Skip to main content

Starring Narendra Modi, in and as Gandhi: How a certain TV channel attempted to appropriate a great legacy

By Darshan Desai*
[Gandhi] spins every day for 1 hr. beginning usually at 4. All members of his ashram must spin. He and his followers encourage everyone to spin. Even M. B-W was encouraged to lay [aside] her camera to spin. . . . When I remarked that both photography and spinning were handicrafts, they told me seriously, “The greater of the 2 is spinning.” Spinning is raised to the heights almost of a religion with Gandhi and his followers. The spinning wheel is sort of an Ikon to them. Spinning is a cure all, and is spoken of in terms of the highest poetry...
These are the type-written notes that accompanied legendary photojournalist Margaret Bourke-White’s eternal picture of Mahatma Gandhi on his spinning wheel (mimicked now by Narendra Modi) that she sent to the LIFE magazine in 1946. Her few words speak of the depth of a journalist who could capture the soul of the Mahatma and his ideology in just one shot.
Cut to 2017. Two poor journalists on a self-fashioned Times Now debate were trying hard to position their defence of the pitchforking of Narendra Modi in place of Mahatma Gandhi on the calendar and diary of the Khadi and Village Industries Commission.
Here is what they did: They showed old calenders and diaries of previous years when Gandhi’s picture on the wheel was removed and replaced by images of colourful khadi threads or a plain diary cover. They wanted the Congress to respond to the fact that Gandhi was removed from the calendar and dairy in their time.
The a la Arnab Goswami stress on the word removed sounded as though saying ‘the BJP has only replaced Gandhi with Modi, you people removed him.’ Nobody bothered to listen that no political leader had ever put his picture there. (Perhaps, according to them, the nation doesn’t want to know this.)
Symbolising the times that we live in now, the Times Now journalists brought themselves to a Facebook-like debate, sorry tete-e-tete, saying Modi has become a brand ambassador of khadi, he has made khadi a fashion statement, khadi sales have gone up dramatically because of him, so what’s the big deal if his picture is put there. They demanded a convincing rejoinder to this, stopping short of Arnab’s signature “the nation wants to know”.
At another level, when pointed out that Gandhi, khadi and the charkha were the symbols of non-violence and Modi was just the opposite of it, the anchors started screaming “what about 1984, what about Bhagalpur riots”. They sounded as nauseating as the BJP saying exactly this in the thick of the bloody 2002 massacre in Gujarat under Modi.
Margaret Bourke-White would perhaps have been pained that two kids had brought down to gutter the journalism she took to lofty levels when covering Gandhi. But the larger saner media in India does not bother for they will not allow a certain TV channel to appropriate their legacy.
Well, the point here is not how much illiterate about Gandhi were the two journalists for they were only trying to toe a tutored line. It is another matter that they badly need a tuition from Arnab on how to do this without so crudely exposing themselves.
The point here is the BJP’s argument which the journalists furthered about how khadi sales have jacked up with Modi emerging as its brand ambassador and created a fashion statement with his half-sleeve kurtas. It is as crude as comparing Amitabh Bachchan promoting Gujarat with his khushboo Gujarat ki campaign and emerging as its brand ambassador; and so if tourism develops in the State his picture should be put up prominently on all tourism material.
By the way, the Modi kurta is not hand spun unlike the khadi of Gandhi and those who know the spirit of this know the difference. Expecting those two journalists and the minions of Modi to understand this would be putting too much burden on the poor souls.
A part of this argument is also that Modi has done more than anyone else to promote khadi. Times Now says “what’s the big deal” and BJP says “what’s wrong (he has a right to replace Gandhi)”. It is like saying Virat Kohli is the in-thing and so Mahendra Singh Dhoni should go.
By the same argument, Times Now and the bhaktas may well say someday that Modi has transformed entire India, in fact the woman anchor stopped short of saying this when she referred to Make in India, and so it is no big deal if Gandhi’s statues are replaced with those of Modi and all MG Roads in the country become NaMo Roads. The BJP will say what’s wrong, he has a right.
In the cacophony of all this, there are only a few to tell our burgeoning young population that khadi was not a sheer product nor was the spinning wheel a mundane machine. They were the eternal symbols of India’s ethos that Gandhi singularly represented, of the uncanny unity of the varied people of this country in the middle of mindboggling diversity.
They were a way of life. Gandhi told us how: “Spin and spin after due deliberation… ‘Due deliberation’ means realization that charkha or act of spinning is the symbol of non-violence. Ponder; it will be self-evident.”
Last but not the least, the original inventor and promoter of khadi never called Margaret Bourke-White to put together his portfolio for a modeling career. Modi’s picture on the KVIC material is posed for. No big deal, indeed, he has a portfolio of his own.
---
Editor, Development News Network, Ahmedabad

