Skip to main content

Rafale deal: Reliance Aerospace a "suitable partner", where financial interests of India, France converge

Anil Ambani with Dassault CEO Eric Trappier
By Shantanu Basu*
This is the Bofors replay. The French government and ours are equal partners, which is why both are going out of their way to put out half-cooked denials and unconvincing statements. I refuse to believe that Reliance Aerospace (RA) developed the capacity to produce Rafale parts in barely two weeks before the administrative approval to the deal was signed. And that Dassault contracted a firm that is neck-deep in debt, in default of overseas obligations, and ship supplies to the Indian Navy setting the naval shipbuilding programme back by at least a decade and have no known capacity to manufacture warplane parts (at least 70% of the total).
No arms producer can sell or outsource even a single nut-bolt combine without a slew of clearances from their respective governments. To expect that the French Government knew nothing is preposterous, for, in defence exports, 'commercial' terms are invariably secondary. The same holds true of Dassault, for whom these 36 planes have come as a lifesaver with limited sales. Subramaniam Swamy certainly has a point here.
For its part, the Government of India is similarly charged with assuring that the selected domestic partner of Dassault is verified for professional attainment and market reputation before being licensed to set up business. More so, since the state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL), for all its inefficiency and poor quality, has remained in business for over six decades now does not have orders beyond another three years, yet has over 10,000 employees. Not just that, the financial sanction to Rafale was probably signed only after the subsidiary offset agreement with RA was inked and its plant had come up in a Nagpur suburb.
Moreover, the speed with which RA was granted requisite land in a BJP-ruled state-owned industrial park, all seemingly within a fortnight, is a red flag. Shortly after this, they even financed the building of a plant -- that too would not have been a cheap proposition. How was RA plant financed with its defaulter status? Which Indian financial institute extended them credit?
Hollande's response is amusing. A seller with reportedly contemporary technology will never sell technology that is the latest innovation for fear of duplication by enemies (one of the reasons why the US is sanctioning countries that buy Russian equipment like the S-400). If one is to go by top IAF officers proclaiming the Rafale as a super warplane, then the seller would necessarily impose the strictest of conditions for partial tech transfer (such as for overseas manufacturing of spares).
Here is where Hollande's statement falls flat. A $1.60 million (Rs 12 crore) infusion by Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (ADAG) through an Indian-headed investment firm was hardly any conflict of interest in a Rs 60K crore contract for Hollande's lady love, Julie Gayet. ADAG is unable to pay back public sector bank (PSB) loans but finds money for a foreign movie! Hollande would be cheapskate if he sold out the Rafale deal for a Rs 12 crore commission.
Further, if Hollande was so unhappy with the choice of RA, why did he go ahead with the terms India reportedly 'imposed' upon him? Surely France is not a tinpot dictatorship. In fact, French anti-corruption legislation could now be cited by Hollande's detractors and he could be brought to book that would end his political carrier, probably also send him to jail. The answer and Hollande's only defence lies in Dassault's nearly dry order book. The Dassault-Hollande nexus is only too evident, the same way it is for India, both ADAG and Dassault sailing in similar financial boats. From Giscard d'Estaing onward, a line of French Presidents has had their hands in the till. And Dassault has been doing business in India for over five decades now.
RA is the most suitable partner in whom the financial interests of the Governments of France and India converge, hence Hollande's term 'interlocutor' (dalal/middleman). And this the result of an inter-governmental agreement that is the most opaque way of purchase of defence equipment that AK Anthony perfected in his decade-long screwing of the defence services. Like all Indian conglomerates, ADAG has subsidiaries overseas in tax havens, a convenient add-on for its business profile.
What is the most alarming is the manner in which high-level corruption is fast becoming an official way of collecting election and party funds in furtherance of dangerously divisive ideologies. What is worse is that import substitution is increasingly becoming a byword for crony capitalism and election fund collection. It is doubtful whether RA will manufacture or assemble parts for the Rafale in India. This is not the only case of screwdriver technology being palmed off as Indian-made, e.g., mobile phones.
A new super oligarchy is emerging, that of an entrepreneurial party whose political party whose political and economic agenda coincide with those of businesses that are at a financial disadvantage (bankrupt or sold for a song). It is only natural such businesses would do anything to save their companies. Today it is the corporate sector, it could be your start-up or partnership next.
When all these are put together, these explain why UPA's manufactured scams are quietly being laid to rest in law courts and tax tribunals, as are criminal cases against ruling party legislators. These also explain why an FCRA amendment with unparalleled retrospective effect was passed unanimously in Parliament. The manner in which Central PSUs and LIC, etc. are being regularly milked is at variance with so-called development work being undertaken. That is why the Union Budget has ceased to be discussed in Parliament, an irrelevance. Even our defence service heads and top officers have become de facto party employees.
Please vote responsibly in General Election 2019, if it is held at all. That may be our last chance. If you are not satisfied with a candidate, please use the NOTA option. It is high time we looked away from the present-day politicians to a younger and untainted leadership. In the meantime, with rising uncertainty in our political system, be prepared for more Big Bang actions, that may not have your best interests at heart.
---
* Indian Audit and Accounts Service officer, Government of India. Source: Author’s Facebook timeline

