Skip to main content

Attack on top academic: Why Chhattisgarh govt isn't acting against unruly mob, cops, ask Medha Patkar, Aruna Roy

Bela Bhatia
By A Representative
A group of 35 well-known activists led by Narmada Bachao Andolan’s Medha Patkar and Magsaysay award winning right to information campaigner Aruna Roy have said that Chhattisgarh chief minister Raman Singh’s assurance of safety following the recent attack on top academic Bela Bhatia has not followed with "any strong action".
Singh's "assurance" comes a day after Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi's support to Bela Bhatia. Meeting her, Singh, who met her in in Jagdalpur, assured her of "all protection and the freedom to continue her work among the tribals", adding, she could "continue to live at her present location", and if feeling insecure, she could be "alternative accommodation in Bastar."
Insisting that there has not been “any strong action on unruly mobs and​ ​abusive, law-breaking police officers” who were responsible for the mob attack on Bhatia’s house, situated in Parpa village near Jagdalpur in Bastar region, the statement says, failure to take firm action suggests there would be no let down in threats on activists who are fighting for tribals’ cause.
Others who have signed the statement include Nikhil Dey and Shankar Singh of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan, Prafulla Samantara of the Lok Shakti Abhiyan, Lingraj Azad of the Samajwadi Jan Parishad, Binayak Sen and Kavita Srivastava of People’s Union for Civil Liberties, well-known Gandhian activist Sandeep Pandey, Vimal Bhai of the Matu Jan Sangathan, Anand Mazgaonkar of the Paryavaran Suraksh Samiti, and Bilal Khan of the Ghar Bachao Ghar Banao Andolan.
Issued by the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), the statement says that the attackers, who asked Bhatia to leave Parpa village within 24 hours, were “non-state and state actors” who feel threatened by her very presence, because she has “exposed” human rights violations of the adivasis and activists by security forces the name of combating extremism.
Noting that the response of Bastar Inspector General of Police (IGP) SRP Kalluri to such attacks has been “extremely offensive, derogatory and abusive” especially to women activists, the statement says, the Chhattisgarh government has been forced to “break its silence on Bastar” because of the country-wide protests.
“However”, the statement notes, “While the chief minister has assured safety of Bhatia, his absolute silence on the mob violence, police atrocities, human rights abuses and the unruly-unlawful behavior of Kalluri is a matter of concern.”
Recalling that Bhatia is an academic of international repute, the statement says, as member of many government committees she has exposed the “deplorable situation” of the adivasis in the region, who are caught in a permanent war-like situation”.
The statement says, the attack follows Bhatia’s helping hand to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to visit adivasi hamlets and speak to the adivasi survivors of rape, sexual assault and violence at the hands of the state’s security forces.
It adds, “Clearly, this did not go well with those in power who have unleashed a war on the adivasis to displace them of their land, to facilitate corporate loot of the minerals and natural resources in the name of ‘development’.”
The statement asks the chief minister to take “full responsibility of securing the fundamental rights of Bela Bhatia and other human rights activists, lawyers to reside at a place of their choice and discharge their professional and constitutional responsibilities without fear of violence or false cases.”
It also seeks “immediate suspension of IGP Kalluri, registration of FIR against him for his widely-reported abusive and intimidatory messages and ensuring that he faces the NHRC soon to respond to charges against him.”

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”