Skip to main content

Text of India's news broadcasting authority castigating Republic TV for calling rally participant "anti-Indian"

The Republic TV show which "circled" A Singh 
Counterview Desk
The News Broadcasting Standards Authority (NBSA), in its order dated August 30, which is already creating ripples in the media world, has castigated Republic TV's founder-editor Arnab Goswami for using words “vulgar thug”, “pervert”, “goon”, “sexist", "hyena" and "anti-Indian" for A Singh, one of the participants at a rally organized by Gujarat Dalit rights leader Jignesh Mevani at Parliament Street, New Delhi, on January 9 this year. Following a hearing, it has asked Republic TV to apologize to Singh for the use of such words on September 7 at 9 pm.
Text of the NBSA order on the complaint dated January 29, 2018 by A Singh against Republic TV:

Complaint

l. The complaint was that in Mr. Arnab Goswami’s show on 9.1.2018 at 9 PM (repeated many times and video also put up on the website of Republic TV), while reporting about a youth rally under the caption “Jignesh Flop Show” the complainant’s image was shown with red dots around his head, targeting and calling him as “vulgar thug”, ‘pervert’, ‘goon”, “sexist", "hyena" and "anti-Indian". He alleged that the broadcaster refused to apologize in spite of his complaint.

Response from the Broadcaster

2. The response of the broadcaster was that its reporter (Ms. Shivani Gupta) along with channel’s cameraman, were at the venue of a rally on 9.1.2018 and the broadcast complained about was highlighting the unruly and uncivilized behavior of certain unidentified persons, including the complainant who harassed her at that time. The broadcaster stated that it could be clearly seen from the objected news report (video footage) that the complainant (person identified by red dots) was interfering with the reporting done by the channel’s female reporter by moving towards her in an intimidating and aggressive manner and shouting the words “jhooth bol rahi hai ye” as she was confronting another person harassing her. It was further alleged that the complainant engaged in further sloganeering which, though not clearly audible, appeared to be aimed at the female reporter. The actions of the complainant and others present at the venue of the rally presented an imminent threat and danger to reporter, necessitating her to be escorted away with police protection.
3. The broadcaster submitted that the broadcast was based on sufficient facts, cogent and credible evidence and there was nothing in the broadcast to defame, ridicule or harass the complainant. It was submitted that the broadcaster did not violate the Regulations and Guidelines of NBA/NBSA.
4. NBSA at its meeting held on 24.5.2018 had considered the complaint, the response of the broadcaster and also viewed the CD. Not being satisfied with the explanation given by the broadcaster and being prima facie satisfied that the language used against the complainant in the broadcast [such as “vulgar", thug", “pervert”, “goon", sexist” and “anti-Indian”] was inappropriate and unwarranted on the facts and circumstances, NBSA decided to call both parties for a hearing.
5. The following persons were present at the hearing on 11.7.2018:
Complainant:
Mr. A. Singh (Complainant) with his wife Ms. Pratishtha Singh
Mr. Mohit Kumar Daraad, Advocate
ARG Outlier Media Asianet News Pvt. Ltd. [Channel : Republic TV]
Mr. Abhishek Kapoor, Executive Editor
Ms. Shivani Gupta, News Editor & Anchor
Mr. Rajat Pradhan, Advocate

Submission of Complainant

6. In his submissions, the complainant stated that in the video, he was shown as saying, "Koi aapko tang nahi kar raha, aap jhooth bol rahi hain”. He stated that anyone hearing him saying “Aap ihooth bol rahi hain”, would realise that he was not behaving as a “vulgar thug”, “pervert”, “goon”, “sexist” and that by no stretch of imagination, he could be labeled as “anti-Indian” which were the descriptions used by Mr. Arnab Goswami in the broadcast while referring to him.
He pointed out that after posting the video on its website, the channel removed the red dots shown around his face, as by then, he had sent a series of emails to the channel and also complained to several authorities including NBSA. The complainant and his wife stated on seeing the broadcast, many of their relatives called expressing shock and the broadcast has brought shame and loss of reputation to the family. They demanded an apology from the channel.
Arnab Goswami on the show