Comments

TRENDING

Mystery around Gujarat PSU 'transfer' of Rs 250 crore to Canadian firm Karnalyte

By AK Luke, IAS (Retd)*
While returning from a Board meeting of the Oil India Limited (OIL) in Ahmedabad some time in 2012, two officers of the Gujarat State Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd (GSFC), Nanavaty and Patel,  saw me off at the airport. They said they were proceeding to Canada in connection with a project GSFC had entered into with a company there. As we were running late, I hastily wished them the best.

Savarkar in Ahmedabad 'declared' two-nation theory in 1937, Jinnah followed 3 years later

By Our Representative
One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

Indians have made 119 nations their ‘karma bhumi’: US-based Hindu NGO tells Rupani

Counterview Desk
In a stinging letter to Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani, the US-based Hindus for Human Rights (HfHR), referring to the report citing his justification for the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) – that “while Muslims can choose any one of the 150 Islamic countries in the world (for residence), India is the only country for Hindus" – has said, he should remember, Hindus have made several countries, including USA, their home.

J&K continues to be haunted, as parts of India 'degenerate' into quasi-Kashmir situation

By Rajendran Narayanan*, Sandeep Pandey**
“Jab har saans mein bandook dikhe toh baccha kaise bekhauf rahe?” (How can a child be fearless when she sees a gun in every breath?) remarked Anwar, a gardener from Srinagar, when asked about the situation in Kashmir. On November 30, 2019, a walk through an iron gate in a quiet neighbourhood of Srinagar took us inside a public school. It was 11 am when typically every school is abuzz with activity. Not here though.

Tata Mundra's possible closure? Power ministry's 'pressure tactic' on consumer states

By Bharat Patel*
Tata power has announced to the Union Ministry of Power that Tata Power may be forced to stop operating  its imported coal-based Mundra Ultra-Mega Power Project (UMPP) after February, 2020. It is not only unfortunate but also criminal that irreversible damage has been caused to the fragile ecosystem of Mundra coast for a project that will have a running life of only seven years.

Population control? 10% Indian couples want to delay next pregnancy, but fail

Counterview Desk
Shireen Jejeebhoy, director at Aksha Centre for Equity and Wellbeing, previously senior associate at the Population Council, India, argues that the debate on the country's population was fuelled by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day address to the nation, where he drew attention to “concern” about the challenges posed by this ‘exploding’ population growth, needs to centre around the promotion of rights and education, instead of the language of explosion and the threat of coercion that this term implies.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Upendra Baxi on foolish excellence, Indian judges and Consitutional cockroaches

By Rajiv Shah
In a controversial assertion, top legal expert Upendra Baxi has sought to question India's Constitution makers for neglecting human rights and social justice. Addressing an elite audience in Ahmedabad, Prof Baxi said, the constitutional idea of India enunciated by the Constituent Assembly tried to resolve four key conflicting concepts: governance, development, rights and justice.

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam*
In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.