Skip to main content

Rafale deal: Reliance Aerospace a "suitable partner", where financial interests of India, France converge

Anil Ambani with Dassault CEO Eric Trappier
By Shantanu Basu*
This is the Bofors replay. The French government and ours are equal partners, which is why both are going out of their way to put out half-cooked denials and unconvincing statements. I refuse to believe that Reliance Aerospace (RA) developed the capacity to produce Rafale parts in barely two weeks before the administrative approval to the deal was signed. And that Dassault contracted a firm that is neck-deep in debt, in default of overseas obligations, and ship supplies to the Indian Navy setting the naval shipbuilding programme back by at least a decade and have no known capacity to manufacture warplane parts (at least 70% of the total).
No arms producer can sell or outsource even a single nut-bolt combine without a slew of clearances from their respective governments. To expect that the French Government knew nothing is preposterous, for, in defence exports, 'commercial' terms are invariably secondary. The same holds true of Dassault, for whom these 36 planes have come as a lifesaver with limited sales. Subramaniam Swamy certainly has a point here.
For its part, the Government of India is similarly charged with assuring that the selected domestic partner of Dassault is verified for professional attainment and market reputation before being licensed to set up business. More so, since the state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL), for all its inefficiency and poor quality, has remained in business for over six decades now does not have orders beyond another three years, yet has over 10,000 employees. Not just that, the financial sanction to Rafale was probably signed only after the subsidiary offset agreement with RA was inked and its plant had come up in a Nagpur suburb.
Moreover, the speed with which RA was granted requisite land in a BJP-ruled state-owned industrial park, all seemingly within a fortnight, is a red flag. Shortly after this, they even financed the building of a plant -- that too would not have been a cheap proposition. How was RA plant financed with its defaulter status? Which Indian financial institute extended them credit?
Hollande's response is amusing. A seller with reportedly contemporary technology will never sell technology that is the latest innovation for fear of duplication by enemies (one of the reasons why the US is sanctioning countries that buy Russian equipment like the S-400). If one is to go by top IAF officers proclaiming the Rafale as a super warplane, then the seller would necessarily impose the strictest of conditions for partial tech transfer (such as for overseas manufacturing of spares).
Here is where Hollande's statement falls flat. A $1.60 million (Rs 12 crore) infusion by Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (ADAG) through an Indian-headed investment firm was hardly any conflict of interest in a Rs 60K crore contract for Hollande's lady love, Julie Gayet. ADAG is unable to pay back public sector bank (PSB) loans but finds money for a foreign movie! Hollande would be cheapskate if he sold out the Rafale deal for a Rs 12 crore commission.
Further, if Hollande was so unhappy with the choice of RA, why did he go ahead with the terms India reportedly 'imposed' upon him? Surely France is not a tinpot dictatorship. In fact, French anti-corruption legislation could now be cited by Hollande's detractors and he could be brought to book that would end his political carrier, probably also send him to jail. The answer and Hollande's only defence lies in Dassault's nearly dry order book. The Dassault-Hollande nexus is only too evident, the same way it is for India, both ADAG and Dassault sailing in similar financial boats. From Giscard d'Estaing onward, a line of French Presidents has had their hands in the till. And Dassault has been doing business in India for over five decades now.
RA is the most suitable partner in whom the financial interests of the Governments of France and India converge, hence Hollande's term 'interlocutor' (dalal/middleman). And this the result of an inter-governmental agreement that is the most opaque way of purchase of defence equipment that AK Anthony perfected in his decade-long screwing of the defence services. Like all Indian conglomerates, ADAG has subsidiaries overseas in tax havens, a convenient add-on for its business profile.
What is the most alarming is the manner in which high-level corruption is fast becoming an official way of collecting election and party funds in furtherance of dangerously divisive ideologies. What is worse is that import substitution is increasingly becoming a byword for crony capitalism and election fund collection. It is doubtful whether RA will manufacture or assemble parts for the Rafale in India. This is not the only case of screwdriver technology being palmed off as Indian-made, e.g., mobile phones.
A new super oligarchy is emerging, that of an entrepreneurial party whose political party whose political and economic agenda coincide with those of businesses that are at a financial disadvantage (bankrupt or sold for a song). It is only natural such businesses would do anything to save their companies. Today it is the corporate sector, it could be your start-up or partnership next.
When all these are put together, these explain why UPA's manufactured scams are quietly being laid to rest in law courts and tax tribunals, as are criminal cases against ruling party legislators. These also explain why an FCRA amendment with unparalleled retrospective effect was passed unanimously in Parliament. The manner in which Central PSUs and LIC, etc. are being regularly milked is at variance with so-called development work being undertaken. That is why the Union Budget has ceased to be discussed in Parliament, an irrelevance. Even our defence service heads and top officers have become de facto party employees.
Please vote responsibly in General Election 2019, if it is held at all. That may be our last chance. If you are not satisfied with a candidate, please use the NOTA option. It is high time we looked away from the present-day politicians to a younger and untainted leadership. In the meantime, with rising uncertainty in our political system, be prepared for more Big Bang actions, that may not have your best interests at heart.
---
* Indian Audit and Accounts Service officer, Government of India. Source: Author’s Facebook timeline