Submission by Broadcaster

7. The broadcaster submitted that the channel reported news in relation to the Jignesh Mevani rally held at the Parliament Street on 9th January 2018, covered by Ms. Shivani Gupta, one of the female editors of the channel and anchor of Republic TV. While the reporter was reporting the news regarding the rally, about 10 to 12 unidentified men and the complainant surrounded the Reporter and started harassing her by making unwelcome gestures and sexually colored remarks and shouted intimidating slogans against the reporter, with the obvious intent of obstructing her from reporting. Even though the rally was being covered by several journalists of different news channels who were present at the Parliament Street, the unidentified men and the complainant singled out its reporter and subjected her to continued harassment and assault. The reporter being put in a situation wherein she had to fear for her safety and modesty due to the criminal intimidation of unidentified men and the complainant had to be escorted away by the police given the imminent danger to her. The broadcaster submitted the incident had been captured by the cameraman of Republic TV. The broadcaster being deeply concerned with the intimidating treatment meted out to its reporter by unidentified persons and the complainant, filed a complaint with the Parliament Street Police Station on 14 January 2018 through Mr. Abhishek Kapoor, Executive Editor of Republic TV, against unidentified persons (as the identity of complainant was not known at that point in time) in regard to the offences of wrongful restraint [Section 341 of the Indian Penal Code ("113C"), assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty (Section 354 IPC), sexual harassment (Section 354-11 IPC), criminal intimidation (Section 506 113(3)] and for using words, gestures or acts intended to insult the modesty of a woman. According to the broadcaster, the matter is still under investigation.
8. The broadcaster, after reiterating the substance of what was stated in their response, contended that the video footage clearly showed that the complainant had actively participated in the gathering/rally and was amongst those who intimidated/ attempted to intimidate their female reporter. According to the broadcaster, the purpose for which the complainant may have been present at the rally and the fact
whether or not he was associated with Mr. Jignesh Mewani was immaterial as the larger issue was the threats held out and the intimating behavior against its female reporter. The broadcaster submitted that in view of the behaviour of the group of men, including the complainant in harassing its reporter, it (Republic TV) decided to highlight the said issue in the broadcast by holding a debate on the same; and that in order to create public awareness, it had identified the accused persons, including the complainant, in the programme.

Consideration by NBSA

9. NBSA viewed the CD and carefully considered the arguments. The footage does not show use of any objectionable words by the complainant or any gesture which can be described as “lewd” or “threatening”. NBSA was of the view that the use of words like: “I am going to show these crude, lewd hyenas/ show the dirty faces of lewd, cheap, vulgar, sexist, pervert anti-Indian goons" by Mr. Arnab Goswami, who was anchoring the programme, while the channel focused on the face of the complainant (by marking his face by a circle of red dots) from among the persons at the rally venue who allegedly threatened/ harassed its female news reporter, Ms. Shivani Gupta, was totally unwarranted and unjustified and the same was in violation of the Broadcasting Standards.
10. The Code of Ethics and Broadcasting Standards of NBA, relating to “Impartiality and Objectivity in Reporting”, provide “... It is the responsibility of TV news channels to keep accuracy and balance as precedence over speed. If despite this, there are errors, channels should be transparent about them. Channels should also strive not to broadcast anything which is obviously defamatory or libelous..."
11. The specific Guidelines covering Reportage (vide para 4.2) requires that the content of the reporting should avoid crude, offensive or coarse language. The Guidelines on Broadcast of Potentially Defamatory Content provide: “A news anchor/journalist/presenter should not make a derogatory or judgmental statements as part of reporting or commenting” (vide Basic Guideline 5) and “As a norm, a news channel should not report -- live or recorded -- any statement that is per se derogatory or derisive”.
12. NBSA noted that the very same news report by the channel in regard to the very same rally, had also wrongly identified a news reporter of another channel as one of the perpetrators who targeted its News Editor Ms. Shivani Gupta at the Jignesh Mevani Rally. But in his case, on the very next day, the broadcaster had issued the following clarification:
“On the debate yesterday, we inadvertently circled the visual of a reporter from ABP News... while running pictures of our News Editor Shivani Gupta being targeted by individuals present at the Jignesh Mevani Rally. It was a genuine error, an oversight by our video editor, and not intentional...”
13. In view of its findings, NBSA decided that the broadcaster be directed to air a clarification as per the text to be furnished by NBSA on the date and time indicated by MESA.

