National consultation on danger of eviction of lakhs of forest dwellers after July 10

By A Representative
Several civil rights organizations have decided to hold a day-long consultation on forest rights movements and the way forward in New Delhi July 2, 2019 against the backdrop of the fear that lakhs of forest dwellers may again be on the verge of an “existential crisis” after July 10, the date till which the Supreme Court gave a reprieve on February 23 for its controversial February 13 order, directing state governments to evict them if their claims under the Forest Rights Act (FRA) have been rejected.
The consultation will be held to press upon Central and state governments to implement FRA “effectively and unconditionally” in all forest regions, including Critical Forest Areas, even as working out a plan for a united struggle with the “collective initiative” of diverse forest rights organisations/groups and supporters in different walks of life, including journalists, lawyers, researchers, social action groups and others.
The consultation proposes to begin a dialogue with political parties to bring FRA in the mainstream of political discourse so that this historic act can become an important political issue during and after the electoral process. A decision may be taken to form an all-India alliance with organisations/groups, actively engaged in forest rights movement to represent the collective voice and to take forward the task ahead.
To be held at Assam Association, Srimanta Sankaradeva Bhawan, Satsang Vihar Marg, Qutab Institutional Area, the consultation will be preceded by a meeting of the Bhumi Adhikar Andolan on July 1, 2019 which will be critically discussing on the Land Acquisition Act 2013, the various state legislations which has been drafted in this regard.
The organizers of the consultation include Jitendra Choudhary of the Adivasi Adhikar Rashtriya Manch, Hannan Mollah and Prem Singh of the Bhumi Adhikar Andolan, Roma and Ashok Choudhary of the All India Union of Forest Working People, Meera Sanghamitra and Madhuresh Kumar of the National Alliance of People’s Movements, and Shweta, Satyam Shrivastava, Sanjeev Kumar, Anil Varghese of the Delhi Solidarity Group.

Gujarat Sachivalaya blacklists, denies entry to woman social activist: Will NHRC probe?

By Kantilal Parmar* I have approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) seeking an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into a serious incident that took place at the Gujarat Secretariat in Gandhinagar on August 18, 2026. The matter concerns social activist and women’s rights leader Chandrikaben Solanki, who, according to the information available to me, was denied an entry pass to the Secretariat when she went there to meet Gujarat’s Social Justice and Empowerment Minister, Dr. Manishaben Vakil, to raise an issue concerning social justice.

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan* The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.

Counterview

Search This Blog