Skip to main content

NDA win decisive, but "questions" remain: Joblessness, farm crisis, lower GDP

By Prof Ujjwal K Chowdhury
It is a decisive win for Prime Minister Narendra Modi, BJP and NDA. And we need to explore the reasons too. As for the Congress-led UPA, the situation appears only a little better than what it hitherto was. And as for the regional parties, they seem to be on the decline, except for the YSR Congress in Andhra, the BJD in Odisha, the TRS in Telengana and the DMK in Tamil Nadu (largely in South India). The Left is totally left out.

What explains the opposition campaign fizzling out?

The critical strong points of the Congress challenge were all mistimed. The appreciable manifesto and its core proposal of NYAY (the basic minimum income for the marginalized) were late in the day, and could not be communicated well to the grassroots by the party which had little in the form of organized grassroots apparatus and always dependent on mass media to do its talking, which the media in this election was not willing to, being heavily influenced by those in power.
Secondly, Priyanka Gandhi coming late did not very much help beyond enthusing the Uttar Pradesh Congress cadre; she did not contest and did not even campaign in states where the Congress had just came into power (Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan). This was a crucial mistake. Even MP strongman Jyotiraditya Scindia -- engaging largely in western UP due to Kamal Nath's antagonism towards him -- was a poor strategy.
Thirdly, the collective opposition to communal politics and polarization of BJP could not be forged by the opposition. The Congress floundered badly in forging an alliance in Bengal (with Left or Trinamool Congress), Haryana (with Jannayak Janta Party and Aam Admi Party), Delhi (with AAP) and UP (with Samajwadi Party-Bahujan Samaj Party). The need was for all to combat BJP and not restricting each other's sphere of influence.
And finally, absence of a single face of the opposition and lack of a coherent national strategy of all anti-BJP forces are so telling in the total tally. Leaving the three critical newly won states of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh purely to the local satraps and away from a national strategy of joint opposition, was a crucial mistake of Rahul Gandhi. The Congress did not work to consolidate its strong points, and was wobbling to fight in the weaker pockets, except for Kerala.

What explains the clear win of BJP-led NDA?

Surely, a new set of social coalitions has been evolved by the Sangh Parivar which also involves Dalits and other backward classes (OBCs) contrary to the expectations before the elections.
The UP fiasco of the opposition shows that transfer of votes between SP and BSP did not happen and BJP could garner a large part of the votes of non-Jatav Dalits and non-Yadav OBCs. BJP could also polarize a large part of the Hindu voters in Bengal and central India, irrespective of castes, either on local issues against the chief ministers there, or on issues of nationalism and Modi's leadership.
Then, the use and abuse of the Election Commission with selective measures against opposition leaders, of the Enforcement Directorate with raids only in the homes and offices of opposition leaders while far larger amounts were being spent by the ruling party and its candidates, the CBI with investigations at crucial times against selected opposition leaders, the valour and sacrifice of the army during Pulwama and Balakot episodes, selective denial of facts as seen in case of an Indian Air Force mistaken attack on its own aircraft killing soldiers and destroying the aircraft, spread of several fake news and videos, to the extent of attempting to manage the election process with faulty EVMs at many places and change EVM machines as well: also paid off for BJP to ensure the final results.
These criticisms cannot be totally brushed under the carpet in the moment of NDA glory for the sake of future of Indian democracy (and, for records, let me note, Indira Congress did manipulate elections grossly during its heyday in the past, too).
Needless to say, no single opposition face for the Prime Minister's position, no coherent opposition national strategy, coupled with mobilization of the entire Sangh Parivar nationally, and blatant religious polarization on majoritarian identity grounds helped BJP ride the tide of a critical economic situation and failure on macro-economic fronts with joblessness, farm crisis, lower GDP and per capita growth than pre-2014 times, negative impact of demonetization and GST etc., writ large on the nation's face, which have also been mentioned by the BJP Rajya Sabha MP, Subramaniam Swamy, in his latest tweet, even while congratulating the party for the win.

What lies ahead hereafter?

While the de jure constitutional system of Indian polity is parliamentary a la British type, in effect and de facto India is turning into a presidential form of a polity (if still not so in governance) a la American type. This may further be consolidated.
We may find constitutional amendments agalore, with regard to Articles 370, 35A, form of government, the goals of socialism and secularism in the preamble of the Constitution, etc. There can be newer laws regarding triple talaq, mandir construction, national citizens' registry and citizenship, sedition et al. These may further divide the society as well.
As for the opposition, regional parties, following their setback, may consider consolidation with the forces behind and around the Congress. Though the Congress influence is limited, a divided opposition, riddled with caste and regional divisions, can never challenge BJP on its own.
Even within NDA, BJP will usurp the politics of Shiv Sena, as both hinge on Hindutva, and of the Janata Dal (United), as Nitish Kumar's personal pull and effectiveness have come down drastically, and it is BJP which appears all set to be the leading partner in Bihar and Maharashtra.
Now that political consolidation of power is almost complete across most of India for BJP, the theatre of political high drama will turn to be the south of India, where BJP is expected to replace the Left as the main opposition in Kerala, work in tandem with YSR Congress in Andhra Pradesh and TRS in Telengana, and aim to oust the Congress-JDS government in Karnataka by fair or foul means.
Also in Tamil Nadu, AIADMK will further degenerate and will play second fiddle to BJP going ahead for its limited relevance. Even BJD in Odisha will come to a broad understanding with BJP in the interests of the state, for now.
Further, Delhi and Bengal will be theatre of high drama, with state elections round the corner within a year or so. Expect a bigger round of violence in Bengal ahead, with competitive violence and communalism of both the incumbent TMC and the challenger BJP not willing to give an inch to each other.
Expect AAP to go for a pitched battle for the mind of Delhi electorate with its governance track-record vis-a-vis BJP pledging Central support, if elected to power.
Also, it is expected that the Modi Government 2.0 will have a much different composition of its council of ministers. And it will be interesting to note the new set of ministers who are expected to be younger, on one side, and more pliant to the Modi-Amit Shah leadership on the other.

