Skip to main content

Nasiruddeen Shah "mustn't" stop speaking: Silence in these times would be "criminal"

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
What Naseeruddin Shah said the other day was the reflection of the fear humanists and secularists have in all those societies which are today polarising on religious identities. It is easier to get around that and cry. The cinema in India has remained a vehicle for the Brahmanical hegemony over culture till date, with its leading lights behaving spinelessly before the power-that-be, even as getting benefits from it.
But why does it shock us when he says: "Death of a cow is more important than death of a police officer?" What is wrong in this statement? Hasn't the Uttar Pradesh government showed its callous attitude on the issue? Two young sons of inspector Subodh Kumar Singh -- who was murdered by Hindutva-inspired goons having open allegiance to Bajrang Dal -- have spoken of the threat to their lives and their mother.
More than 50 Muslims and Dalits have been killed in cow-related lynching cases, but there is not a single conviction so far. The trial court hearing to the Sohrabuddin case, meanwhile, has released all the accused, with the judge apologizing to the family that there was not enough evidence to punish the accused.
Our jails are filled with Muslims, Dalits and Adivasi activists, and Hindutva goons have a free day to kill, lynch anything, challenge the Constitution openly, with complete immunity. In such a situation, any right-thinking person would say what Naseeruddin Shah has said.
Things become more for difficult for people like him, because they say things openly, pointing out that their children got secular education, that time and again they have spoken out against evils within the Muslims community. But then Hindutva politics doesn't bother about your political ideology; it only identifies your birth-based identity.
A Muslim, in their scheme of things, has no right to speak about India. Naseeruddin Shah, after speaking on the fear about his children, has become a 'Muslim' for them, and that too may be 'anti-national'. Some are asking him questions about Rohingiyas, others about Islamic countries, as if he is their spokesperson!
The whole thinking of Hindutva and the politicians inspired by it is to defend all the rubbish and continue to flood India with their idiocies so that people don't discuss any other things but fall in their trap.
One has to only see how different voices in their party are now giving different castes to Hindu God Hanuman. The Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister started it by suggesting that Hanuman was a Dalit, followed by a Hindutva Muslim leader suggesting that Hanuman was a Muslim, as he has a 'man' in his name, adding, only Muslims have 'man' in their names -- Salman, Rehman, Suleiman, and so on. Another joker was not to left behind; he came out with a new idea that Hanuman must have been a Jaat. Now these are the political discourses in India which reflect the situation and the level of our discourses. Surely, all this is deliberate.
The Brahmanical media is doing its duty. It must to protect the Brahmanical system. So, it dutifully paints things entirely differently. It would raise the question as to why Naseeruddin Shah spoke like that. "People of India give these Muslims so much of respect and yet they speak like Pakistanis", they suggest, as if Muslims have no right to speak, question or fight for their rights.
That is where Hindutva protagonists have taken every debate in India to, with the active support of the corrupted media houses and their doubly corrupt anchors. They want to debate India in the Hindu-Muslim binary, which suits the power elite among Hindus and Muslims, while all those who speak from a caste angle are sidelined. The 'secularist' media too falls in this trap, because a majority of the bosses in these secular houses are Brahmanical in nature and avoid speaking beyond these binaries.
Now we are hearing lots of issues being raised about Naseeruddin Shah. He can't move out as there are protests. His travel to Ajmer has been cancelled. He is being abused and condemned. This unashamed trolling is the biggest contribution of the Sanghi-inspired online rogues, who want rights of immigrants and minorities in the developed world, but don't want this for others.
Naseeruddin Shah and others must not stop. Everything is political, and they must stand for secular voices for social justice and social change. They should continue, regularly speak on such issues which confront the nation. The trolls want them not to speak, and it is time they mount their attack against such goons, who want every saner voice to get silenced. We must not remain silent, as silence in these times would only be criminal.
---
*Well-known human rights defender. Source: Author's Facebook timeline

Comments

TRENDING

Covishield controversy: How India ignored a warning voice during the pandemic

Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD *  It is a matter of pride for us that a person of Indian origin, presently Director of National Institute of Health, USA, is poised to take over one of the most powerful roles in public health. Professor Jay Bhattacharya, an Indian origin physician and a health economist, from Stanford University, USA, will be assuming the appointment of acting head of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA. Bhattacharya would be leading two apex institutions in the field of public health which not only shape American health policies but act as bellwether globally.

Growth without justice: The politics of wealth and the economics of hunger

By Vikas Meshram*  In modern history, few periods have displayed such a grotesque and contradictory picture of wealth as the present. On one side, a handful of individuals accumulate in a single year more wealth than the annual income of entire nations. On the other, nearly every fourth person in the world goes to bed hungry or half-fed.

'Serious violation of international law': US pressure on Mexico to stop oil shipments to Cuba

By Vijay Prashad   In January 2026, US President Donald Trump declared Cuba to be an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US security—a designation that allows the United States government to use sweeping economic restrictions traditionally reserved for national security adversaries. The US blockade against Cuba began in the 1960s, right after the Cuban Revolution of 1959 but has tightened over the years. Without any mandate from the United Nations Security Council—which permits sanctions under strict conditions—the United States has operated an illegal, unilateral blockade that tries to force countries from around the world to stop doing basic commerce with Cuba. The new restrictions focus on oil. The United States government has threatened tariffs and sanctions on any country that sells or transports oil to Cuba.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan   The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by  Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

When a lake becomes real estate: The mismanagement of Hyderabad’s waterbodies

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*  Misunderstood, misinterpreted and misguided governance and management of urban lakes in India —illustrated here through Hyderabad —demands urgent attention from Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), the political establishment, the judiciary, the builder–developer lobby, and most importantly, the citizens of Hyderabad. Fundamental misconceptions about urban lakes have shaped policies and practices that systematically misuse, abuse and ultimately erase them—often in the name of urban development.

When grief becomes grace: Kerala's quiet revolution in organ donation

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Kerala is an important model for understanding India's diversity precisely because the religious and cultural plurality it has witnessed over centuries brought together traditions and good practices from across the world. Kerala had India's first communist government, was the first state where a duly elected government was dismissed, and remains the first state to achieve near-total literacy. It is also a land where Christianity and Islam took root before they spread to Europe and other parts of the world. Kerala has deep historic rationalist and secular traditions.

The Galgotia model: How India is losing the war on knowledge

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Galgotia is the face of 'quality education' as envisioned by those who never considered education a tool for social change or national uplift — and yet this is precisely the model Narendra Modi pursued in Gujarat as Chief Minister. In the mid-eighties, when many of us were growing up, 'Nirma' became one of the most popular advertisements on Doordarshan. Whether the product was any good hardly seemed to matter. 

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes. 

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.