Skip to main content

Modi assured Trump last year India would reduce tariffs on US goods 'substantially'

By Rajiv Shah
Even as the United States declared it was withdrawing its “preferential trade status” accorded to India, facts suggest, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had “assured” US president Donald Trump last year he would work on going soft on “very high tariffs” imposed on American products coming to India. Addressing a White House media conference on October 1, 2018, Trump had said, I had “spoken to Prime Minister Modi, and he is going to reduce them (tariffs) quite substantially.”
Talking to media, Trump – who announced a new trade deal with neighbouring Mexico and Canada, which abrogated the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with the two countries as it allegedly was against US interests leading a loss of billions of dollars – had identified India as one of the countries with whom a new trade deal was under negotiation.
Calling India “tariff king” imposing up to 100 per cent duty on certain goods imported from the US, and expecting a positive response from India, Trump, however, had opined that he was sure Modi would oblige him and reduce the tariff .“My relationship with India is great, with Prime Minister Modi is great, and they are going to start doing a lot. They have already called us to make a deal, we didn't even call them”, the US president had said.
At the media briefing, which lasted for more than one hour, Trump had further said, “India, which is the tariff king… they called us, and they say they want to start negotiations immediately”. The reason he had advanced was, India wanted to keep him happy. “They have to keep us happy, because they understand, they have been wise to keep us happy”, he had added.
Trump had continued, “India charges tariffs of 100 per cent. And if we want to put a tariff of 25 per cent, people from Congress will call, but that's not free trade”, adding, “India charges tremendous tariffs. When we send Harley Davidsons motorcycles, other things to India, they charge very, very high tariffs. And I have spoken to Prime Minister Modi, and he is going to reduce them quite substantially. Nobody ever spoke to these people. He said nobody ever spoke to me.”
Blaming past presidents of his country for this, Trump had said, “I am not trying to be kind of overly dramatic. We have had presidents of the United States and trade representatives; they never spoke to India… They charge us whatever they want… India has a very, very high tariff, they really charge tremendously high tariffs.”
Specifically referring to the Harley Davidson motorcycles, Trump had said, “So you send a motorcycle to India, it's 100 per cent tariff, now that's so high that it is like a barrier, in other words, who is going to buy it? It costs you so much. Now they have already reduced it substantially and it is still too high.”
Trump had ended by stating, “My relationship with India is great, with Prime Minister Modi is great, and they are going to start doing a lot. They have already called us to make a deal, we didn't even call them, they called us to make a deal, which is like shocking to people.”

Options before India

While it is not known if Modi would now negotiate the US following the Trump administration ending India’s classification as a beneficiary developing nation under the Generalised System of Preference (GSP) trade programme, indications are, Indian industry would suffer substantially because of the latest development. US said it took the measure to end India GPS status after “ascertaining” that India has not assured it would provide “fair” and “reasonable” access to its markets.
GPS is the largest and oldest US trade preference programme designed to encourage developing countries by allowing duty-free entry for thousands of products from selected beneficiary nations. Ending India’s beneficiary status, Trump said, “I have determined that India has not assured the US that it will provide equitable and reasonable access to its markets. Accordingly, it is appropriate to terminate India’s designation as a beneficiary developing country effective June 5, 2019.”
The US administration had put India on a 60-day notice period, which ended on May 3. Under the GSP programme, nearly 2,000 products, including auto components and textile materials, can enter the US duty-free. India was the largest beneficiary of the programme in 2017 with $ 5.7 billion in imports to the US given duty-free status.
Meanwhile, in what is being termed as a tame response following the Trump decision to withdraw the preferential status, the Modi government said it would “continue to seek to build strong economic ties with US”. Describing the US announcement "unfortunate", a statement from the Union Ministry of Commerce and Industry said, "India, like the US and other nations shall always uphold its national interest in these matters."

Comments

Rashid Akhtar said…
Modi got delayed due busy in manipulation of elections to win.
Now he will reduce the taxes.
He is back on the destruction of India’s economy and the country in general. 🙏🏼
veerar said…
India is supporting the US Dollar for decades by its anti-Gold Policy ,which makes the Rupee weaker and the Nation poorer.It makes its Trades loss-making and its imports costly[India is essentially an importing nation].
Hence India should be pro-Gold and ask the 312 MT Gold with BoE and BIS to be returned.BoE and BIS swap Gold for suppressing its price thus keeping the US Dollar strong.
PP said…
Sab milibhagat hai. They will waive when he goes to US. Media management.

