Skip to main content

Govt of India must stop criminalization of traditional Hijra livelihoods: NAPM

Counterview Desk
India's top civil society network, National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), in a statement signed by senior social activists* led by Medha Patkar, have demanded thst Parliament must "urgently review" two legislations on transgender person's rights and anti-trafficking.
Pointing out that NAPM stands in solidarity with oppressed groups by observing December 28 as the National Day of Rage against "regressive" provisions of both the Bills, it said, the Government of India must "ensure all constitutional safeguards, including right to life, liberty, equality, self-determination, non-discrimination and reservations".

Text of the statement:

A year after their national protest, hundreds of persons from the transgender community are once again stormed the streets of Delhi today. They are resisting the draconian provisions of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2018 that has been recently passed by the Lok Sabha and is pending consideration of the Rajya Sabha.
In the past ten days since the Transgender Bill was passed, the community has vigorously expressed its outrage across the country, in state after state and the media as well as civil society had to take note of and widely report the gross violations and inadequacies in the Bill.
Except for adopting a more reasonable definition of transgender persons, the present ('amended') Bill has retained most of the problematic aspects of the previous regressive versions.
This includes District Screening Committee for approval of gender; lesser punishments for perpetrators of offences on trans persons vis-a-vis cisgender persons; criminalization of traditional Hijra livelihoods; conflating intersex and gender non-conforming persons with transpersons; and constituting National Council (instead of a Commission at Central and State level) without adequate representation of the gender-diverse community, autonomy and powers to enforce its directives.
The Bill now pending before the Rajya Sabha has no provisions for reservations for transpersons in education and employment, secure access to health and medicare and has very weak framework to address the myriad forms of everyday discrimination that the community faces.
NAPM re-affirms its earnest solidarity with the demands and concerns raised by the transgender, gender queer and intersex community that the present version of the Bill completely ignores the progressive provisions of the Tiruchi Siva’s Private Member Bill (passed by Rajya Sabha in 2015 and pending before Lok Sabha), or the Judgement of the Apex Court in NALSA versus Union of India (2014) or even the recommendations of the Parliamentary Standing Committee.
Along with the Trafficking of Persons (Prevention, Protection and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2018 (passed by Lok Sabha a few months ago), this regressive legislation is likely to jeopardize hijra and other transgender, gender non conforming communities and further discrimination, harassment, and institutional violence.
The Trafficking Bill, passed without consulting a broad-based constituency including working class sex workers and their organizations provide harsh punishments of 10 years for begging. Several provisions of the Bill go against fundamental principles of criminal justice and the Indian Constitution. The Bill vests excessive powers in the police and creates several layers of bureaucratic institutions with no accountability.
It is imperative that marginalised communities of sex workers, bonded labourers, contract workers, domestic workers, construction workers, transgender persons, inter-state, intra-state and international migrant workers are adequately consulted and heard before the Bill is considered by the Rajya Sabha.
The Bill uses the questionable approach of 'rescue' and institutionalized 'rehabilitation' of adult persons who are not necessarily 'trafficked' and have a constitutional right to engage in different forms of work.
The slew of recent instances of sexual abuse of women and girls in various state and NGO run ‘protection’ homes should compel the Government to review its policy of institutionalized rehabilitation by engaging widely with various sections of civil society.
It is both unfortunate and unacceptable that the Parliament is reinforcing patriarchal norms through these Bills and infact missing a radical opportunity to correct the historical injustice perpetuated on the trans community, as pointed out by the Apex Court, both in the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) judgement and the much celebrated Navtej Singh Johar judgement while reading down of Sec 377 IPC.
We call upon the Rajya Sabha not to pass the Transgender Bill in haste and instead refer it to a Select Committee wherein all the recommendations of the Public Service Commission (PSC), NALSA Judgement and Tiruchi Siva Bill are considered in due earnest.
We also call upon the Rajya Sabha to refer the Anti-Trafficking Bill to a Select Committee of the Rajya Sabha and consult all the stake holders who stand to be adversely affected by the contentious provisions of the Bill.
We call upon the Government of India to ensure all constitutional rights and safeguards of transpersons, sex workers and other marginalized sections, including right to life, liberty, equality, self-determination, non-discrimination and reservations.
---
*Click HERE for the list of signatories

