Skip to main content

Vadodara ravines, wetlands being "systematically destroyed", yet nobody cares

By A Representative
Several prominent Vadodara citizens have in a letter to the city municipal commissioner expressed concern that ravines and wetlands in Gujarat's cultural capital "are being systematically destroyed and filled with debris and municipal solid waste in order to reclaim land for further 'development'."
According to them, "This will further augment the already existing waterlogging and flooding woes in various parts of the city", adding, "We have raised the issues with the concerned authorities, related to prevention anticipated disasters, flooding and water logging due to deliberate negligence". Yet, what they got was "lip service" regarding cleaning up the debris with all kinds of solid waste.
The letter follows a Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) communication to Gujarat government authorities directing them to take steps to protect "the ecology of the wetlands and ravines there through effective waste management" in Vadodara following a complaint by senior environmental activist Rohit Prajapati dated May 22, 2019. The MoEFCC letter asked the state authorities to "send an Action Taken Report to the applicant under intimation to this Ministry.”
The letter, whose copy has been sent to Gujarat and Government of India environment and forest officials, especially identifies Sursagar Redevelopment and Jan Mahal as "prime examples" of such dumping, adding, "The Vadodara Smart City website lists 64 projects with estimated cost of Rs 2,906 crore. An overwhelming 42 of these projects are infrastructure development related projects that will create significant issues of debris."
The letter says, "In spite of recent site visit on April 24 by a committee headed by Chief Justice (Retired) of Delhi High Court Justice BC Patel, Gujarat Pollution Control Board officials and the Vadodara Municipal Corporation, instead of removing the dumped debris, is still allowing dumping of fresh debris, discharge of untreated sewage, filling, levelling, construction, etc. activities along the Vishwamitri River and its environs (banks, ravines, tributaries, ponds, wetlands, etc.)."
Those who have signed the letter include Rohit Prajapati, environmental activist; Neha Sarwate, environmental and urban planner; Dr Ranjitsinh Devkar, zoologist; Dr Shishir R Raval, landscape architect and ecological planner; Dr Deepa Gavali, wetland ecologist; Dr Jitendra Gavali, botanist; Shakti Bhatt, water resources expert; Dr Arjun Singh Mehta, biotechnologist;Dr Jayendra Lakhmapurkar, hydro-geologist, others.

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Right to walk, right to livelihood: Clearing footpaths 'can't mean' clearing out the urban poor

By Aseem Mishra*    India’s cities are locked in a quiet but intensifying struggle over one of their most contested public spaces: the footpath. For pedestrians, a footpath is basic infrastructure—a strip of ground that should allow people to move safely, independently and with dignity. For millions of informal workers, the same stretch of pavement is a workplace, a source of daily income and often the difference between survival and destitution.
10 comments
»

Ample evidence of child labour in South Gujarat's cash rich sugarcane belt: Study

By Rajiv Shah A recent German government-funded study , undertaken jointly by the NGO Prayas Centre for Labour Research and Action and the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, which mainly deals examines the working conditions of migrant workers in the cash-rich sugarcane zone of South Gujarat, has gone a long way to suggest large scale prevalence of child labour during the harvesting season.
1 comment
»

Women lawyers petition Supreme Court, seek reconsideration of Aug 4 order on bar council co-option

By A Representative   A group of women advocates who stood sixth and seventh among female candidates in the recent Bar Council elections have filed a petition before the Supreme Court, seeking a recall and reconsideration of the Court’s August 4 order determining the mechanism for co-opting women into State Bar Councils.
2 comments
»