Skip to main content

Gujarat advocates' "rare upsurge" against controversial transfer of a top judge

Justice Akil Kureshi
By RK Misra*
In a rare show of solidarity over the transfer of Justice Akil Kureshi to Bombay High Court, the Bar in the Western India state of Gujarat went on strike and relented only after a meeting with Chief Justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi. Rarely has the transfer of a High Court judge created the sort of upsurge in the legal fraternity in Gujarat as was witnessed when Justice Akil Kureshi was moved to Bombay. The Bar struck work, and in one voice urged the apex court to reconsider it’s decision.
On October 29, the Supreme Court Collegium had recommended transfer of Justice Kureshi, the second most senior judge of the Gujarat High Court to the Bombay High Court. It also cleared the elevation of Gujarat High Court chief justice R Subhash Reddy as a Supreme Court judge. 
Ideally, after justice Reddy’s promotion, Justice Kureshi should have been made acting chief justice. But on November 1, the Centre issued a notification appointing Justice A Dave to this post and asked Justice Kureshi to take charge in Mumbai on or before November 15.
On November 2, the government issued a fresh notification, ’in supersession’ of the earlier one, and appointed justice Kureshi to perform the duties of the chief justice of the Gujarat High Court till this transfer. So, in effect, Justice Kureshi was acting chief justice only for a very short time.
This reportedly came about after the chief justice of India (CJI) took up the matter with the government. On November 3, in an interaction with the media in the Supreme Court press lounge, Chief Justice Gogoi admitted the ‘mistake’ and said that it has been ‘corrected’. "Mistakes do happen”, he said.
No sooner was it known that Justice Kureshi has been transferred to Mumbai, speculation was rife in legal circles that the move to transfer him was done by the government to prevent him from taking over as the acting chief justice of the Gujarat High Court.
The Gujarat High Court Advocates Association (GHAA) called an urgent meeting immediately after the news of his transfer on November 1, and passed a unanimous decision stating that it finds no reason to justify his transfer from senior-most puisne judge of the Gujarat High Court to number five in the Bombay High Court 'ostensibly in the interest of better administration of justice’.
The resolution said that the "Bar believes that such a transfer is unjustified and certainly has no connection with better administration of justice. On the contrary it impinges on the independence of the judiciary. It also resolved to deprecate and condemn the transfer.” The transfer is totally unwarranted, uncalled for and unjust . Not only did it decide to strike work indefinitely but the association also decided to challenge the transfer through a writ petition.
Said Yatin Oza, president of GHAA, “The urgent meeting saw a record attendance and feelings of injustice to a judge of immaculate professional credentials ran strong in the gathered members”.
Twenty senior advocates of the Gujarat High Court in a letter also made an impassioned plea to the five member Supreme Court collegium to reconsider the transfer decision. 
The advocates included, among others, Krishnakant Vakharia, Bhalchandra Shah, Vasuben P Shah, Shirish Sanjanwala, Mihir Thakore, Yatin Oza, Saurabh Soparkar, Mihir Joshi, Prashant Desai, Rustom Marshall, Manish Bhatt, Yogesh Lakhani, Percy Kavina, Deven Parikh, Rashesh Sanjanwala, Dhaval Dave, Shalin Mehta, Mehul Shah, Anshin Desai and Navin Pahwa. All big legal names in Gujarat.
The letter stated that Justice Kureshi is currently the senior most judge of the Gujarat High Court after Justice MR Shah who has been recommended for elevation to the Supreme Court and Justice KS Jhaveri who is currently the chief justice of the Orissa High Court. 
"He is one of the finest judges of the High court who is well respected for his intellect as well as for his dignified conduct both on and off the Bench. Even a brief look at his judgements would make it apparent that he decides without fear or favour as indeed every judge must."