Decision/Directions of NSBA

(i) The broadcaster shall, prior to the commencement of the 9 pm news on 7.9.2018, air the following text (static) on its channel (Republic TV), on full screen in large font size with a clearly audible voice-over (in slow speed) expressing regret on its channel Republic TV by stating the following:
“On the debate 'Jignesh Flop Show' aired on Republic TV on 9.1.2018 at 9 pm, the channel had inadvertently circled the visual of Mr. A. Singh, while running pictures of its News Editor Ms. Shivanl Gupta being moderated by individuals present at the Jignesh Mevani Rally. It was a genuine error; an oversight by our video editor; and not intentional. Therefore, we wish to convey our regrets for the error, which we reiterate was unintentional.”
(ii) If the broadcaster fails to do so on the date and time stipulated in Direction (i) above, the broadcaster shall air the following text (static) on its channel (Republic TV) prior to the commencement of the 9 PM news on 14.9.2018 on full screen in large font size with a clearly audible voice over (in slow speed) stating the following:
"On the debate 'Jignesh Flop Show' aired on Republic TV on 9.1.2018 at 9 PM, this channel had circled the visual of Mr. A. Singh (while running pictures) of its News Editor Ms. Shivani Gupta) as targeting and intimidating her. On a complaint by A. Singh, News Broadcasting Standards Authority has passed an order dated 30.8.2018 holding that Mr. Arnab Goswaml, who anchored the programme, was not justified in using the words ‘I am going to show these crude, lewd hyenas/show the dirty faces of of lewd, cheap, vulgar, sexist, pervert anti-Indian goons' with reference to the complainant. News Broadcasting Standards Authority further held that this channel had violated the Code of Ethics and Broadcasting Standards of NBA and the Specific Guidelines Covering Reportage and should therefore air an apology to Mr. A. Singh. Accordingly, we hereby apologise to Mr. A. Singh for wrongly referring to him as lewd, cheap, vulgar, sexist, pervert, anti-Indian goon.
(iii) The video of the said broadcast, if hosted on the website of Republic TV or Youtube, or any other links, should be removed immediately and confirmed in NBSA in writing within 7 days.
(iv) The broadcaster shall submit a CD containing the telecast with particulars of the date and time of the telecast, within one week of the telecast, as proof of compliance. After such CD is submitted by the broadcaster, the matter will be closed.
(v) NBA shall (a) send a copy of this Order to the complainant and the broadcaster; (b) circulate this Order to all Members, Editors & Legal Heads of NBA, (c) host this Order on its website and include it in its next Annual Report, and (d) release the Order to the media.
Any finding or observation by NBSA in this order is only in the context of examination as to whether there was any violation of Broadcasting Standards and Guidelines. Neither this order, nor the regret to be telecast by the broadcaster in pursuance of this order, shall be construed as an admission by the broadcaster of any wrong doing giving rise to a civil or criminal liability.
Justice R.V. Raveendran (Retd)
Chairperson

