Skip to main content

RBI "appeases" tech savvy upper class, refuses to remove big penalties affecting poor

Counterview Desk
Even as welcoming Reserve Bank of India's decision to remove RGTS and NEFT transactions the Financial Accountability Network India (FAN India) – a group of civil societies, unions, NGOs and peoples movements – has said that it merely seeks to boost digitalisation and is yet another indicator that the RBI is interested in promoting banking among only a particular class (tech-savvy, urban, middle and upper-middle class).
In a statement, FAN India has said, RBI has ignored the interests of the weaker sections of society, which are affected most due to higher charges on basic services, pointing out that a pilot study conducted by RBI in Mumbai has revealed that over than 25% of the customers are "unhappy with the charges such as penalty on non-maintenance of minimum balance, cash deposit charges at home and non-home branches, cheque return charges (deposited by the customers) and for signature verification."

Text of the statement:

The Financial Accountability Network India (FAN India) welcomes the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI's) decision to remove charges for the Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) and National Electronic Fund Transfer (NEFT) transactions and to form a committee under the chairmanship of Chief Executive Officer, Indian Banks’ Association, to ‘examine the entire gamut of ATM charges and fees.’
As a group of civil societies, unions, NGOs and peoples movements, it has been our longstanding demand from the RBI and the government that it look into the matter of bank charges and take immediate actions to remove all the charges.
While the RBI’s decision on removal of the charges on NEFT and RTGS and setting up a Committee is appreciated, it is important to note here that the RBI has so far stated that all charges levied by the banks are at the discretion of respective banks and that the RBI will not step in. It is a welcome step that the central bank has now recognised the problem of charges levied by banks for providing various services.
We demand that the Committee, that is being set up under the chairmanship of Chief Executive Officer, Indian Banks’ Association, will engage with all the stakeholders, including the affected public, and remove the cap on free transactions from ATMs. We also demand that the RBI does not deal with the charges in piecemeal but scraps all bank charges.
The current decision to ‘boost digitalisation’ is yet another indicator that the RBI is interested in promoting banking among only a particular class (tech-savvy, urban, middle and upper-middle class) while ignoring the interests of the weaker sections of society, which are affected most due to higher charges on basic services.
For instance, the charges for NEFT and RTGS varies from Rs 1 to Rs 5 and Rs 5 to Rs 50 (GST excluded) respectively. These are negligible if one compares them with other charges like a penalty for not the maintaining minimum balance, which varies from Rs 10 to Rs 600, and charges on cash transactions, ranging from Rs 10 to Rs 160, done at bank branches.
Recently, a pilot study conducted by RBI in Mumbai revealed that over than 25 per cent of the customers are unhappy with the charges such as penalty on non-maintenance of minimum balance, cash deposit charges at home and non-home branches, cheque return charges (deposited by the customers) and for signature verification.
These charges have also become an impediment in implementing various welfare schemes being run by the government. Just last week, the Maharashtra government has blamed banks for applying various charges on beneficiaries’ accounts, which is making it difficult for beneficiaries to access the money.
On the one hand, banks are increasing charges levied for providing for banking services for common people to compensate for their losses created by massive non-performing assets, thus hurting mostly the weaker sections of society. And on the other, they are allowing free transactions for online users, again neglecting people still dependent on brick and mortar bank branches for their banking activities.
Moreover, this development has to be seen in the broader context of banking reforms that the current government is planning. The push for digitalisation and putting charges on transactions done at banks will push the people away from brick and mortar banks and will make way for reducing the bank branches, the merger of banks, and consequently reducing the number of bank employees.
Our campaign "No Bank Charges” has witnessed hundreds of people sending postcards and emails to the RBI governor, the Finance Minister, and the Prime Minister demanding to scrap all the bank charges.
Our demands:
  • The committee on ATM charges should be open for consultations and remove the cap on transactions as well as the charges. 
  • RBI does not deal with the charges in piecemeal but scraps all bank charges.
The Financial Accountability Network India (FAN India) – a group of civil societies, unions, NGOs and peoples movements – demands from the RBI and the government that it looks into the matter of bank charges on banking services and take immediate actions to remove all the charges which act against the interest of the people.

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

When tourism meets tribal law: The Vanajangi dispute in Andhra Pradesh

By Palla Trinadha Rao   A writ petition presently before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh has brought into focus an increasingly important question in the governance of tribal regions: can eco-tourism projects in Scheduled Areas be implemented without the consent of the Gram Sabha? The case concerns the establishment of a Community Based Eco-Tourism centre at Vanajangi village in Paderu Mandal of Alluri Sitarama Raju District, a region located within the Scheduled Areas of Andhra Pradesh. 

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

The ultimate all-time ODI XI: A personal selection of icons across eras

By Harsh Thakor* This is my all-time best XI chosen for ODI (One Day International) cricket:  1. Adam Gilchrist (W) – The absolute master blaster who could create the impact of exploding gunpowder with his electrifying strokeplay. No batsman was more intimidating in his era. Often his knocks decided the fate of games as though the result were premeditated. He escalated batting strike rates to surreal realms.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.