Skip to main content

Sahara-Birla payoff documents clear evidence of bribery to politicians, babus: Ex-Delhi HC judge to CDBT

Justice Shah
By A Representative
Former Delhi High Court judge, Justice AP Shah, has in a letter to the chairperson, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), said that documents seized in the bribery and corruption in the by now well-known famous Sahara-Birla payoffs case are a “clear evidence" of systematic bribery of politicians, including several Chief Ministers and public servants by these business groups.
Shah’s letter follows the order of the IT Settlement Commission (ITSC) in which the Sahara group got immunity. One of the most controversial entries, which are part of the rejected documents, is the alleged payment to ‘Gujarat CM’, interpreted widely as a total payment of not less than Rs 55 crore to Narendra Modi as chief minister in 2013.
Claiming possession of “authentic copies of the seized documents recovered in the raids”, Shah says, the CBI, in the case of Birla, and the Income Tax Department, the case of Sahara, reportedly recovered and seized documents, notes, laptops and huge amounts of cash.
Writing as chairman of the Citizens Whistleblowers Forum (CWF), Shah asks CBDT to “challenge” the order passed by ITSC granting immunity to Sahara, insisting, these documents show systematic bribery of politicians and and public servants.
However, he regrets, “Despite this evidence the same was not referred to CBI for a criminal investigation”, though the stand taken by the IT department had shown that it “disbelieved” the bogus explanations given by Sahara and Birla officers and had held that the documents seized were “correct/non-fictitious and depicted the true state of affairs.”
The letter insists, “The circumstances make out a more than adequate case for directing a credible and independent investigation as per the law laid down by Constitution Bench of Supreme Court”, adding, "Facts make out a clear case for criminal investigation."
Those who are part of the CWF include Justice Santosh Hegde, former Supreme Court judge; Admiral Ramdas, former Chief of Naval Staff;, Wajahat Habibullah, first chief information commissioner, Dr EAS Sarma, former secretary, Government of India; Aruna Roy, well-known social activist; Jagdeep Chhokar, with the Association for Democratic Reforms; and and Prashant Bhushan, advocate, Supreme Court.
Shah's letter has been released by sabrangindia.in, a website run by top human rights activist Teesta Setalvad, known for her fight for the 2002 Gujarat riots victims.
“In the Sahara case”, Shah says, “Some of the relevant seized documents are the printouts of the three Excel sheets showing cash receipt of over Rs 115 crore and cash outflow of over Rs 113 crore during a short period of 10 months.”
Pointing out that the first sheet goes up to March 4, 2014, and the other two go up to February 22, 2014 and November 12, 2013, Shah insists, “The entries in all the three sheets are tallying with each other. The logs suggest that cash was apparently transferred to several important public figures.”
He adds, “The Excel sheets show the date of payment, to whom money was paid, the amount paid, through whom it was paid and the place of payment. Therefore, they contain enough information to initiate a thorough investigation.”
As for to the Birla case, Shah says, the IT department interrogated one of the senior officers on oath, and he stated that in his statement, recorded on oath, that he had recorded in handwriting “unaccounted cash transactions" worth Rs 25 crore for the  the group, and that he was responsible for handling it. 

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”