GoI, state govts "stifling" RTI Act: Apex court wants vacant posts filled up transparently

By A Representative
Taking serious note of “lack” of transparency, the Supreme Court bench consisting of Justices AK Sikri, S Abdul Nazeer and R Subhash Reddy, has directed the Government of India (GoI) to immediately ensure that information related to the selection of information commissioners, including the chief information commissioner, pending for quite some time, is uploaded on its website.
Insisting that the number and names of applicants, composition of search committee, criteria for short-listing and details of the selection committee, should also be uploaded on it's website, the bench further directed the GoI that all the vacancies in the Central Information Commission (CIC) should be advertised. So far, the GoI has advertised for only five of the eight vacancies in the CIC.
The bench said, the advertisement must clearly define the salary and tenure as per the RTI Act. The ruling came on December 13, 2018, when the public interest litigation (PIL) regarding vacancies in information commissions set up under the Right to Information (RTI) Act was heard by the Supreme Court.
Failure to appoint eight information commissions in the CIC, including that of the chief, is said to have resulted in about 26,500 pending appeals/complaints.
Pinky Anand, additional solicitor general (ASG), informed the court that, as on December 11, 2018, the selection committee had met and the selection of the chief information commissioner was to finalised. The selection of four other vacancies, which were also advertised, was not finalised and was deferred, he added.
The ASG also stated that, for the post of the chief, 64 applications were received; and for the posts of four information commissioners which were advertised, 280 applications were received.
The petitioners pointed out that the government had completely subverted the process of appointment. It had issued a defective advertisement which did not specify the salary and tenure of commissioners. This would have dissuaded people of eminence from applying.
Further it was pointed out that the government was concealing and subverting transparency in the process of appointment by denying even the most basic information. In fact, in its rejoinder, the government had claimed that transparency about the process of appointment was not conducive.
As for the status of state information commissions, the Supreme Court directed each of the respondents to file a reply indicating the number of cases pending, for how long the matters were pending, the number of commissioners currently in the commission and the justification for not appointing additional commissioners if posts were vacant.
The counsel of the government of West Bengal claimed that the number of appeals and complaints being filed to the state information commission was declining and therefore the government did not intend to fill all the vacant posts. Currently there are only two commissioners, including the chief and the government has advertised only one post.
The petitioners pointed out that the commission was disposing appeals/complaints filed more than 10 years ago and the number of appeals/complaints may be declining because the government was frustrating peoples' right to information. The bench inquired if the number of appeals/complaints was declining in West Bengal if people were scared to file RTI applications.
The court took serious note of the continuing subversion of the RTI Act in Andhra Pradesh where the State Information Commission has been non-functional for 20 months. It was pointed out that even though three commissioners were appointed after PIL was filed, no chief had been appointed.
For appointments to the Maharashtra State Information Commission, the court enquired whether appointments were made subsequent to an advertisement. It directed the government to file a reply.
The petition was filed by Anjali Bhardwaj, Lokesh Batra and Amrita Johri. The petitioners were represented by senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, Pranav Sachdeva and Rahul Gupta.
The petition highlights that the “GoI and state governments have attempted to stifle the functioning of the RTI Act by failing to do their statutory duty of ensuring appointment of commissioners in the Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions, in a timely manner”.
Further, it underlines the need for transparency in the appointment of commissioners. “...lack of transparency in the appointment of information commissioners, and the violation of directions of the Supreme Court regarding the procedure for appointment of information commissioners, is undermining the institution of the information commission”.

Comments

Covishield controversy: How India ignored a warning voice during the pandemic

Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD * It is a matter of pride for us that a person of Indian origin, presently Director of National Institute of Health, USA, is poised to take over one of the most powerful roles in public health. Professor Jay Bhattacharya, an Indian origin physician and a health economist, from Stanford University, USA, will be assuming the appointment of acting head of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA. Bhattacharya would be leading two apex institutions in the field of public health which not only shape American health policies but act as bellwether globally.

Growth without justice: The politics of wealth and the economics of hunger

By Vikas Meshram* In modern history, few periods have displayed such a grotesque and contradictory picture of wealth as the present. On one side, a handful of individuals accumulate in a single year more wealth than the annual income of entire nations. On the other, nearly every fourth person in the world goes to bed hungry or half-fed.

'Serious violation of international law': US pressure on Mexico to stop oil shipments to Cuba

By Vijay Prashad In January 2026, US President Donald Trump declared Cuba to be an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US security—a designation that allows the United States government to use sweeping economic restrictions traditionally reserved for national security adversaries. The US blockade against Cuba began in the 1960s, right after the Cuban Revolution of 1959 but has tightened over the years. Without any mandate from the United Nations Security Council—which permits sanctions under strict conditions—the United States has operated an illegal, unilateral blockade that tries to force countries from around the world to stop doing basic commerce with Cuba. The new restrictions focus on oil. The United States government has threatened tariffs and sanctions on any country that sells or transports oil to Cuba.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

When a lake becomes real estate: The mismanagement of Hyderabad’s waterbodies

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava* Misunderstood, misinterpreted and misguided governance and management of urban lakes in India —illustrated here through Hyderabad —demands urgent attention from Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), the political establishment, the judiciary, the builder–developer lobby, and most importantly, the citizens of Hyderabad. Fundamental misconceptions about urban lakes have shaped policies and practices that systematically misuse, abuse and ultimately erase them—often in the name of urban development.

When grief becomes grace: Kerala's quiet revolution in organ donation

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* Kerala is an important model for understanding India's diversity precisely because the religious and cultural plurality it has witnessed over centuries brought together traditions and good practices from across the world. Kerala had India's first communist government, was the first state where a duly elected government was dismissed, and remains the first state to achieve near-total literacy. It is also a land where Christianity and Islam took root before they spread to Europe and other parts of the world. Kerala has deep historic rationalist and secular traditions.

The Galgotia model: How India is losing the war on knowledge

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* Galgotia is the face of 'quality education' as envisioned by those who never considered education a tool for social change or national uplift — and yet this is precisely the model Narendra Modi pursued in Gujarat as Chief Minister. In the mid-eighties, when many of us were growing up, 'Nirma' became one of the most popular advertisements on Doordarshan. Whether the product was any good hardly seemed to matter.

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria* As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan* “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Search This Blog