars – had identified India as one of the countries with whom a new trade deal was under negotiation.
Calling India “tariff king” imposing up to 100 per cent duty on certain goods imported from the US, and expecting a positive response from India, Trump, however, had opined that he was sure Modi would oblige him and reduce the tariff .“My relationship with India is great, with Prime Minister Modi is great, and they are going to start doing a lot. They have already called us to make a deal, we didn't even call them”, the US president had said.
At the media briefing, which lasted for more than one hour, Trump had further said, “India, which is the tariff king… they called us, and they say they want to start negotiations immediately”. The reason he had advanced was, India wanted to keep him happy. “They have to keep us happy, because they understand, they have been wise to keep us happy”, he had added.
Trump had continued, “India charges tariffs of 100 per cent. And if we want to put a tariff of 25 per cent, people from Congress will call, but that's not free trade”, adding, “India charges tremendous tariffs. When we send Harley Davidsons motorcycles, other things to India, they charge very, very high tariffs. And I have spoken to Prime Minister Modi, and he is going to reduce them quite substantially. Nobody ever spoke to these people. He said nobody ever spoke to me.”
Blaming past presidents of his country for this, Trump had said, “I am not trying to be kind of overly dramatic. We have had presidents of the United States and trade representatives; they never spoke to India… They charge us whatever they want… India has a very, very high tariff, they really charge tremendously high tariffs.”
Specifically referring to the Harley Davidson motorcycles, Trump had said, “So you send a motorcycle to India, it's 100 per cent tariff, now that's so high that it is like a barrier, in other words, who is going to buy it? It costs you so much. Now they have already reduced it substantially and it is still too high.”
Trump had ended by stating, “My relationship with India is great, with Prime Minister Modi is great, and they are going to start doing a lot. They have already called us to make a deal, we didn't even call them, they called us to make a deal, which is like shocking to people.”

Options before India

While it is not known if Modi would now negotiate the US following the Trump administration ending India’s classification as a beneficiary developing nation under the Generalised System of Preference (GSP) trade programme, indications are, Indian industry would suffer substantially because of the latest development. US said it took the measure to end India GPS status after “ascertaining” that India has not assured it would provide “fair” and “reasonable” access to its markets.
GPS is the largest and oldest US trade preference programme designed to encourage developing countries by allowing duty-free entry for thousands of products from selected beneficiary nations. Ending India’s beneficiary status, Trump said, “I have determined that India has not assured the US that it will provide equitable and reasonable access to its markets. Accordingly, it is appropriate to terminate India’s designation as a beneficiary developing country effective June 5, 2019.”
The US administration had put India on a 60-day notice period, which ended on May 3. Under the GSP programme, nearly 2,000 products, including auto components and textile materials, can enter the US duty-free. India was the largest beneficiary of the programme in 2017 with $ 5.7 billion in imports to the US given duty-free status.
Meanwhile, in what is being termed as a tame response following the Trump decision to withdraw the preferential status, the Modi government said it would “continue to seek to build strong economic ties with US”. Describing the US announcement "unfortunate", a statement from the Union Ministry of Commerce and Industry said, "India, like the US and other nations shall always uphold its national interest in these matters."

Comments

Rashid Akhtar said…
Modi got delayed due busy in manipulation of elections to win.
Now he will reduce the taxes.
He is back on the destruction of India’s economy and the country in general. 🙏🏼
veerar said…
India is supporting the US Dollar for decades by its anti-Gold Policy ,which makes the Rupee weaker and the Nation poorer.It makes its Trades loss-making and its imports costly[India is essentially an importing nation].
Hence India should be pro-Gold and ask the 312 MT Gold with BoE and BIS to be returned.BoE and BIS swap Gold for suppressing its price thus keeping the US Dollar strong.
PP said…
Sab milibhagat hai. They will waive when he goes to US. Media management.

TRENDING

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.