Skip to main content

Telangana's deleted voters: "Hidden danger" in signing forms meant for first time voters

By A Representative
In a letter to the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), Election Commission of India (ECI), Delhi, several political activists, including Magsaysay award winner Sandeep Pandey, have objected to the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), Telengana, offering Form 6 for deleted voters, which they say is “meant for new voters that has self-declaration clause under s.132 of Representative of People’s Act (RPA), invoking punishment if already has been in the voter list at least once."
According to them, “We have been asking for segregated list of deleted re-registered vis-a-vis first time new voters”, yet the demand has “not been heeded”, adding, “We have been asking for restoration of unauthorized deleted voters and not for fresh registration as new voter in Form 6. But this was overlooked.”
Signed by Pandey, Lubna Sarwath, who contested the Telengana assembly elections this year, Chakri S, and Guru Moorthy all belonging to the Socialist Party (India), the letter to the CEC says, there is a “hidden danger for the re-registering voter who is calling for state to prosecute oneself due to false declaration which the re-registering voter is dragged into.”
Pointing out that the “heading of form 6 itself is for new voters or for shifting purpose but not for those who had/have a voter ID and find themselves being unauthorizedly deleted”, they say, now they are being “coerced into filling the new voter form that consists a self-declaration inviting the state to prosecute if filling the Form 6 in spite of having been already a registered voter before.”
Seeking a separate form “with a clear heading for deleted voters who have been advised officially by CEO/ECI to re-register themselves”, the letter states, the ECI should “declare official security and indemnity for all the deleted voters who had been thus far been coerced and misled into filling Form 6”. It wonders why is CEO, Telengana, committing illegalities such as unauthorized deletions of voters of citizens of India and then can further mislead, misguide and coerce innocent citizens into an untruthful self-declaration that implicates self into offences punishable both under Representation of people Act 1951 as well as Indian Penal Code.”

Comments

TRENDING

Rani Laxmi Bai, Tatya Tope 'martyred' by East India Company, Scindia's forefathers

Jiyaji Rao Scindia By  A  Representative In an email alert to Counterview, well-known political scientist Shamsul Islam has said that was “shameful for any political party in democratic India to keep children of Sindhias in their flock” given their role during the First War of Indian Independence (1857). In a direct commentary on Madhya Pradesh Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia moving over to BJP, Prof Islam has quote from a British gazetteer to prove his point.

Caste, class, and Patidar agitation: Veteran academic 'unearths' Gujarat’s social history

By Rajiv Shah  Recently, I was talking with a veteran Gujarat-based academic who is the author of several books, including "Social Movements in India: A Review of Literature", "Untouchability in Rural India", "Public Health and Urban Development: The Study of Surat Plague", and "Dalit Identity and Politics", apart from many erudite articles and papers in research and popular journals.

The anti-national tag: Silencing India’s water protests or admitting the truth?

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava   A few days ago, several women from Chandkheda, Ahmedabad, staged a protest at the Municipal Corporation office, raising concerns about the lack of water availability in their neighbourhood. These women were labelled "anti-national." This characterisation follows remarks by Nitin Gadkari , Minister of Road Transport & Highways, who recently described those who speak about India's water crisis as "anti-national." While Gadkari made this statement in reference to his ethanol project, the term has increasingly become governmental language for citizens who raise questions and objections.