Comments

TRENDING

Economist-editor's allegations on Narmada defamatory, baseless: Medha Patkar

Counterview Desk  In a reply directly addressed to well-known economist, journalist and columnist Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar’s two articles in the Times of India (republished here and here ), calling them defamatory and wondering whether they were borne out of “ignorance or a conspiracy through political alliance”, Narmada Bachao Andolan leader Medha Pakar has said that the Narmada Sardar Saravar Project and the people's movement by adivasis, farmers, labourers, fish workers, potters and all the generations’ old communities from the river valley have suddenly come to be focused on, since the Gujarat elections are in the doorstep. She believes that while the “defamatory accusations with baseless conceptions such as ‘urban naxals’ are to be laughed at as the electoral strategic moves, one gets shocked to read the articles by a known old columnist like Swaminathan Ankalesaria Aiyar, published in a reputed daily like the Times of India." According to her, Aiyar’s two articl

Hindutva groups threat to peace, freedom: US diaspora groups tell FBI, other govt depts

By Our Representative  The Islamophobic and neo-Nazi ideology of Hindutva is a clear and present danger to peace and freedoms in the United States, a coalition of civil rights organizations told key officials of the U.S. Attorney General’s Office, the US Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) at a recent event in Edison, New Jersey. At the event titled United Against Hate, activists from American Muslims for Democracy (AMD), Hindus for Human Rights (HfHR) and Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC) made detailed presentations on this ideology of Hindu supremacism that is committing mass persecution of India’s Muslims and Christians and is rearing its ugly head in New Jersey as well as across the US. Attending the event were David S Leonardis, Special Investigator from the New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety; Michael E Campion, Chief of the Civil Rights Division for the US Attorney General's Office; and Jonathan R Norbut of the U.S. Dep

Facing tough times, Rajasthan's Raika herders hold first-ever camel cheese festival

By Rosamma Thomas*  During the pandemic, the annual Pushkar camel fair in Rajasthan did not occur for fear of contagion; in 2022, it was called off again as lumpy skin disease affected cattle. At Sadri in Pali district, however, festivity continues – a two-day Camel Cheese Festival was held on November 23 and 24, 2022. Visitors spent time with the camel herds and their Raika, drank camel-milk tea with the herders and then returned to lunch at the Kumbhalgarh Camel Dairy, from where the Kumbhalgarh Fort is visible, to taste camel cheese. The Raika herders have been facing a tough time – camels are no longer used as much for transport or agriculture in Rajasthan. The animals have limited utility, but their milk is prized. Camel Charisma, the dairy at Kumbhalgarh, sends camel milk across the country to people who use it in therapy – for autistic children, improved blood sugar levels, or even to treat cancer. It is believed that the health benefits of the camel milk is because the animals

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

As polls approach, electorate 'failing to realise': Gujarat model is in a shambles

By DN Rath*  Gujarat assembly elections, scheduled to be held on 1 and 5 December 2022, is viewed by many as dress rehearsal for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. When the suffering people have been pointing towards redressal of some local issues like absence of cleanliness, sewage problem, shortage of water supply, troubles created by stray cattle, insufficiency of streetlights, etc., it is evident that they are not fully aware that assembly elections are being fought on ideological standpoints and policy decisions. Nor is there the realisation that the state is in a shambles and the much-trumpeted ‘Gujarat model’ of development has proved to be a hoax. Like other states, the people of Gujarat are also back-broken by steep rise in prices to the tune of 400% in last 20 years. It is not that the government cannot control the spurt in prices if it so wants. Apart from the fact that price rise is an inevitability in a capitalist economy, artificial shortage triggered by massive hoarding, b

Shedding Hindu-Hindi-Hindustan? New Modi-Shah love for Tamil Nadu 'ignores' Periyar

