Skip to main content

Narmada dam stands like statue, not satiating Kutch-Saurashtra thirst: Medha to Modi

Narmada Bachao Andolan leader Medha Patkar
Counterview Desk
Commenting on the Prime Minister's recent speech in Parliament, top Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar and her colleagues* have said that Narendra Modi's statement on Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) on Narmada river is "rootless and proofless", insisting, the Madhya Pradesh government’s stand on the issue, of inability to provide more water to the dam, is "rational and realistic".
In their strongly-worded critique, they have said that the Prime Minister cannot be expected to act like the chief minister of Gujarat and be callous about lakhs of people in the Narmada valley, their nature and culture.

Text:

In his response to the President’s address in the Lok Sabha, Prime Minister Narendra Modi didn’t forget to refer to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP), which he considers his pet project for himself and his state, Gujarat. He also boasted about the successful completion of the gigantic dam of SSP on the Narmada river.
The dam is no doubt standing like a statue, but the fact is, it has neither served the real purpose of satiating the thirst of the drought-affected Kutch and Saurashtra, as promised, nor have lakhs of people (Adivasis, farmers, fisher people, labourers and others), affected by it been rehabilitated as per the law and demands of justice.
Modi criticized all those who according to him are spreading "false news" about SSP. He was probably referring to both the people from the Narmada valley in Madhya Pradesh and from Gujarat. The latter are left high and dry since they haven’t yet received waters from SSP, which is proving to be a mirage.
As for the people from the valley, in all 30,000 families are still residing on the river bank of Narmada till date, and they certainly cannot be expected to support raising the SSP water level to 139 metres, which is the dam's full reservoir level. They still await rehabilitation, and have the legal right to stay put in their original villages till that happens.
If he is targeting farmers protesting in Gujarat, is he unaware about 481 companies that are being supplied SSP water? This is happening even as farms are still without micro network of canals, which are a prerequisite for getting irrigation water.
Modi has been craving for credit for completing the big dam, ignoring the violations of legal and human rights as also environmental laws. Is this being done unknowingly or deliberately? Does he not know how the Narmada Water Dispute Tribunal (NWDT) award and several Supreme Court verdicts, as also state policies (including that of Gujarat), have provided for rehabilitation, aimed at better standard of living post-resettlement?
Is he ignorant of the fact that whatever rehabilitation has happened is due to 34 years' long people’s struggle? And yet, thousands of families are yet to receive all those benefits, for which state administrations are responsible, with Gujarat providing full financial support?
Is Modi unaware that both Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh governments are bereft of funds, which is a genuine necessity for the enormous balance work for rehabilitation, that was concealed during the legal proceedings at the Apex Court and High Courts?
Instead of taking stock of legal and mandatory responsibility and unattended environmental impacts, which remain uncompensated, too, the Prime Minister seems to be giving a push to Gujarat’s dream of filling the dam without fulfilling the mandate. Within Gujarat, too, the pull and push is more from industries than from ordinary farmers or the drought-affected people.
You, Mr Prime Minister, are no more just a chief minister of Gujarat. Please try to understand the changed position and the related duty you are expected to perform. You have to save the lives and livelihoods of Adivasis, Dalits, farmers, labourers and all who are entitled to an alternative life and livelihood with shelter and amenities, when displaced.
And you can’t call the assertion of the present Congress government of Madhya Pradesh, that they can’t fill the waters and create a grave for lakhs of people, to be irrational or political. They have to review all wrong data, decisions and lapses in execution, including corruption, left behind by your counterpart, Shivraj Singh Chouhan. They can’t and will not be permitted to take any decision against their electoral promise, commitment and public interest.
The Prime Minister can’t also hide facts regarding the distribution of benefits. Where is power from SSP, due to be supplied to Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh after investment of crores of rupees?
Why has the power generation reached the lowest in recent years, much less than the magnitude achieved at a much lower (17 metres less) dam height in 2008? Why is it that water shortage, the risk of climate change, as also issues regarding regulation and monitoring of cascade of dams on Narmada, need to taken more seriously today than ever before?
Shouldn't he take into account these factors and bring to the drawing room all the stakeholders and hold a dialogue? Why are environmental laws in the downstream not followed, assuring fisher people and others struggling for a river flowing in order to prevent sea ingress?
Can Gujarat promise 1,500 cusecs of water to be released from the dam to the downstream without any review of the water requirement in the downstream and allocation in the upstream, even as looking into the readiness by the government of Madhya Pradesh for this?
The people from the valley raise these questions for the Prime Minister to respond, as without this, he can’t just claim his big contribution through the ‘51 hours fast’, which was actually a ‘5 star fast’, only to counter 21 days' fast by us, the people from the valley.
The Prime Minister's plan appears to be aimed at violating the NWDT award, to submerge and kick out thousands of families, not follow the known policy decisions undertaken on SSP, and impose Narmada ‘tourism' on a people who have lived an honest, simple and self-reliant life along the river.
We once again pledge to stay put and to drown but not leave our motherland and mother-river without rehabilitation.
---
*Devram Kanera, Wahid Mansuri, Saraswati, Jagdish Patel, Rahul Yadav, Devisingh Tomar, Gokhru Solanki

