Skip to main content

Modi's cloud theory: Why do intellectuals, elites "support" such irrational thinking?

By Sheshu Babu*
"The backward classes have come to realise that after all education is the greatest material benefit for which they can fight....' -- Dr BR Ambedkar
Past few years have seen the rise of many 'educated' persons supporting statements of politicians who propagate irrational and/ or unscientific ideas. Whether 'pushpak vimaan' being discovered long before present planes or 'Rama setu' bridge, despite questionable scientific explanation, many academicians and scientists have been supporting and trying to 'logically' prove their correctness in every way possible.
The Hindu right has made a virtue of anti-intellectualism, ignorance, and fake news/ propaganda in the last 5 years. A tweet on the matter by Nissim Mannathukkaren, department chair, associate professor, development studies, Dalhousie University, Canada, says, "...The joke is on the ' educated' elite/ middle class supporters of Modi who have made idiocy and ignorance fashionable."
Mannathukkaren explains, "Rather than reduce this to the personality of Modi or his lack of knowledge, I am more interested in the fact ... and how people have been asked to believe the most illogical irrational, untruthful statements coming out, especially from the PM". 
He also elaborates on the Balakot strikes and Modi's cloud theory. It is well known how the mainstream media is propagating such absurd statements.
Why are the elites/ intellectuals supporting such irrational thinking? One reason may be that the right wing party is essentially a pro-rich, pro-upper caste, and these 'educated' persons expect to derive some additional benefits.
Though there may be some persons from backward classes, Dalits, marginalised sections, Muslim and Christians, women, etc. joining the group supporting BJP, large chunk of upper castes, specially Brahminical castes, feel secure in the right-wing rule (backed by Hindutva forces) rather than a 'secular ' party leaning towards left or having a soft corner for poor.
Another reason could be the availability of technology. Rich and middle class have the access of modern gadgets like smart phones, laptops, computers, etc. These elites feel insecure as assertion by Dalits, Adivasis, marginalised sections, Muslims, etc. increases, and they express their disapproval by supporting absurd statements, which indirectly help in maintaining existing the Brahminical status quo which is on the verge of falling apart.
Poorer sections rarely have access to modern technology. Domestic workers, servants, farmers, small artisans, etc. have little money to purchase these, as they are concerned with their daily bread earning jobs. Hence, their voice is not heard as widely as that of the elite.
A major reason is shutting up of logical and truthful thinking. Over the last five years, most of the institutions have been placed in the hand of right-wing Hindutva intellectuals, who are adept in completely muzzling expression of counter-ideas and questioning. The entry of marginalised section into premier institutions is made tough and mostly difficult so that power of upper castes is not diluted.
In this situation, the oppressed and exploited are being pushed further backwards. There is an invisible undercurrent of promoting old idea of Brahminism and suppressing lower castes in this scheme of things. A drastic change in the system is necessary.
The so-called educated persons' absurdity should be countered by consistent rebuttals by giving quick responses. Both technical devices like computers, smart phones, etc. should be used to stop social media spreading lies and false unscientific ideas, as well as mass movement campaigns should be held in nook and corner of the country.
There are many indications of Hindutva forces gaining power after elections. They do not hesitate to manipulate any situation, even electoral machines. They have the backing of the powerful rich, Brahminical class to assist. Therefore, Dalits, backward classes, Muslim and other minorities should join hands to thwart Hindutva fascist forces by proactive movement towards alternative politics which transfers economic and political power from upper caste/ class to the poor and the downtrodden.
---
*The writer from everywhere and anywhere supports scientific education

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.