Skip to main content

Transparency? Modi govt "refused" to divulge information on Lokpal selection process

Counterview Desk
The National Campaign for Peoples' Right to Information (NCPRI), in a letter to the Lokpal Selection Committee, which consists of Prime Minister Narendra Modi as its chairperson, and members, chief justice Ranjan Gogoi, Lok Sabha speaker Sumitra Mahajan, and eminent jurist Shri Mukul Rohatgi, has taken strong exception to alleged lack of transparency in the selection of chair and members of the Lokpal.
Appointed in March 2019, based on the recommendations made by the selection committee, chair and members of the Lokpal were appointed, says NCPRI, under the Lokpal & Lokayuktas (L&L) Act, 2013, which states that “the selection committee shall regulate its own procedure in a transparent manner for selecting the Chairperson and Members of the Lokpal.”
"However", contends the letter, "There appears to be no information in the public domain about any process put in place by the selection committee in accordance with section 4(4) of the law. Further, despite the passage of nearly two months since the appointment of chair and members of the Lokpal, relevant information about the selection process has not been made available to people."
"Further", continues the letter, "Information sought under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, including names of applicants, names of candidates recommended by the search committee and minutes of selection committee meetings, has been denied to citizens."
Signed by senior RTI activists Anjali Bhardwaj, Shekhar Singh, Shailesh Gandhi, Nikhil Dey, Venkatesh Nayak, Pankti Jog, Pradip Pradhan, Rakesh Dubbudu, and others, the letter urges the committee to take immediate steps to make public the procedure adopted, if any, to ensure transparency in the selection process as envisaged in section 4(4) of the L&L Act.

Text of the letter:

The Lokpal & Lokayuktas Act 2013 was enacted to set up an independent and empowered anti-corruption institution to tackle cases involving allegations of corruption against public servants, including high level functionaries. We are writing to express our deep concern about the lack of transparency in the process of selection of the Chairperson and Members of the Lokpal.
Sub-section 4 of section 4 of the L&L Act mandates that the Lokpal Selection Committee should regulate its procedure in a transparent manner. The provision states that, “(4) The Selection Committee shall regulate its own procedure in a transparent manner for selecting the Chairperson and Members of the Lokpal.”
Unfortunately, there appears to be no information in the public domain about any process put in place by the Selection Committee in accordance with section 4(4) of the law. Lack of transparency, despite the statutory provision in the L&L Act, was highlighted in the contempt petition filed before the Supreme Court by Common Cause. The bench headed by the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, in its order dated March 7, 2019, held that it was the Court’s considered view that no direction should be issued in this regard and that the matter should be left for determination by the Selection Committee.
The Chair and Members of the Lokpal were subsequently appointed in March 2019. Despite the passage of nearly two months, relevant information about the selection process has not been made available to people. Further, information sought under the Right to Information Act, including names of applicants, names of candidates recommended by the Search Committee and minutes of Selection Committee meetings, has been denied to citizens.
Minutes of meetings of the selection panel were denied stating, “as regards the minutes of the meetings it is submitted that the authorship of such documents which in level dignitaries does not vest in the Department of Personnel & Training and same have been shared as secret documents. Thus copies of the said documents cannot be provided...”
The need for transparency in the appointment process of oversight bodies has been upheld by the Supreme Court in several cases. In February 2019, the Court gave a significant judgment to ensure transparency in the appointment of information commissioners under the RTI Act. It directed the proactive disclosure of details of the selection process, including criteria adopted for short-listing.
Opacity in the process of appointments erodes public trust in institutions. We urge the committee to take immediate steps to make public the procedure adopted, if any, to ensure transparency in the selection process as envisaged in section 4(4) of the L&L Act. Further, we request the committee to ensure that all relevant information related to the appointment of the Chair and Members of the Lokpal made in March 2019, including particulars of applicants, shortlisting criteria, minutes of meetings of the Search and Selection Committee and material showing how the selected candidates fulfil the eligibility criteria, also be placed in the public domain to enable scrutiny of the appointment process.
We hope you will urgently take note of the issues highlighted above and take appropriate action.

Comments

TRENDING

Banned? Indian ports 'received' 38 US plastic waste containers reexported from Indonesia

By Rajiv Shah
An Indonesia-based international environmental watchdog group has dug out what it has called “a global pollution shell game”, stating how officials in Indonesia approved re-exports of “illegal” US waste shipments containing plastics mainly to India, as also to other Asian countries -- Thailand, South Korea and Vietnam -- instead of returning them to the US “as promised.”

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.

Cops' 'inability' to deliver justice? Model Gujarat ranks 12th among 18 major states

By Rajiv Shah
A Tata Trusts study, released in Delhi on Thursday, has ranked “model” Gujarat 12th out of 18 major states it has analysed across India to “assess” the police's capacity to deliver justice. Several of the advanced states such as Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Punjab, Haryana, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana as well as some of the so-called Bimaru states such as Odisha, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh are found to have ranked better than Gujarat.

Visually challenged lady seeks appointment with Gujarat CM, is 'unofficially' detained

By Pankti Jog*
It was a usual noon of November 10. I got a phone call on our Right to Information (RTI) helpline No 9924085000 from Ranjanben of Khambhat, narrating her “disgraceful” experience after she had requested for an appointment with Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani. She wanted to meet Rupani, on tour of the Khambhat area in Central Gujarat as part of his Janvikas Jumbesh (Campaign for Development).

People's pressure? GPCB mining cancellation 'notice' to top cement unit in Gujarat

By Sagar Rabari*
Environmental Clearance (EC) was given to Ultratech Cement Co Ltd for limestone mining in villages Talli and Bambhor of Talaja taluka in Bhavnagar district of Gujarat on January 5, 2017. EC was issued ignoring, overriding and undermining opposition from local farmers to mining activity in the area. The mining in these two villages covers an area of 193.3268 hectares (ha), while the entire project is spread over an area of 1,715.1311 ha.

Bullet train acquisition: Land holding worth Rs 1.5 crore, Gujarat govt 'offer' Rs 8 lakh

By RK Misra*
Foundation stones laid by Prime Minister Narendra Modi litter India’s cities, towns and villages, but there are few projects which he has pursued with such perseverance and tenacity as the Ahmedabad-Mumbai bullet train one. However, the overwhelming state power notwithstanding, the farmers, whose lands are being acquired for the Modi government’s dream project, have no plans to give up the fight.

Violent 'Ajodhya' campaign in 1840s after British captured Kabul, destroyed Jama Masjid

Counterview Desk  Irfan Ahmad, professor at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany, and author of “Islamism and Democracy in India” (Princeton University Press, 2009), short-listed for the 2011 International Convention of Asian Scholars Book Prize for the best study in Social Sciences, in his "initial thoughts" on the Supreme Court judgment on the Babri-Jam Janmaboomi dispute has said, while order was “lawful”, it was also “awful.”