TRENDING

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Labelling a Jesuit a Marxist? It's like saying if you use a plane, you become American

Jesuits: Cedric Prakash, Stan Swamy By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ* A thirteen- fourteen-year-old has many dreams! That's an impressionable age; at the cusp of finishing school. It is also a time when one tastes a different kind of freedom: to go for camps with boys of your own age (not with ones family). Such camps and outings were always enjoyed to the hilt. The ones, however, which still remain etched in my memory are the mission camps to the Jesuit missions in Maharashtra and Gujarat.

Did Modi promote Dholavira, a UNESCO site now, as Gujarat CM? Facts don't tally

By Rajiv Shah  As would generally happen, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s tweet – that not only was he “absolutely delighted” with the news of UNESCO tag to Dholavira, but he “ first visited ” the site during his “student days and was mesmerised by the place” – is being doubted by his detractors. None of the two tweets, strangely, even recalls once that it’s a Harappan site in Gujarat.

Giant conglomerates 'favoured': Whither tribal rights for jal-jungle-jameen?

Prafull Samantara By Mohammad Irshad Ansari*  The struggle for “Jal, Jungle and Jameen” has been a long-drawn battle for the tribal communities of India. This tussle was once again in the limelight with the proposed diamond mining in the Buxwaha forest of Chhatarpur (Madhya Pradesh). The only difference in this movement was the massive social media support it gained, which actually seems to tilt the scale for the tribal people in a long time.

If not Modi, then who? Why? I (an ordinary citizen) am there! Main hoon naa!

By Mansee Bal Bhargava*  The number of women ministers is doubled in early July from the first term after cabinet reshuffle by the present government led by Narendra Modi. While there were 06 women ministers in the previous term, this term there are 11. The previous two governments led by Dr Manmohan Singh had 10 women ministers in each tenure. Are these number of women ministers something to rejoice in the near 75 years of independence? Yes maybe, if we think that things are slowly improving in the patriarchal system. This change is less likely to achieve gender balance in the parliament otherwise we require more than 11 as per the 33% reservation . This change is also less likely because the men politicians’ inability to handle the country’s mess is becoming more and more evident and especially during the corona crisis. Seems, the addition of more women ministers may be a result of the recent assembly elections where women played a decisive role in the election results. For example

Tussle between Modi-led BJP govt, Young India 'key to political battle': NAPM

Counterview Desk  In its month-long campaign, civil rights network National Alliance for People’s Movements (NAPM) carried out what it called Young People's Political Persecution and Resistance in “solidarity with all comrades facing political persecution and remembering human rights defender Stan Swamy…”

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Gujarat govt gender insensitive? Cyclone package for fisherfolk 'ignores' poor women

By Our Representative A memorandum submitted to the Gujarat government by various fisherfolk associations of the Saurashtra region of Gujarat under the leadership of Ahmedabad NGO Centre for Social Justice's senior activist Arvind Khuman, who is based in Amreli, has suggested that the relief package offered to the fishermen affected by the Tauktae cyclone is not only inadequate, it is also gender insensitive.

Debt bondage, forced labour, sexual abuse in Gujarat's Bt cottonseed farms: Dutch study

By Rajiv Shah  A just-released study, sponsored by a Netherlands-based non-profit, Arisa , “Seeds of Oppression Wage sharecropping in Bt cottonseed production in Gujarat, India”, has said that a new form of bondage, or forced labour, exists in North India’s Bt cottonseed farms, in which bhagiyas, or wage sharecroppers, are employed against advances and are then often required to work for years together “without regular payment of wages.”

Covid: We failed to stop religious, political events, admits Modi-dharmacharya meet

Counterview Desk An email alert sent by one the 11 participants, Prof Salim Engineer, on behalf of the Dharmik Jan Morcha regarding their "religious leaders' online meet" with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, even as offering "support to meet challenges of Corona pandemic", blames religious congregations, though without naming the Maha Kumbh and other religious events, which apparently were instrumental in the spread of the second wave.