The letter points out that there were whispers going around for quite some time that Justice Kureshi would be sidelined because many of his judgements did not find favour with the present dispensation.
”The sudden transfer of a senior judge, otherwise in line for appointment as acting chief justice of our court to puisne judge at number five in seniority in another court, sends an absolutely wrong signal, affects morale of independent judges and does great disservice to the institution”, the letter said.
It reiterated that in the past, the country has witnessed attempts by an assertive Executive to subvert and overwhelm the judiciary as it was the only institution which could rein in their misuse of power.
"An individual judge wages a lonely battle at great sacrifice and risk. If at times like these, the institution does not stand behind a judge as his or her pillar of strength and lend support, it would be failing in it’s constitutional duty at a crucial moment in our country’s history”, it stated.
The GHCAA president who along with his office bearers called on Chief Justice Gogoi and had more than an hour’s meeting, refused to divulge the details, but said that their decision to postpone their strike should be indicative enough. "The meeting was constructive”, he added.
Lawyers, across the board, have nothing but praise for Justice Kureshi. "Even as a lawyer, soft spoken Justice Kureshi’ s integrity was above board. He is a rock solid judicial person. It has never mattered to him who a person is, whether you are the junior-most or the senior-most. He is a judge of meticulous credentials, unimpeachable integrity and unassailable grace”, is how veteran legal luminary Krishnakant Vakharia describes him. Another legal veteran, Sudhir Nanavaty too had nothing but praise for him.
Senior advocate and former president of the Supreme Court Bar association Dushyant Dave termed the transfer of justice Kureshi as the last straw on the camel’s back and voiced concern whether the judiciary could recover from this move to assert its strong independence and impartiality, at least in Gujarat.
"One really wishes that the Collegium, especially of the extraordinary caliber as at present, would venture to cross-check the input or materials that concerned authorities may have placed before the collegium from independent sources, especially members of the Bar and former Supreme Court judges who came from Gujarat high court”, he stated.
Oza said that Justice Kureshi was being penalized by the present government for his judicial pronouncements. These pertained to the lokayukta case in which he had ruled against the Narendra Modi- led Gujarat government by upholding the decision of the governor in appointing retired Gujarat High Court judge RA Mehta to the post and for his decision to send Amit Shah, now BJP president, to judicial custody in the Sohrabuddin alleged fake encounter case. 
"The lokayukta order of the Gujarat High Court was subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court”, he points out. Numerous other lawyers echo this line of thought.
On his part, Justice Kureshi remains unperturbed. He has shunned all media efforts to seek out his views and dutifully joined his new charge in Mumbai.
The highly respected judicial officer has a Gandhian legacy. His grandfather, Abdul Kadir Bawazeer, was a close friend and lifelong associate of Mahatma Gandhi and came to India along with him from South Africa. His father, Hamid Kureshi was born in the Sabarmati Ashram and grew up playing in the lap of the Mahatma. 
He was a Gujarat High Court advocate and was the head of the Sabarmati Ashram Preservation and Memorial Trust. He passed away in 2016. In keeping with his last wishes, he was cremated as he did not desire to waste space which would otherwise go in the ritual burial.
With such an illustrious legacy, it is no wonder that Justice Kureshi too has made a mark in his field.
---
*Senior Gujarat-based journalist. Blog: Wordsmiths & Newsplumbers