By Sandeep Pandey*   The Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) or the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) have long argued for ‘Hindu-Hindi-Hindustan’, which into recent years has translated into a crisper English expression: ‘One Nation-One Religion-One Language’. Given this backdrop, it is curious that the BJP government has organised the Kashi Tamil Sangamam in Varanasi, the Prime Minister’s constituency. Why did the BJP and RSS feel the need for such an event? All Narendra Modi events are highly publicised and have multiple political objectives. It is never an innocuous religious/cultural event as it may appear from the face of it. Afterall, RSS calls itself a cultural organisation, but has never ceased to surprise us with its political designs. Tamil Nadu has a long history of opposing imposition of Hindi by Union governments. Periyar EV Ramasamy had opposed the idea of compulsory teaching in Hindi as far back as in 1937. The 1960s witnessed violent protests against Hindi in which a number

Amit Shah accused of inciting communal passion: Demand to postpone Gujarat polls

Counterview Desk  In an email representation to the Election Commission of India (ECI), Dr EAS Sarma, former secretary to the Government of India, has objected to the statement reported to have been made by Union home minister Amit Shah, who allegedly justified the 2002 Gujarat riots stating that certain sections of people “taught a lesson” to the rioters. Noting that the statement, if correct, “in effect implies those other than the law enforcement authorities had taken law into their hands”, Sarma says, “Shah's statement needs to be viewed by the ECI in conjunction with the reported fact that it was the Union Home Ministry that cleared the release of the eleven rape convicts in the Bilkis Bano case, directly related to the infamous Godhra incidents in 2002, which triggered the shameful sequence of events that shook the nation's conscience.” According to Sarma, if the statement is true, “I am constrained to draw the inevitable inference that it would have already impacted th

BJP poll gimmick? Bilkis Bano rape case 'pardon' vs Rajiv assassins' release

By Sandeep Pandey*  Supreme Court has released six convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. This was bound to happen as earlier AG Perarivalan was released in the same case, setting a precedent. Even though four of them are Sri Lankans but a popular Tamil sentiment favoured the release of these convicts which is why Tamil political parties supported this and resolutions were passed by different governments in Tamil Nadu to his effect.  Rajiv Gandhi paid the price of sending Indian Peace Keeping Force to Sri Lanka where it got entangled with Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam and eventually the whole operation ended up is a fiasco.  However, most importantly Sonia and Priyanka Gandhi and probably Rahul too do not have any objections to the release of these convicts. In fact, Sonia Gandhi played an important role in getting the death sentence of the only lady among the convicts Nalini commuted to life term through the Tamil Nadu Governor. Priyanka visited Nalini in Vellore Jail and

Diminishing returns: Hydro projects contribute less than 10% of India's power generation

Counterview Desk  Pointing out that India’s hydro generation remains around 10% for the last six years, the advocacy group South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People (SANDRP) has said that power generation from hydropower projects continues to show diminishing returns, as has been the story close to three decades now. Yet, says SANDRP in a note, the Government of India continues to push large hydro by announcing a slew of additional subsidies for hydropower projects, more for political economy reason. In fact, attempts are being made to flog unviable hydropower projects with various kind of manipulations, illegalities and violations, it adds. Text : In last six years, from 2016-17 to 2021-22, India’s large hydropower projects (projects above 25 MW installed capacity) have contributed just around 10% of the total power generation, going as low as 9.68% in 2017-18. In fact, in three of these six years, large hydro contributed less than 10% and recovering only marginally in the rest,

Odisha survey reveals 56% children have not attended any classes post-pandemic

By Our Representative   The Learning Recovery Programme (LRP) has been taken up by the state government's Odisha School Education Programme Authority (OSEPA) to provide a learning opportunity to students to make up for losses in studies due to the closure of schools on account of the Covid-19 pandemic. However, lack of awareness among children and their parents and absence of robust monitoring have blocked its effective implementation, reveals a pilot fact-finding study conducted by the NGO Atmashakti Trust. The pilot study was conducted with school-going children in two blocks of the Nuapada district, where over 500 grassroots workers divided into 33 groups visited 68 schools in one day and interviewed 115 children to understand the implementation of LRP. The study was a part of its 26-day nationwide campaign, "Education Cannot Wait. Act Now!" which kickstarted on November 15, comprising Odisha, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh, where