Comments

TRENDING

'Enough evidence' in Indian tradition to support legal basis for same-sex marriage

By Iyce Malhotra, Joseph Mathai, Sandeep Chachra*  The ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court on same-sex marriage provides space for much-needed conversations on issues that have hitherto remained “invisible” or engaged with patriarchal locker room humour. We must recognize that people with diverse sexualities and complex gender identities have faced discrimination, stigma and decades of oppression. Their issues have mainly remained buried in dominant social discourse, and many view them with deep insecurities.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Victim of communal violence, Christians in Manipur want Church leadership to speak up

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  The first eleven days of May 2023 have, in many ways, been a defining period of Indian history! Plenty has happened in a rapid-fire stream of events. Ironically, each one of them are indicators of how crimes and the criminalisation of society has become the ‘new norm’; these include, the May Day rallies with a focus on the four labour codes which are patently against the rights of workers; the U S Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) released its Annual Report on 1 May stating that conditions for religious freedom in India “continued to worsen in 2022”; the continued protest by the Indian women wrestlers at Jantar Mantar for the expulsion of the chief of the Indian Wrestlers Federation on very serious allegations; the Elections in Karnataka on 10 May (with communalism and corruption as the mainstay); the release of the fake, derogative and insensitive film ‘The Kerala Story’; the release of World Free Press Index on 3 May which places India

Delhi HC rules in favour of retired Air Force officer 'overcharged' for Covid treatment

By Rosamma Thomas*  In a decision of May 22, 2023, the Delhi High Court ruled in favour of petitioner Group Captain Suresh Khanna who was under treatment at CK Birla Hospital, Gurugram, between April 28 and May 5, 2021, for a period of eight days, for Covid-19 pneumonia. The petitioner had to pay Rs 3,55,286 as treatment costs, but the Ex-Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (ECHS) only reimbursed him for Rs 1,83,748, on the basis of government-approved rates. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Unlike other revolutionaries, Hindutva icon wrote 5 mercy petitions to British masters

By Shamsul Islam*  The Hindutva icon VD Savarkar of the RSS-BJP rulers of India submitted not one, two,or three but five mercy petitions to the British masters! Savarkarites argue: “There are no evidences to prove that Savarkar collaborated with the British for his release from jail. In fact, his appeal for release was a ruse. He was well aware of the political developments outside and wanted to be part of it. So he kept requesting for his release. But the British authorities did not trust him a bit” (YD Phadke, ‘A complex Hero’, "The Indian Expres"s, August 31, 2004)

India joining US sponsored trade pillar to hurt Indian farmers, 'promote' GM seeds, food

Counterview Desk  As many as 32 civil society organisations (CSOs), in a letter to Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal on the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) and India joining the trade pillar, have said that its provisions will allow the US to ensure a more favourable regulatory regime “for enhancing its exports of genetically modified (GM) seeds and GM food”, underlining, it will “significantly hurt the livelihoods of Indian farmers.”

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam* In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

Undermining law, breastfeeding? Businesses 'using' celebrities to promote baby food

By Rajiv Shah  A report prepared by the top child welfare NGO, Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India (BPNI), has identified as many as 15 offenders allegedly violating the Indian baby food law, the Infant Milk Substitutes Feeding Bottles, and Infant Foods (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Act 1992, and Amendment Act 2003 (IMS Act), stating, compliance with the law “seems to be dwindling by the day.”