Skip to main content

GoI, state govts "stifling" RTI Act: Apex court wants vacant posts filled up transparently

By Our Representative
Taking serious note of “lack” of transparency, the Supreme Court bench consisting of Justices AK Sikri, S Abdul Nazeer and R Subhash Reddy, has directed the Government of India (GoI) to immediately ensure that information related to the selection of information commissioners, including the chief information commissioner, pending for quite some time, is uploaded on its website.
Insisting that the number and names of applicants, composition of search committee, criteria for short-listing and details of the selection committee, should also be uploaded on it's website, the bench further directed the GoI that all the vacancies in the Central Information Commission (CIC) should be advertised. So far, the GoI has advertised for only five of the eight vacancies in the CIC.
The bench said, the advertisement must clearly define the salary and tenure as per the RTI Act. The ruling came on December 13, 2018, when the public interest litigation (PIL) regarding vacancies in information commissions set up under the Right to Information (RTI) Act was heard by the Supreme Court.
Failure to appoint eight information commissions in the CIC, including that of the chief, is said to have resulted in about 26,500 pending appeals/complaints.
Pinky Anand, additional solicitor general (ASG), informed the court that, as on December 11, 2018, the selection committee had met and the selection of the chief information commissioner was to finalised. The selection of four other vacancies, which were also advertised, was not finalised and was deferred, he added.
The ASG also stated that, for the post of the chief, 64 applications were received; and for the posts of four information commissioners which were advertised, 280 applications were received.
The petitioners pointed out that the government had completely subverted the process of appointment. It had issued a defective advertisement which did not specify the salary and tenure of commissioners. This would have dissuaded people of eminence from applying.
Further it was pointed out that the government was concealing and subverting transparency in the process of appointment by denying even the most basic information. In fact, in its rejoinder, the government had claimed that transparency about the process of appointment was not conducive.
As for the status of state information commissions, the Supreme Court directed each of the respondents to file a reply indicating the number of cases pending, for how long the matters were pending, the number of commissioners currently in the commission and the justification for not appointing additional commissioners if posts were vacant.
The counsel of the government of West Bengal claimed that the number of appeals and complaints being filed to the state information commission was declining and therefore the government did not intend to fill all the vacant posts. Currently there are only two commissioners, including the chief and the government has advertised only one post.
The petitioners pointed out that the commission was disposing appeals/complaints filed more than 10 years ago and the number of appeals/complaints may be declining because the government was frustrating peoples' right to information. The bench inquired if the number of appeals/complaints was declining in West Bengal if people were scared to file RTI applications.
The court took serious note of the continuing subversion of the RTI Act in Andhra Pradesh where the State Information Commission has been non-functional for 20 months. It was pointed out that even though three commissioners were appointed after PIL was filed, no chief had been appointed.
For appointments to the Maharashtra State Information Commission, the court enquired whether appointments were made subsequent to an advertisement. It directed the government to file a reply.
The petition was filed by Anjali Bhardwaj, Lokesh Batra and Amrita Johri. The petitioners were represented by senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, Pranav Sachdeva and Rahul Gupta.
The petition highlights that the “GoI and state governments have attempted to stifle the functioning of the RTI Act by failing to do their statutory duty of ensuring appointment of commissioners in the Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions, in a timely manner”.
Further, it underlines the need for transparency in the appointment of commissioners. “...lack of transparency in the appointment of information commissioners, and the violation of directions of the Supreme Court regarding the procedure for appointment of information commissioners, is undermining the institution of the information commission”.

Comments

TRENDING

New Odia CM's tribal heritage 'sets him apart' from Hindutva Brahminical norms

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  Mohan Charan Majhi took the oath as the new Chief Minister of Odisha following the electoral defeat of the BJD led by Naveen Patnaik, who served as Chief Minister for twenty-four years. The new Chief Minister is the son of a security guard and a four-time MLA who hails from the remote village of Raikala in the Keonjhar district. He belongs to the Santali tribe and comes from a working-class family. Such achievements and political mobilities are possible only in a democratic society. Majhi’s leadership even in the form of symbolic representation in a democracy deserves celebration.

Pellet gun fire severely injures Dalit worker off Bangladesh border

By Kirity Roy*  This is regarding an incident of firing pellets by the Border Security Force (BSF) personnel attached with Panchadoji Border Outpost of ‘E’ Company of 90 BSF Battalion on a Schedule Caste youth of village Parmananda under Dinhata Police Station of Cooch Behar district of West Bengal. The victim was severely injured and one portion of his face became disfigured due to pellet firing by the BSF.

Sanction to persecute Arundhati Roy under UAPA politically motivated: PUCL

Counterview Network  Top human rights group, People’s Union for Civil Liberties, has demanded that the authorities should immediately withdraw the prosecution against top author Arundhati Roy and Dr Sheikh Showkat Hussain, a Kashmir academic, under the " unconstitutional"  Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act  (UAPA), calling the Delhi  Lieutenant-Governor nod for the Delhi police move "politically motivated".

What stops Kavach? Why no time to focus on common trains meant for common people?

By Atanu Roy  A goods train rammed into Kanchenjunga Express on 17th June morning in North Bengal. This could have been averted if the time tested anti-collision system (Kavach) was in place. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Lip-service on World Environment Day vs 'watered-down' eco-safeguards

By Shankar Sharma*  Just a few days ago, the world remembered the routinely forgotten global environment on the occasion of World Environment Day, briefly though, maybe just for the day. There were reports of a few high profile ceremonies in different parts of the country, including a few in New Delhi. Prime Minister Narendra Modi reportedly asked the people of our country to plant one tree per each person as a mark of respect/ gratitude for our mothers.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.