Skip to main content

Excerpt from 'Mediapart' article that quotes ex-French president François Hollande on "dubious" Rafale deal

Feb 2017: François Hollande with Anil Ambani 
Counterview Desk
Following the revelation in a French journal “Mediapart” that it is Government of India which chose Anil Ambani's Reliance Defence and France had no choice, there is a furore across India on how Prime Minister Narendra Modi “paid back” to an industrial close to him for supporting him. The French journal quotes former French president François Hollande to say the Indian government had proposed Anil Ambani’s Reliance Defence as the offset partner in the Rafale deal and "we did not have a say in this."

Reproduced below are relevant excerpts from a free translation of the article, "En Inde, François Hollande s’invite dans l’affaire des avions Rafale" (François Hollande, his partner’s film, and the French fighter jet sale to India) published in “Mediapart” (click HERE to read full free translation of the article):
...The sale of the Rafale has become a state affair in New Delhi. Suspecting a "huge scam", including the price of aircraft and the role of the Reliance group, opposition parliamentarians seized Thursday the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), the Indian Court of Accounts, a request for investigation into this market for "mismanagement of public funds, endangering national security, favoritism and violation of the legal provisions of the markets by Dassault Aviation".
At the heart of the memorandum filed with the CAG, the French firm is questioned for the "compensation" agreement signed with Anil Ambani, which requires Dassault to reinvest locally 50% of the amount of the sale. The French armament group, led by Eric Trappier, told “Mediapart” that he would make "no comment".
The opposition also accuses Prime Minister Narendra Modi of favoritism for "ensuring" that the compensation contract is vested in Ambani's company, which has never hidden its support for the head of government.
Reliance Defense Limited is also, they note, "a private company with no experience in the manufacture of fighter jets", which is also recorded "twelve days" before the announcement, on March 28, 2015, of the purchase of 36 Rafale aircraft by Narendra Modi during a visit to Paris.
Joined by “Mediapart”, François Hollande certifies that he was "not at all informed" of this partnership and that he "knew nothing" about the Ambani company. The presidential trip is indeed devoted to other issues, since it is to conclude the sale of the Rafale – a possible third market for the aircraft manufacturer, after Egypt and Qatar. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said, as of January 25, he has "found an intergovernmental agreement" with Francois Hollande on the purchase of aircraft.
"I intervened in this case with two prime ministers, to say that I was sensitive to this negotiation”, says Francois Hollande to “Mediapart”. “Initially, the market was to be 126 aircraft, and then when the change of government, the Indians reformulated their proposal, less attractive for us, since it was only 36 aircraft. But the manufacture was planned in France, contrary to the previous proposal, so we lost on one side, but we won on the other."
A Dassault Reliance Aerospace Limited facility, inaugurated in Oct 2017
But the new device also provides for this "compensation" contract, now criticized, between Dassault Aviation and its partner ... Reliance. How and by whom was this selected?
"We did not have a say in this," continues François Hollande. “The Indian government proposed this service group, and Dassault negotiated with Ambani. We did not have a choice, we took the interlocutor who was given to us. That's why, on the other hand, this group did not have to give me any thanks for anything. I could not even imagine that there was any connection to a film by Julie Gayet."
This version contradicts that of the Indian authorities, who maintain that Dassault alone selected Reliance. "The Ministry of Defense played no role in the selection of Indian partners by the seller," responded Anil Ambani in a press release issued in August...
...Given the extent of the questions posed by opposition parliamentarians at Comptroller and Auditor General of India, the Dassault-Ambani affair is just beginning. One of the main grievances of elected officials is the cancellation of the initial tender by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who came to power in May 2014. The previous government put on track the purchase of 126 aircraft, and a "working agreement" between Dassault Aviation and the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) public armaments group stipulated that 70 out of 108 aircraft would be manufactured in India. However, on April 10, 2015, Narendra Modi announced during a visit to François Hollande in Paris, the purchase of 36 aircraft, built in France, for 7.5 billion euros. According to the opposition, Modi could not simply cancel the current call for tenders. Neither to make this announcement without offering Dassault's competitors a new bid submission. In addition, the new agreement increases the unit price of aircraft by 300% and is catastrophic for the HAL Group's order book.
Dassault  CEO Éric Trappier at the Paris Air Show, 2015
The defense branch of Reliance, the group of Anil Ambani, is already in the loop. It was registered 12 days before the announcement of Modi. Another subsidiary, Reliance Aerostructure Ltd, is incorporated 14 days later. Anil Ambani is a staunch supporter of the Prime Minister. As “Le Monde” pointed out on his birthday in 2016, he called Modi "leader of the leaders" and "king of kings". In September 2016, the Minister of Defense, Jean-Yves Le Drian, validates the details of the intergovernmental agreement with his Indian counterpart, Manohar Parrikar.
President François Hollande also receives Anil Ambani during his visit to Paris in February 2017, following a "meeting with the Ministry of Defense" . After the election of Emmanuel Macron, it is the Minister of Defense Florence Parly who recovers the file. She traveled to India in October 2017 to open one of the facilities of the Dassault Reliance Aerospace Limited (DRAL) joint venture, Ambani Aerospace Park, in Mihan, Nagpur. The duo announces the investment of 100 million euros in the manufacture of components for the Rafale.
A drop of water compared to the contract. "There is a serious industrial risk for Dassault, because we are dealing with a company that has never built a plane and never touched the defense ," said a French defense analyst. “The offsets provided represent huge sums of money, and there is the question of the ability of local industry to absorb technology transfers."
This specialist specifies that the Indian Rafale will have nuclear missions, that it is expected that they carry SCALP missiles (manufactured by MDBA), are equipped for high-speed attacks in the enemy device (Deep Strike)...
---
Click HERE to read unabridged free English translation of the French article published in “Mediapart”

Comments

TRENDING

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra   There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.

The cost of being Indian: How inequality and market logic redefine rights

By Vikas Gupta   We, the people of India, are engaged in a daily tryst—read: struggle—for basic human rights. For the seemingly well-to-do, the wish list includes constant water supply, clean air, safe roads, punctual public transportation, and crime-free neighbourhoods. For those further down the ladder, the struggle is starker: food that fills the stomach, water that doesn’t sicken, medicines that don’t kill, houses that don’t flood, habitats at safe distances from polluted streams or garbage piles, and exploitation-free environments in the public institutions they are compelled to navigate.

Why India must urgently strengthen its policies for an ageing population

By Bharat Dogra   A quiet but far-reaching demographic transformation is reshaping much of the world. As life expectancy rises and birth rates fall, societies are witnessing a rapid increase in the proportion of older people. This shift has profound implications for public policy, and the need to strengthen frameworks for healthy and secure ageing has never been more urgent. India is among the countries where these pressures will intensify most sharply in the coming decades.

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor*  Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...