Comments

TRENDING

India's GDP down by 50%, not 23%, job loss 200 million not 122 million: Top economist

By Our Representative One of India’s topmost economists has estimated that India’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) decline was around 50%, and not 23%, as claimed by the Government of India’s top data body, National Statistical Organization (NSO). Prof Arun Kumar, who is Malcolm S Adiseshiah chair professor, Institute of Social Sciences, New Delhi, said this was delivering a web policy speech, organised by the Impact and Policy Research Institute (IMPRI), New Delhi.

JP advised RSS to give up Hindu Rashtra, disband itself: Ex-IAS officer tells Modi

Counterview Desk
Major MG Devasahayam IAS (Retd), chairman, People-First, in an open letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the occasion of Jayprakash Narain’s (JP’s) death anniversary (October 11) has wondered whether he remembers “a patriot called Jayaprakash Narayan”. Recalling what JP thought on issues such as communalism, freedom, democracy, Hindutva etc., Devasahayam says, Modi has been been doing “the very opposite of the principles and values for which JP lived and died.”

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

UP chief secretary, DGP have 'surrendered' to political diktat: 92 retired IAS, IPS officials

Counterview Desk
In an open letter to Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath, 92 retired IAS, IFS and IPS bureaucrats, commenting on “blatant violations of the rule law” following the Hathras incident, have blamed that the Chief Secretary and the Director General of Police for abjectly failing to exercise control over a “highly compromised” administration the state.

Hathras reflects Manu's mindset dominates: 'Women are false, it's in their nature to seduce'

By Parijat Ghosh, Dibyendu Chaudhuri*
The woman died and then we woke up to protest. She was alive for two weeks after the heinous incident. Many of us even didn’t notice what had happened at Hathras, how she fought during the next 15 days. Those who noticed, many of them were not sure what actually had happened. So much so, we as a nation were more busy in finding out who among the Bollywood actresses were taking drugs, who smoked weed, who had ‘inappropriate’ or more than one relationship, what kind of private conversations they had in their chat boxes and what not!

Gujarat literati flutter: State Akademi autonomy curb a Sahitya Parishad poll issue?

By Dankesh Oza*
The 115-year-old Gujarati Sahitya Parishad is in election mode. More than 3,000 life members of the Parishad are set to elect its 52nd president and 40 plus central working committee (CWC) members, which in turn will elect its executive and two vice presidents, six secretaries and a treasurer for the coming three years (from 2021 to 2023).

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur*
Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Atrocities against Dalits: Why don't MPs, MLAs from the community ever speak up?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
In Gujarat, a young Dalit activist lawyer Devji Maheshwari, belonging to the Backward and Minority Communities Employees Federation (BAMSCEF) was killed in Surat, allegedly by a goon who was warning him against his Facebook posts not to speak up against Brahmanism. Facts have come to light suggesting there are other issues also which led to the murder, mostly related to land disputes, many a time ignored by activists.

Delhi riots: Even British didn't accuse Bhagat Singh of reading Lenin, Jack London

By Vikash Narain Rai*
After the #BlackLifeMatters movement seriously tested the credibility of police across America, the Houston police chief Art Acevado talked of ending “lawful but awful” policing. No comparison, but in India, a citizens’ committee comprising former top judges and bureaucrats is now set to inquire into the role of the state machinery and media in handling the February 2020 Delhi violence, which followed protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), “as the investigation by the Delhi Police has evoked extensive critical commentary in recent times.”