Skip to main content

Circular asking media not to use 'Dalit' will "harm" movement asserting against caste based oppression: Amnesty

Counterview Desk
A Government of India circular asking media not to use 'Dalit' but 'Scheduled Caste' has led to a major controversy across India. Amnesty International, one of the world's most well-known human rights organizations, has joined India's top Dalit activists who have protested against the GoI move. Gujarat's top Dalit leader Jignesh Mevani, for instance, said that the word 'Dalit' is "our political identity and we earned this identity after decades of struggle", giving credit to Dr BR Ambedkar with the credit to popularize the word.

Text of Amnesty's statement:

The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting’s circular to television news channels to refrain from using the term ‘Dalit’ and use the term ‘Scheduled Caste’ instead, will impede the Dalit rights movement from asserting itself against caste-based oppression, Amnesty International India said today.
The circular which was issued to the News Broadcasters Association (a private association of different news television broadcasters in India) on August 7, advised that “media may refrain from using the nomenclature “Dalit” while referring to members belonging to Scheduled Caste in compliance with the directions of the Hon’ble Bombay High court and the Constitutional term ‘Scheduled Caste’ in English, and it’s appropriate translation in other national languages, should alone be used”.
“Progressive social groups adopted the term ‘Dalit’ in the 1970s to assert their identity in their fight against caste-based oppression. The term ‘Dalit’ is much more than just a word, it is a shared identity that recognizes the historic discrimination faced by the community in India. The government has no business telling the media to not use the term ‘Dalit’. Government should respect the right of Dalit groups to identify themselves in the manner they choose,” said Asmita Basu, Programmes Director, Amnesty International India.
Amnesty International India spoke to two private news channels who have confirmed that they have received the circular. It is unclear though whether newspapers and magazines have also received the circular. The Ministry so far has not specified whether the circular was binding and did not list any action if TV news channels do not comply.
Speaking to Amnesty International India, Paul Diwakar, General Secretary of National Campaign for Dalit Human Rights (NCDHR) said “If the media is gagged from upholding the values of fundamental rights, then this would affect the right to dignity and the right to life for those who are fighting against caste-based oppression. This will affect the identity of not only this generation but also for future generations”.
This is not the first time where the Central Government is insisting that the term ‘Dalit’ not be used. The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment on 15 March 2018, in a letter to the Chief Secretaries of state governments and Union Territories said, “…that the Central government/state government and its functionaries would refrain from using the nomenclature ‘Dalit’ for the members belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as the same does not find mentioned in the Constitution of India or any statute.”
In June 2018, the Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court while hearing a public interest litigation seeking the removal of the word ‘Dalit’ from all government documents and communication asked the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to consider issuing a direction to media to stop using the word ‘Dalit’, following the March 2018 circular advising government officials against using the word.
Speaking to Amnesty International India, journalist and writer, Sudipto Mondal said, “The term ‘Dalit’ is a larger term of self-identification. Scheduled Caste is not descriptive. There are various interpretations of the term ‘Dalit’, it is growing in significance and is now including various other groups who are being oppressed. It is a useful prism to use where caste has not been explored properly. What I would want to know is who is the government to decide on this? The government is an appointed agency, what is their locus standi here?”

Comments

TRENDING

Mystery around Gujarat PSU 'transfer' of Rs 250 crore to Canadian firm Karnalyte

By AK Luke, IAS (Retd)*
While returning from a Board meeting of the Oil India Limited (OIL) in Ahmedabad some time in 2012, two officers of the Gujarat State Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd (GSFC), Nanavaty and Patel,  saw me off at the airport. They said they were proceeding to Canada in connection with a project GSFC had entered into with a company there. As we were running late, I hastily wished them the best.

Savarkar in Ahmedabad 'declared' two-nation theory in 1937, Jinnah followed 3 years later

By Our Representative
One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

Indians have made 119 nations their ‘karma bhumi’: US-based Hindu NGO tells Rupani

Counterview Desk
In a stinging letter to Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani, the US-based Hindus for Human Rights (HfHR), referring to the report citing his justification for the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) – that “while Muslims can choose any one of the 150 Islamic countries in the world (for residence), India is the only country for Hindus" – has said, he should remember, Hindus have made several countries, including USA, their home.

J&K continues to be haunted, as parts of India 'degenerate' into quasi-Kashmir situation

By Rajendran Narayanan*, Sandeep Pandey**
“Jab har saans mein bandook dikhe toh baccha kaise bekhauf rahe?” (How can a child be fearless when she sees a gun in every breath?) remarked Anwar, a gardener from Srinagar, when asked about the situation in Kashmir. On November 30, 2019, a walk through an iron gate in a quiet neighbourhood of Srinagar took us inside a public school. It was 11 am when typically every school is abuzz with activity. Not here though.

Tata Mundra's possible closure? Power ministry's 'pressure tactic' on consumer states

By Bharat Patel*
Tata power has announced to the Union Ministry of Power that Tata Power may be forced to stop operating  its imported coal-based Mundra Ultra-Mega Power Project (UMPP) after February, 2020. It is not only unfortunate but also criminal that irreversible damage has been caused to the fragile ecosystem of Mundra coast for a project that will have a running life of only seven years.

Population control? 10% Indian couples want to delay next pregnancy, but fail

Counterview Desk
Shireen Jejeebhoy, director at Aksha Centre for Equity and Wellbeing, previously senior associate at the Population Council, India, argues that the debate on the country's population was fuelled by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day address to the nation, where he drew attention to “concern” about the challenges posed by this ‘exploding’ population growth, needs to centre around the promotion of rights and education, instead of the language of explosion and the threat of coercion that this term implies.

Upendra Baxi on foolish excellence, Indian judges and Consitutional cockroaches

By Rajiv Shah
In a controversial assertion, top legal expert Upendra Baxi has sought to question India's Constitution makers for neglecting human rights and social justice. Addressing an elite audience in Ahmedabad, Prof Baxi said, the constitutional idea of India enunciated by the Constituent Assembly tried to resolve four key conflicting concepts: governance, development, rights and justice.

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam*
In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.