Comments

TRENDING

Impact of state repression? Kashmir's 65% people prefer independence: Cambridge study

By Rajiv Shah 
Even as the Government of India’s controversial move to abrogate Article 370 of the Constitution and bifurcate Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) into two union territories is not only refusing to down die but has acquired international dimensions, a recent study, published by the Cambridge University Press, has claimed “pro-independence attitudes” among that 65% of Kashmiris, warning, this sentiment worsens when the state machinery resorts “repressive violence”.

Hindus to be 'sent' to Kashmir? Despite Israeli settlements, peace eludes the region

By Anand K Sahay*
Curfew, news and communications blackout, transportation shut-down... News reports from Kashmir are worrying. So are the views relayed through the media, especially television. Old-fashioned repression seems to be consorting comfortably with expressions of concern “for our Kashmiri brethren”. We are looking at Orwell’s 1984 in the making.

Dholera 'inundated': Gujarat govt tries selling low lying area as top smart city site

Counterview Desk
Even as the Dholera Special Investment Region Regional Development Authority (DSIRDA) of the Gujarat government was busy organising a junket for Gujarat-based journalists for the area sought to be sold as an ideal special investment region (SIR) for industrialists, well-known farmers' activist Sagar Rabari has wondered why no investor has so far agreed to put in money in an area situated in Ahmedabad district along the Gulf of Khambhat.

Congress' anti-democratic laws led to Modi govt's 'Constitutional' changes: Scholars

Counterview Desk
A large number of academics* said to be belonging to several Indian and international institutions, even as taking strong exception to the Narendra Modi government's alleged move to amend the Constitution through "illegitimate" means, have taken strong exception to their colleagues in academia who we have become "all too accustomed to adopting a calculated silence in the face of such indignities."

Kashmir normal? Schoolboys, teenagers being arbitrarily picked up, detained: Report

Counterview Desk
A four-person team, consisting of Jean Dr├Ęze, well-known development economist; Kavita Krishnan, who is with the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist); Maimoona Mollah of the All India Democratic Women's Association (AIDWA); and Vimal Bhai of the National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), back from a five-day fact-finding mission (August 9-13) from Kashmir, has said that people they spoke to “expressed their pain, anger, and sense of betrayal against the Government of India.”
In a report, “Kashmir Caged”, released along with a short eight-minute film, they said, the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A, dissolution of the state of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), and bifurcating it into two Union Territories, is not being supported by anyone they met, except for BJP spokesperson on Kashmir affairs Ashwani Kumar Chrungoo, who claimed 46% vote share in J&K.
Excerpts from the report: When our flight landed, and the airlines staff announced that passeng…

Modi's Gujarati mind? Why govt move to 'sell-off' defence PSUs isn't in national interest

By Sandeep Pandey*
The Standing Committee on Defence, 2017-18, of the 16th Lok Sabha highlights the idea of Buy Indian-IDDM (Indigenously Designed Developed and Manufactured). The Committee expressed concern over the import content of equipments produced and developed by Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), Ordnance Factories (OFs) and defence Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) because of the dependence it creates for military hardware on foreign suppliers.

Central Gujarat effluent channel 'releasing' highly polluted industrial wastewater: PM told

Counterview Desk
Senior environmentalists of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti (PSS), Vadodara, Rohit Prajapati and Krishnakant, in an open letter to the Prime Minister, the Gujarat chief minister, the Gujarat chief secretary, and senior Government of India and Gujarat government officials dealing with environment, pollution and climate change have said that the authorities’ response their pleas to take action against the leakages and flow of polluted wastewater from the effluent channels of Central Gujarat industrial areas has met with complete inertia.

Can't go to court with RTI information, rule Ahmedabad authorities: Kankaria accident

By Pankti Jog*
In a shocking reply to an application filed by me, the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) authorities have said that the information provided under the Right to Information (RT) Act should be used in court or in a judicial process. The Act is known to be a major tool that enables citizens to seek certified copies of documents, records from any public authority of state and Central government within 30 days, as per provisions of the Act.

Quit India Movement 'betrayal' and dubious role of Hindu Mahasabha, RSS leaders

By Shamsul Islam*
After the recent guillotine of Article 370, Hindutva ideologue Ram Madhav, while celebrating the occasion stated that it was honouring of the sacrifices of Dr Shyam Prasad Mukherjee and thousands others who laid down their lives for its removal. It is to be noted that Dr Mukherjee was a cadre of RSS and was groomed into a Hindutva leader by another Hindutva icon, VD Savarkar.

Strategy for united struggle against Hindutva 'fascism': Ideological silence is 'no option'

By Dr Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
Electoral alliance and opportunism of national and regional political parties, neoliberal economic marginalisation and soft secular Hindutva line pandering to Hindu majoritarianism laid the foundation of Hindutva fascism in post-colonial India.