Comments

Uma Sheth said…
Kudos to the legal fraternity and I hope better sense prevails in the powers that be.

TRENDING

Impact of state repression? Kashmir's 65% people prefer independence: Cambridge study

By Rajiv Shah 
Even as the Government of India’s controversial move to abrogate Article 370 of the Constitution and bifurcate Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) into two union territories is not only refusing to down die but has acquired international dimensions, a recent study, published by the Cambridge University Press, has claimed “pro-independence attitudes” among that 65% of Kashmiris, warning, this sentiment worsens when the state machinery resorts “repressive violence”.

Hindus to be 'sent' to Kashmir? Despite Israeli settlements, peace eludes the region

By Anand K Sahay*
Curfew, news and communications blackout, transportation shut-down... News reports from Kashmir are worrying. So are the views relayed through the media, especially television. Old-fashioned repression seems to be consorting comfortably with expressions of concern “for our Kashmiri brethren”. We are looking at Orwell’s 1984 in the making.

Dholera 'inundated': Gujarat govt tries selling low lying area as top smart city site

Counterview Desk
Even as the Dholera Special Investment Region Regional Development Authority (DSIRDA) of the Gujarat government was busy organising a junket for Gujarat-based journalists for the area sought to be sold as an ideal special investment region (SIR) for industrialists, well-known farmers' activist Sagar Rabari has wondered why no investor has so far agreed to put in money in an area situated in Ahmedabad district along the Gulf of Khambhat.

Congress' anti-democratic laws led to Modi govt's 'Constitutional' changes: Scholars

Counterview Desk
A large number of academics* said to be belonging to several Indian and international institutions, even as taking strong exception to the Narendra Modi government's alleged move to amend the Constitution through "illegitimate" means, have taken strong exception to their colleagues in academia who we have become "all too accustomed to adopting a calculated silence in the face of such indignities."

Kashmir normal? Schoolboys, teenagers being arbitrarily picked up, detained: Report

Counterview Desk
A four-person team, consisting of Jean Dr├Ęze, well-known development economist; Kavita Krishnan, who is with the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist); Maimoona Mollah of the All India Democratic Women's Association (AIDWA); and Vimal Bhai of the National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), back from a five-day fact-finding mission (August 9-13) from Kashmir, has said that people they spoke to “expressed their pain, anger, and sense of betrayal against the Government of India.”
In a report, “Kashmir Caged”, released along with a short eight-minute film, they said, the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A, dissolution of the state of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), and bifurcating it into two Union Territories, is not being supported by anyone they met, except for BJP spokesperson on Kashmir affairs Ashwani Kumar Chrungoo, who claimed 46% vote share in J&K.
Excerpts from the report: When our flight landed, and the airlines staff announced that passeng…

Modi's Gujarati mind? Why govt move to 'sell-off' defence PSUs isn't in national interest

By Sandeep Pandey*
The Standing Committee on Defence, 2017-18, of the 16th Lok Sabha highlights the idea of Buy Indian-IDDM (Indigenously Designed Developed and Manufactured). The Committee expressed concern over the import content of equipments produced and developed by Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), Ordnance Factories (OFs) and defence Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) because of the dependence it creates for military hardware on foreign suppliers.

Central Gujarat effluent channel 'releasing' highly polluted industrial wastewater: PM told

Counterview Desk
Senior environmentalists of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti (PSS), Vadodara, Rohit Prajapati and Krishnakant, in an open letter to the Prime Minister, the Gujarat chief minister, the Gujarat chief secretary, and senior Government of India and Gujarat government officials dealing with environment, pollution and climate change have said that the authorities’ response their pleas to take action against the leakages and flow of polluted wastewater from the effluent channels of Central Gujarat industrial areas has met with complete inertia.

Can't go to court with RTI information, rule Ahmedabad authorities: Kankaria accident

By Pankti Jog*
In a shocking reply to an application filed by me, the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) authorities have said that the information provided under the Right to Information (RT) Act should be used in court or in a judicial process. The Act is known to be a major tool that enables citizens to seek certified copies of documents, records from any public authority of state and Central government within 30 days, as per provisions of the Act.

Quit India Movement 'betrayal' and dubious role of Hindu Mahasabha, RSS leaders

By Shamsul Islam*
After the recent guillotine of Article 370, Hindutva ideologue Ram Madhav, while celebrating the occasion stated that it was honouring of the sacrifices of Dr Shyam Prasad Mukherjee and thousands others who laid down their lives for its removal. It is to be noted that Dr Mukherjee was a cadre of RSS and was groomed into a Hindutva leader by another Hindutva icon, VD Savarkar.

Strategy for united struggle against Hindutva 'fascism': Ideological silence is 'no option'

By Dr Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
Electoral alliance and opportunism of national and regional political parties, neoliberal economic marginalisation and soft secular Hindutva line pandering to Hindu majoritarianism laid the foundation of Hindutva fascism in post-colonial India.