Comments

TRENDING

Missed call drive for VVPAT verification follows online plea to "pressure" poll panel

By Our Representative
Several political activists have begun a new campaign, asking concerned citizens to give a missed call on 9667655855 to “support the demand that 2019 Loksabha elections must be declared only after verification of 50% electronic voting machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) receipts.” The effort, supported by civil society networks across India, is meant to "further pressure" India's election machinery to ensure that the poll outcome becomes more transparent.

Did Modi own, buy digital camera costing Rs 7 lakh in 1987-88, also used email?

Counterview Desk
In an interview to the news channel News Nation, aired on Saturday last, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declaring that he had approved the air strike despite bad weather because he felt the clouds would hide Indian planes from Pakistani radar is known to have become a laughing stock across India.

When a neo-nationalist "invaded" hijab clad ladies, Bengali looking scholar in Delhi metro

By Aditi Kundu*
Travelling in Delhi metro on a daily basis to commute from Mayur Vihar to Dwarka, I see diverse people everyday. One can hear them talk about different aspects of life, from kitchen pilitics to national politics. On the morning of May 13, I witnessed a strange incident; disturbing and amusing at the same time.

Terror attacks: Difference in public reactions in India, those in Colombo, Christchurch

By Battini Rao*
Recently, on April 20 during Easter Sunday, more than 250 people were killed in a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in churches and hotels in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Local Islamic organisations Thawheed Jamath (NJT) and Jamathei Milathu Ibrahim (JMI) are held responsible for the attack. Islamic State has also claimed responsibility.

Women lost 88 lakh jobs in 2018: Why Modi "failed" to address their disempowerment?

Counterview Desk
Five human rights leaders Anjali Bhardwaj, Shabnam Hashmi, Purnima Gupta, Dipta Bhog, and Amrita Johri of the Women March for Change have posed 56 questions (alluding to Modi’s claim of 56 inches chest) to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP against the backdrop of his interview with a Bollywood star, which was allegedly masqueraded as a “non-political” conversation.

PepsiCo warned: Withdraw cases against Gujarat farmers or face dire consequences

By Our Representative
About 200 farmers’ leaders and activists, in a letter to Dr KV Prabhu, chairperson, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority (PPVFRA), and Dr R C Agrawal, registrar general, PPVFRA, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India, have demanded that PepsiCo immediately withdraw all the legal suits it has slapped on many potato farmers in different districts of Gujarat.

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

During Emergency, the ruler was extolled but Opposition wasn't punched around: Scribe

By Rajiv Shah
A just-released book, “India: The Wrong Transition”, by a top Delhi-based scribe Anand K Sahay, has quoted “journalistic circles” to say that the Indian mainstream media – with certain “honourable exceptions” – has virtually abandoned the “practice of journalism”, and  this happened following a “sting operation” that showed that “the crème de la crème of Indian journalism were only too willing, for a suitable price, to let poisonous Hindutva propaganda prevail in their news columns.”

Ex-IAS, IPS, IFS officers tell Modi: Pragya Thakur doesn't represent India's rich heritage

Counterview Desk
In an open statement, a group of former civil servants have said that normally they would have dismissed the candidature of Pragya Thakur, who is BJP’s choice for the Bhopal Lok Sabha constituency, as an act of political expediency. However, they were forced to react to her candidature after none other than Prime Minister Narendra Modi termed has as a “symbol of our civilisational heritage.”

Disproportionately high death sentences against Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims: UN told

Counterview Desk
In their joint submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee to meet for the listing of adoption of list of issues at its 126th session, July 1-26, 2019, top Dalit rights organizations have taken strong exception to, among other things, "disproportional application of death sentencing by the judiciary of minorities, such as Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis".