Skip to main content

Gujarat advocates' "rare upsurge" against controversial transfer of a top judge

Justice Akil Kureshi
By RK Misra*
In a rare show of solidarity over the transfer of Justice Akil Kureshi to Bombay High Court, the Bar in the Western India state of Gujarat went on strike and relented only after a meeting with Chief Justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi. Rarely has the transfer of a High Court judge created the sort of upsurge in the legal fraternity in Gujarat as was witnessed when Justice Akil Kureshi was moved to Bombay. The Bar struck work, and in one voice urged the apex court to reconsider it’s decision.
On October 29, the Supreme Court Collegium had recommended transfer of Justice Kureshi, the second most senior judge of the Gujarat High Court to the Bombay High Court. It also cleared the elevation of Gujarat High Court chief justice R Subhash Reddy as a Supreme Court judge. 
Ideally, after justice Reddy’s promotion, Justice Kureshi should have been made acting chief justice. But on November 1, the Centre issued a notification appointing Justice A Dave to this post and asked Justice Kureshi to take charge in Mumbai on or before November 15.
On November 2, the government issued a fresh notification, ’in supersession’ of the earlier one, and appointed justice Kureshi to perform the duties of the chief justice of the Gujarat High Court till this transfer. So, in effect, Justice Kureshi was acting chief justice only for a very short time.
This reportedly came about after the chief justice of India (CJI) took up the matter with the government. On November 3, in an interaction with the media in the Supreme Court press lounge, Chief Justice Gogoi admitted the ‘mistake’ and said that it has been ‘corrected’. "Mistakes do happen”, he said.
No sooner was it known that Justice Kureshi has been transferred to Mumbai, speculation was rife in legal circles that the move to transfer him was done by the government to prevent him from taking over as the acting chief justice of the Gujarat High Court.
The Gujarat High Court Advocates Association (GHAA) called an urgent meeting immediately after the news of his transfer on November 1, and passed a unanimous decision stating that it finds no reason to justify his transfer from senior-most puisne judge of the Gujarat High Court to number five in the Bombay High Court 'ostensibly in the interest of better administration of justice’.
The resolution said that the "Bar believes that such a transfer is unjustified and certainly has no connection with better administration of justice. On the contrary it impinges on the independence of the judiciary. It also resolved to deprecate and condemn the transfer.” The transfer is totally unwarranted, uncalled for and unjust . Not only did it decide to strike work indefinitely but the association also decided to challenge the transfer through a writ petition.
Said Yatin Oza, president of GHAA, “The urgent meeting saw a record attendance and feelings of injustice to a judge of immaculate professional credentials ran strong in the gathered members”.
Twenty senior advocates of the Gujarat High Court in a letter also made an impassioned plea to the five member Supreme Court collegium to reconsider the transfer decision. 
The advocates included, among others, Krishnakant Vakharia, Bhalchandra Shah, Vasuben P Shah, Shirish Sanjanwala, Mihir Thakore, Yatin Oza, Saurabh Soparkar, Mihir Joshi, Prashant Desai, Rustom Marshall, Manish Bhatt, Yogesh Lakhani, Percy Kavina, Deven Parikh, Rashesh Sanjanwala, Dhaval Dave, Shalin Mehta, Mehul Shah, Anshin Desai and Navin Pahwa. All big legal names in Gujarat.
The letter stated that Justice Kureshi is currently the senior most judge of the Gujarat High Court after Justice MR Shah who has been recommended for elevation to the Supreme Court and Justice KS Jhaveri who is currently the chief justice of the Orissa High Court. 
"He is one of the finest judges of the High court who is well respected for his intellect as well as for his dignified conduct both on and off the Bench. Even a brief look at his judgements would make it apparent that he decides without fear or favour as indeed every judge must."
The letter points out that there were whispers going around for quite some time that Justice Kureshi would be sidelined because many of his judgements did not find favour with the present dispensation.
”The sudden transfer of a senior judge, otherwise in line for appointment as acting chief justice of our court to puisne judge at number five in seniority in another court, sends an absolutely wrong signal, affects morale of independent judges and does great disservice to the institution”, the letter said.
It reiterated that in the past, the country has witnessed attempts by an assertive Executive to subvert and overwhelm the judiciary as it was the only institution which could rein in their misuse of power.
"An individual judge wages a lonely battle at great sacrifice and risk. If at times like these, the institution does not stand behind a judge as his or her pillar of strength and lend support, it would be failing in it’s constitutional duty at a crucial moment in our country’s history”, it stated.
The GHCAA president who along with his office bearers called on Chief Justice Gogoi and had more than an hour’s meeting, refused to divulge the details, but said that their decision to postpone their strike should be indicative enough. "The meeting was constructive”, he added.
Lawyers, across the board, have nothing but praise for Justice Kureshi. "Even as a lawyer, soft spoken Justice Kureshi’ s integrity was above board. He is a rock solid judicial person. It has never mattered to him who a person is, whether you are the junior-most or the senior-most. He is a judge of meticulous credentials, unimpeachable integrity and unassailable grace”, is how veteran legal luminary Krishnakant Vakharia describes him. Another legal veteran, Sudhir Nanavaty too had nothing but praise for him.
Senior advocate and former president of the Supreme Court Bar association Dushyant Dave termed the transfer of justice Kureshi as the last straw on the camel’s back and voiced concern whether the judiciary could recover from this move to assert its strong independence and impartiality, at least in Gujarat.
"One really wishes that the Collegium, especially of the extraordinary caliber as at present, would venture to cross-check the input or materials that concerned authorities may have placed before the collegium from independent sources, especially members of the Bar and former Supreme Court judges who came from Gujarat high court”, he stated.
Oza said that Justice Kureshi was being penalized by the present government for his judicial pronouncements. These pertained to the lokayukta case in which he had ruled against the Narendra Modi- led Gujarat government by upholding the decision of the governor in appointing retired Gujarat High Court judge RA Mehta to the post and for his decision to send Amit Shah, now BJP president, to judicial custody in the Sohrabuddin alleged fake encounter case. 
"The lokayukta order of the Gujarat High Court was subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court”, he points out. Numerous other lawyers echo this line of thought.
On his part, Justice Kureshi remains unperturbed. He has shunned all media efforts to seek out his views and dutifully joined his new charge in Mumbai.
The highly respected judicial officer has a Gandhian legacy. His grandfather, Abdul Kadir Bawazeer, was a close friend and lifelong associate of Mahatma Gandhi and came to India along with him from South Africa. His father, Hamid Kureshi was born in the Sabarmati Ashram and grew up playing in the lap of the Mahatma. 
He was a Gujarat High Court advocate and was the head of the Sabarmati Ashram Preservation and Memorial Trust. He passed away in 2016. In keeping with his last wishes, he was cremated as he did not desire to waste space which would otherwise go in the ritual burial.
With such an illustrious legacy, it is no wonder that Justice Kureshi too has made a mark in his field.
---
*Senior Gujarat-based journalist. Blog: Wordsmiths & Newsplumbers

Comments

Uma said…
Kudos to the legal fraternity and I hope better sense prevails in the powers that be.

TRENDING

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

RSS' 25,000 Shishu Mandirs 'follow' factory school model of Christian missionaries

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
The executive committee of the International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences (IUAES) recently decided to drop the KISS University in Odisha as the co-host of the World Anthropology Congress-2023. The decision is driven by the argument that KISS University is a factory school.

India must recognise: 4,085 km Himalayan borders are with Tibet, not China

By Tenzin Tsundue, Sandeep Pandey*
There has as been a cancerous wound around India’s Himalayan neck ever since India's humiliating defeat during the Chinese invasion of India in 1962. The recent Galwan Valley massacre has only added salt to the wound. It has come to this because, when China invaded the neighbouring country Tibet in 1950, India was in high romance with the newly-established communist regime under Mao Zedong after a bloody revolution.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur*
Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Gujarat literati flutter: State Akademi autonomy curb a Sahitya Parishad poll issue?

By Dankesh Oza*
The 115-year-old Gujarati Sahitya Parishad is in election mode. More than 3,000 life members of the Parishad are set to elect its 52nd president and 40 plus central working committee (CWC) members, which in turn will elect its executive and two vice presidents, six secretaries and a treasurer for the coming three years (from 2021 to 2023).

Time to give Covid burial, not suspend, World Bank's 'flawed' Doing Business ranking

By Maju Varghese*
On August 27, the World Bank came out with a statement suspending the Doing Business Report. The statement said that a number of irregularities have been reported regarding changes to the data in the Doing Business 2018 and Doing Business 2020 reports, published in October 2017 and 2019. The changes in the data were inconsistent with the Doing Business methodology.

Delhi riots: Cops summoning, grilling, intimidating young to give 'false' evidence

Counterview Desk
More than 440 concerned citizens have supported the statement issued by well-known bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander ‘We will not be silenced’ which said that the communal riots in Delhi in February 2020 have not been caused by any conspiracy, as alleged by the Delhi Police, but by “hate speech and provocative statements made by a number of political leaders of the ruling party.”

WHO chief ignores India, cites Pak as one of 7 top examples in fight against Covid-19

By Our Representative
In a move that would cause consternation in India’s top policy makers in the Modi government, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, World Health Organization (WHO) director-general, has singled out Pakistan among seven countries that have set “examples” in investing in a healthier and safer future in order to fight the Covid-19 pandemic.

Agricultural reform? Small farmers will be more vulnerable, corporates to 'fix' price

By Dibyendu Chaudhuri*
Agriculture employs 42% of the total work force whereas it contributes only 16% to the country’s GDP. The average annual growth rate in agriculture has remained static to 2.9% since the last six years. This means that the post-green revolution conventional agriculture has reached its peak. Responsiveness of soil fertility to fertiliser application, an indicator of stagnancy in agriculture, shows declining trend since 1970. The worst sufferer has been the small and marginal farmers who constitute 86% of total farmers.