Skip to main content

GoI, state govts "stifling" RTI Act: Apex court wants vacant posts filled up transparently

By Our Representative
Taking serious note of “lack” of transparency, the Supreme Court bench consisting of Justices AK Sikri, S Abdul Nazeer and R Subhash Reddy, has directed the Government of India (GoI) to immediately ensure that information related to the selection of information commissioners, including the chief information commissioner, pending for quite some time, is uploaded on its website.
Insisting that the number and names of applicants, composition of search committee, criteria for short-listing and details of the selection committee, should also be uploaded on it's website, the bench further directed the GoI that all the vacancies in the Central Information Commission (CIC) should be advertised. So far, the GoI has advertised for only five of the eight vacancies in the CIC.
The bench said, the advertisement must clearly define the salary and tenure as per the RTI Act. The ruling came on December 13, 2018, when the public interest litigation (PIL) regarding vacancies in information commissions set up under the Right to Information (RTI) Act was heard by the Supreme Court.
Failure to appoint eight information commissions in the CIC, including that of the chief, is said to have resulted in about 26,500 pending appeals/complaints.
Pinky Anand, additional solicitor general (ASG), informed the court that, as on December 11, 2018, the selection committee had met and the selection of the chief information commissioner was to finalised. The selection of four other vacancies, which were also advertised, was not finalised and was deferred, he added.
The ASG also stated that, for the post of the chief, 64 applications were received; and for the posts of four information commissioners which were advertised, 280 applications were received.
The petitioners pointed out that the government had completely subverted the process of appointment. It had issued a defective advertisement which did not specify the salary and tenure of commissioners. This would have dissuaded people of eminence from applying.
Further it was pointed out that the government was concealing and subverting transparency in the process of appointment by denying even the most basic information. In fact, in its rejoinder, the government had claimed that transparency about the process of appointment was not conducive.
As for the status of state information commissions, the Supreme Court directed each of the respondents to file a reply indicating the number of cases pending, for how long the matters were pending, the number of commissioners currently in the commission and the justification for not appointing additional commissioners if posts were vacant.
The counsel of the government of West Bengal claimed that the number of appeals and complaints being filed to the state information commission was declining and therefore the government did not intend to fill all the vacant posts. Currently there are only two commissioners, including the chief and the government has advertised only one post.
The petitioners pointed out that the commission was disposing appeals/complaints filed more than 10 years ago and the number of appeals/complaints may be declining because the government was frustrating peoples' right to information. The bench inquired if the number of appeals/complaints was declining in West Bengal if people were scared to file RTI applications.
The court took serious note of the continuing subversion of the RTI Act in Andhra Pradesh where the State Information Commission has been non-functional for 20 months. It was pointed out that even though three commissioners were appointed after PIL was filed, no chief had been appointed.
For appointments to the Maharashtra State Information Commission, the court enquired whether appointments were made subsequent to an advertisement. It directed the government to file a reply.
The petition was filed by Anjali Bhardwaj, Lokesh Batra and Amrita Johri. The petitioners were represented by senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, Pranav Sachdeva and Rahul Gupta.
The petition highlights that the “GoI and state governments have attempted to stifle the functioning of the RTI Act by failing to do their statutory duty of ensuring appointment of commissioners in the Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions, in a timely manner”.
Further, it underlines the need for transparency in the appointment of commissioners. “...lack of transparency in the appointment of information commissioners, and the violation of directions of the Supreme Court regarding the procedure for appointment of information commissioners, is undermining the institution of the information commission”.

Comments

TRENDING

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Church in India 'seems to have lost' moral compass of unequivocal support to the poor

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*
In 2017, Pope Francis dedicated a special day, to be observed by the Universal Church, every year, as the ‘World Day of the Poor’. This year it will be observed on November 17 on the theme ‘The hope of the poor shall not perish for ever’; in a message for the day Pope Francis says:

There may have been Buddhist stupa at Babri site during Gupta period: Archeologist

By Rajiv Shah
A top-notch archeologist, Prof Supriya Varma, who served as an observer during the excavation of the Babri Masjid site in early 2000s along with another archeologist, Jaya Menon, has controversially stated that not only was there "no temple under the Babri Masjid”, if one goes “beyond” the 12th century to 4th to 6th century, i.e. the Gupta period, “there seems to be a Buddhist stupa.”

VHP doesn't represent all Hindus, Sunni Waqf Board all Muslims: NAPM on SC ruling

Counterview Desk
India's top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), even as describing the Supreme Court's Ayodhya judgement unjust, has said, it is an "assault on the secular fabric of the Constitution". In a statement signed by top social workers and activists, NAPM said, "The judgement conveys an impression to Muslims that, despite being equal citizens of the country, their rights are not equal before the law."

'First time' since 1970s poverty up 10%, consumer spending down 4%: GoI survey

By Our Representative
In what may prove to be a major embarrassment for the Government of India (GoI), a new official survey, carried out in 207-18, has reportedly said that average consumer spending in India fell by more than 4% the previous six years "primarily driven by slackening rural demand." The survey, "Key Indicators: Household Consumer Expenditure in India”, carried out by the National Statistical Office (NSO), says that money spent per person in a month fell by 3.7% from Rs 1,501 in 2011-12 to Rs 1,446 in 2017-18.

As fear 'grips' right liberals, Arvind Panagariya, too, would be declared anti-national?

By Rajiv Shah
It is surely well-known by now that India's top people in the power-that-be have been castigating all those who disagree with them as "anti-nationals". Nothing unusual. If till yesterday only "secular liberals", and "left-liberals" were declared anti-national, facts, however, appear to have begun surfacing that, now, guns are being trained against those who could be qualified as right liberals, too. Let me be specific.

National award winning film 'Hellaro' co-produced by three chartered accountants

By Our Representative
“Hellaro”, a Gujarati feature film produced by Saarthi Productions in association with Harfanmaula Films (Ahmedabad) was declared as the Best Feature Film at the National Film Awards which was conferred by the Government of India. The film also won the Special Jury Award for the Best Actress to all the 13 actresses of the film.
Ashish Patel produced the movie, which has been co-produced three co-producers, Aayush Patel, Prateek Gupta and Mit Jani, all of whom, interestingly, started their filmmaking journey after becoming Chartered Accountants in 2012.
“Hellaro” is directed by Abhishek Shah, who has been working in Gujarati theatre since the past 17 years as writer, director and actor and has received numerous awards for his plays. He has also worked as a casting director for 12 films.
“Hellaro” is a period drama based in Kutch and has been co-written by Abhishek Shah and Prateek Gupta. Gupta previously received the Best Debut Director Award, along with Mit Jan…