Skip to main content

Subverting Gandhi's non-violence, Modi govt "beating" all records of atrocities on minorities

By Syed Mujtaba*
Gandhi’s vision of ideal society was that of a non-violent and democratic social order, in which there would be a just balance between individual freedom and social responsibility. He had a very high regard for ideals in human life. Without ideals, he said, life could have no meaning because there would be no goals towards which human endeavour could be directed.
In Gandhi’s ideal society, satyagraha is particularly stressed as a means (which he describes as “love force” or “soul force”). This force, he wrote, is indestructible; the force of arms is powerless when matched against the force of love or the soul. He, however, admitted that there was no historical evidence of any nation having risen through the use of this force.
It is in this sense that Gandhi put so much emphasis on gradual, peaceful, non-violent change. He believed that a new social order could not be forced, if change was brought through force, it would be a remedy worse than the disease. Gandhi did not wish to slacken the pace of change, but it had to be an organic growth, not a violent superimposition. The organic growth itself was to result in a thoroughgoing, radical social reordering.
The present Government in India has not only undermined whatever Gandhi stood for regarding secular and tolerant India, but has surpassed all the records of state-sponsored atrocities on religious as well as social minorities.
In Kashmir, every alternate day, there are incidents of gashing of eyes, use of ever-new methods of persecution during unending curfews, torching of villages along with crops, and destruction of their business as well as economic life in utter defiance of international human rights laws.
The present government is attempting to change the demography of Kashmir. It is pertinent to mention that on June 14, 2018, UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein released first ever report on the “human rights situation” in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) from July 2016 to April 2018 based on “allegations of widespread and serious human rights violations were received, notably excessive use of force by Indian security forces that led to numerous civilian casualties”.
Released by the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights (OHCHR), Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein’s report calls upon “Indian security forces to exercise maximum restraint, and strictly abide by international standards governing the use of force when dealing with future protests.” He also advises that “it is essential the Indian authorities take immediate and effective steps to avoid a repetition of the numerous examples of excessive use of force by security forces in Kashmir”. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres backed the human rights commissioner.
Although the Constitution of India protects freedom of religion and prohibits discrimination based on one’s faith, instances of violence against religious minorities have been increasing in recent years.
Religious minority groups in India are being consistently subjected to inhuman and intolerant treatment at the hands of growing violent and extremists. Violence and denial of constitutional rights are the usual tools with which Indian minorities are preyed by extremists.
Recently, at an event titled ‘Religious Freedom in India’, religious freedom activists from across the US criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his failure to stop violence carried out by Hindutva groups against religious minorities, including Muslims and Christians.
At a briefing, organised by the Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC) on the Capitol Hill in Washington DC, activists urged the Indian prime minister to condemn violence against religious minorities, asking him to take all necessary measures to curb the rise of Hindutva extremism and punish those involved in violence.
Hamid Ansari, former Vice President of India, who had served the chair for 10 years, said, “The Muslims in the country are experiencing a feeling of unease. A sense of insecurity is creeping in as a result of the dominant mood created by some and the resultant intolerance and vigilantism.”
In Uttar Pradesh , ever since Yogi Adityanath became chief minister, a new wave of intolerance and vigilantism has begun with increasing activities of extremist outfits. Threats are manifesting in different shapes. Schools and other educational institutions, including curriculum, are being systematically changed. If earlier ban on beef took centrestage, now it is change in “Muslim-sounding” names.
Syed Mujtaba
Muslims are facing lynchings, Christians are subjected to vandalism of Churches, the Sikh community is being denied separate socio-religious status, whereas, Scheduled Castes and other communities face different intimidation tactics at cruel and barbaric hands.
Threats of communal violence increase when local forces wait for orders before acting, or worse, are instructed not to act. These problems are compounded when responsible officials are not held accountable after the act. No democracy can be a real democracy where the constitutional secular fabric of society and pluralistic tradition face such serious challenges.
---
*Human right defender, observer of socio-political contexts. Contact: jaan.aalam@gmail.com

Comments

TRENDING

Missed call drive for VVPAT verification follows online plea to "pressure" poll panel

By Our Representative
Several political activists have begun a new campaign, asking concerned citizens to give a missed call on 9667655855 to “support the demand that 2019 Loksabha elections must be declared only after verification of 50% electronic voting machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) receipts.” The effort, supported by civil society networks across India, is meant to "further pressure" India's election machinery to ensure that the poll outcome becomes more transparent.

Did Modi own, buy digital camera costing Rs 7 lakh in 1987-88, also used email?

Counterview Desk
In an interview to the news channel News Nation, aired on Saturday last, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declaring that he had approved the air strike despite bad weather because he felt the clouds would hide Indian planes from Pakistani radar is known to have become a laughing stock across India.

When a neo-nationalist "invaded" hijab clad ladies, Bengali looking scholar in Delhi metro

By Aditi Kundu*
Travelling in Delhi metro on a daily basis to commute from Mayur Vihar to Dwarka, I see diverse people everyday. One can hear them talk about different aspects of life, from kitchen pilitics to national politics. On the morning of May 13, I witnessed a strange incident; disturbing and amusing at the same time.

Terror attacks: Difference in public reactions in India, those in Colombo, Christchurch

By Battini Rao*
Recently, on April 20 during Easter Sunday, more than 250 people were killed in a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in churches and hotels in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Local Islamic organisations Thawheed Jamath (NJT) and Jamathei Milathu Ibrahim (JMI) are held responsible for the attack. Islamic State has also claimed responsibility.

Women lost 88 lakh jobs in 2018: Why Modi "failed" to address their disempowerment?

Counterview Desk
Five human rights leaders Anjali Bhardwaj, Shabnam Hashmi, Purnima Gupta, Dipta Bhog, and Amrita Johri of the Women March for Change have posed 56 questions (alluding to Modi’s claim of 56 inches chest) to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP against the backdrop of his interview with a Bollywood star, which was allegedly masqueraded as a “non-political” conversation.

PepsiCo warned: Withdraw cases against Gujarat farmers or face dire consequences

By Our Representative
About 200 farmers’ leaders and activists, in a letter to Dr KV Prabhu, chairperson, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority (PPVFRA), and Dr R C Agrawal, registrar general, PPVFRA, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India, have demanded that PepsiCo immediately withdraw all the legal suits it has slapped on many potato farmers in different districts of Gujarat.

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

During Emergency, the ruler was extolled but Opposition wasn't punched around: Scribe

By Rajiv Shah
A just-released book, “India: The Wrong Transition”, by a top Delhi-based scribe Anand K Sahay, has quoted “journalistic circles” to say that the Indian mainstream media – with certain “honourable exceptions” – has virtually abandoned the “practice of journalism”, and  this happened following a “sting operation” that showed that “the crème de la crème of Indian journalism were only too willing, for a suitable price, to let poisonous Hindutva propaganda prevail in their news columns.”

Ex-IAS, IPS, IFS officers tell Modi: Pragya Thakur doesn't represent India's rich heritage

Counterview Desk
In an open statement, a group of former civil servants have said that normally they would have dismissed the candidature of Pragya Thakur, who is BJP’s choice for the Bhopal Lok Sabha constituency, as an act of political expediency. However, they were forced to react to her candidature after none other than Prime Minister Narendra Modi termed has as a “symbol of our civilisational heritage.”

Disproportionately high death sentences against Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims: UN told

Counterview Desk
In their joint submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee to meet for the listing of adoption of list of issues at its 126th session, July 1-26, 2019, top Dalit rights organizations have taken strong exception to, among other things, "disproportional application of death sentencing by the judiciary of minorities, such as Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis".