Skip to main content

'Illegal' public parade, assault of accused by Surat police: Plea to DGP

By A Representative
 
Mujahid Nafees, Convener of the Minority Coordination Committee (MCC), has submitted a representation to the Director General of Police (DGP), Gujarat, alleging that Surat police officers violated Supreme Court guidelines and a Gujarat DGP circular by allegedly assaulting accused persons in public during a police reconstruction exercise.
The complaint relates to an FIR registered at Salabatpura Police Station on July 13, 2026. Referring to media reports and videos circulated on July 14, Nafees alleged that the accused were publicly paraded and physically assaulted by police personnel during the reconstruction of the crime. According to the complaint, the accused belong to the Muslim minority community.
The representation alleges that the public parade, custodial assault, and alleged humiliation of the accused violated constitutional protections, the Supreme Court's landmark D.K. Basu guidelines on custodial safeguards, and a Gujarat DGP circular dated May 12, 2026, which reportedly prohibits the public beating of accused persons.
The complaint further states that the accused were allegedly forced to walk barefoot before a large crowd, beaten with sticks and by hand, had their hair pulled, and were paraded in handcuffs despite not having been convicted by any court of law. It argues that such actions amount to extrajudicial punishment and undermine the rule of law.
Nafees has urged the DGP to initiate departmental, disciplinary, penal, and criminal proceedings against the police personnel responsible for the alleged custodial violence and public parade.
Mujahid Nafees said, "The police have no legal authority to publicly parade or assault accused persons in the name of reconstruction. Every accused is entitled to dignity, due process, and a fair trial until proven guilty. We have requested the DGP to take immediate action against the officers responsible for these alleged violations of Supreme Court guidelines and the Gujarat Police circular."
The complaint warns that if appropriate action is not taken, the complainant will pursue further legal remedies in accordance with the law.
The allegations are based on the complaint submitted by Mujahid Nafees. The Gujarat Police had not publicly responded to the allegations at the time of writing.

Comments

TRENDING

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative   The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.  

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.