Comments

TRENDING

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Contempt of court? UP CM taking 'personal vendetta' against Dr Kafeel Khan: Activists

Counterview Desk
Demanding that the Uttar Pradesh government immediately release well-known paediatrician Dr Kafeel Khan, a group of more than 100 academicians, activists, researchers, doctors and lawyers have said in an open letter that he is being “targeted at the behest of the chief minister”, wondering, “When is an act of challenging the government a threat under the National Security Act (NSA)?”

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

ASI has 'no funds' to protect five centuries old Goa church, a World Heritage Site

Counterview Desk
The century-old All-India Catholic Union (AICU), the largest Laity movement in Asia, has blamed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) for neglecting the historic Bom Jesu church by keeping its ceilings  open to the vagaries weather, with no steps  taken to protect the five century old monument from damage on account of impending rains on the lame excuse that there are "no funds". In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, AICU simultaneously asks the Government of India to devise a "comprehensive" national social security safety net, universal health Insurance and medical Infrastructure so that the “calamity” that has befalenl millions of migrant labour and jobless rural and urban poor in “the Covid pandemic-driven lockdown is “never repeated.”

Withdraw sedition charges against three young women activists: 1100 feminists

Counterview Desk
About 1,100 feminists from all over India – organisations and individuals across religion, class, caste, ethnicity, ability, sexuality and genders – have issued a solidarity statement condemning what they have called “the targeted crackdown on Muslims and women activists in Delhi”, who were at the forefront of protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), National Register of Citizens (NRC) and National Population Register (NPR).

Will Govt of India, ICMR end 'perverse' practice of extracting profits from ill-health?

By Asmita Verma, Surabhi Agarwal, Bobby Ramakant*
The Epidemics Act, 1897 gives the central and state governments authority to impose any regulations which may be necessary to contain the outbreak of a disease. Some state governments such as Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhatisgarh have already used this power to bring private healthcare facilities in their state under government control.

Coping with Covid-19? Options before small, marginal farmers of rainfed regions

By Biswanath Sinha, Kuntal Mukherjee*
The global crisis due to Covid-19 has hit after reaching in western Europe. India’s response to curtail the spread of the disease was quite decisive. It announced a Janata curfew on the March 22, followed by a complete national lockdown from the midnight of March 24.

Tablighis or Namaste Trump? Rupani must 'clarify' on origin of Covid-19 in Gujarat

By Mujahid Nafees* In his video communication on April 24, 2020, chief minister Vijay Rupani informed us that in the month of March the Gujarat government had quarantined 6,000 people returning from abroad in order to prevent the spread of Covid-19 pandemic. He further asserted that the spread of Covid-19 was caused by the tablighis returning from Nizamuddin in Delhi. His statements were widely publicized and given front page coverage by some local dailies.

'Violation' of migrant workers' human rights: Legal notice to IIM-A director, govt babus

By Our Representative
Taking strong exception to the police action against protesting migrant workers off the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) on May 18, senior Gujarat High Court advocate Anandvardhan Yagnik, in a legal notice to the IIM-A director "on their behalf" has said that the workers had only been seeking to to go back to their home states, Jharkhand and West Bengal, for the last more than 20 days because they were not paid their “earned wages because of the lockdown.”