Sachchidananda Hirananda Vatsyayan ‘Agyeya’ remains one of the most influential architects of modern Hindi literature, a writer whose creative range extended across poetry, fiction, criticism, travyel writing, diaries, and editorial work. His poetic collections such as “Bhagnadoot”, “Chinta”, “Ityalam”, “Hari Ghas Par Kshan Bhar”, “Bawra Aheri”, “Indradhanush Raude Huye Ye”, “Ari O Karuna Prabhamay”, “Angan Ke Par Dwar”, “Kitni Navon Mein Kitni Bar”, “Kyonki Main Use Janta Hoon”, “Sagar Mudra”, “Pahle Main Sannata Bunta Hoon”, “Mahavriksha Ke Neeche”, and “Nadi Ki Bank Par Chhaya” introduced new imagery, psychological depth, and modern sensibilities into Hindi poetry. His English anthology “Prison Days and Other Poems” expanded his creative reach further. As a fiction writer, he produced memorable collections like “Vipathga”, “Parampara”, “Kothari Ki Baat”, “Sharanarthi”, and “Jaydol”, while his monumental novel “Shekhar: Ek Jeevni” remains a landmark of psychological and philosophical fiction. His later novels “Nadi Ke Dweep” and “Apne Apne Ajnabi” further established his mastery over narrative experimentation. His travelogues “Are Yayavar Rahega Yaad?” and “Ek Boond Sahsa Uchhali”, his memoir “Smriti Lekha”, and his diaries “Bhavanti”, “Antara”, and “Shashwati” reveal the depth of his introspective vision. His ideological prose “Samvatsar”, his play “Uttar Priyadarshi”, and his critical works “Sabrang”, “Trishanku”, “Atmanepada”, “Adhunik Sahitya: Ek Adhunik Paridrishya”, and “Alwal and Adhyatan” reflect his intellectual breadth. As an editor, his anthologies “Tar Saptak”, “Doosra Saptak”, and “Teesra Saptak” transformed the trajectory of Hindi poetry by introducing new voices and new aesthetic directions.
Among all his works, “Asādhya Vīṇā” occupies a unique place. It is one of those rare poems whose reading never truly ends; instead, it begins anew in every cultural and intellectual context. At first glance, it appears to narrate a simple scene: a royal court, a mystical veena, and a seeker named Priyavada. But as the poem unfolds, it becomes clear that this is not a story but an experience, not an experience but a meditation, and not a meditation but a form of poetic consciousness in which art, nature, philosophy, silence, and the human soul’s inner journey merge inseparably. The poem’s significance lies not in its narrative but in the rich possibilities of meaning it opens.
The poem begins with a dramatic announcement: “Priyavada has arrived! The matted-hair one! Dweller of the cave!” In these three forms of address, Agyeya conjures Priyavada’s entire personality. His name suggests sweetness of speech, while “Keshakambali” and “Gufa-geha” reveal his ascetic life. The king welcomes him with humility, declaring, “I am blessed, revered one! You have come. Now I have confidence that the striving of my life will be fulfilled today!” The king’s longing is clear: he wants the unattainable veena to finally speak. This contrast between the king’s desire for achievement and Priyavada’s path of self-transformation becomes one of the poem’s central tensions.
The veena’s history is narrated with reverence. It came from the mountain forests of Uttarakhand, “from the dense forests where ascetics observe their vows.” It was fashioned by Vajrakirti from the ancient Kiriti tree “into whose ears the snow-capped peaks would whisper their secrets, upon whose shoulders clouds would sleep.” The tree sheltered forest herds, housed bears, and offered its bark to lions. Its roots reached the netherworld, where “the serpent Vasuki rested his hood and slept.” Through these images, nature becomes a conscious, living presence. The tree is not described physically but through its relationships—with mountains, clouds, animals, and the underworld. It becomes a cosmic axis, a symbol of vastness and interconnectedness.
Vajrakirti’s creation of the veena was not craftsmanship but tapasya. “From that very Kiriti tree Vajrakirti fashioned it with his entire life: this was the austere discipline of that seeker—the veena was completed, and with it his spiritual striving, and with it the play of his life.” The veena thus carries within it a lifetime of discipline. No artist has been able to master it; skill, knowledge, and pride have all failed. The king hopes that a “swarasiddha”—one who has attained realization through sound—will awaken it.
Priyavada prepares not to perform but to surrender. He spreads his blanket, places the veena upon it, closes his eyes, draws in his breath, bows, and touches the strings “with a touch that was no touch.” He declares, “I am no artist, I am a disciple, a seeker—a witness to the unspoken truths of life.” He remembers Vajrakirti, the Kiriti tree, and the mantra-infused veena, saying, “Merely remembering them is enough to overwhelm one with emotion!” Silence deepens. Priyavada places his forehead upon the strings, surrendering his ego. The assembly wonders whether he is sleeping or defeated, unable to perceive the inner process unfolding.
In that silence, “the silent Priyavada was mastering the veena—no, he was purifying himself.” This correction is crucial. The discipline is not of the veena but of the self. Priyavada surrenders himself to the Kiriti tree, asking, “Who is Priyavada that, in arrogance, he should come before this mantra-infused instrument?” He recognizes that even the thought of mastery would be arrogance. The veena is “a lifetime’s discipline”; how can a moment’s art compete with it?
Priyavada forgets the royal court and enters a mantra-infused solitude in which the Kiriti tree becomes present before him. He begins a silent soliloquy, addressing the tree and awakening within himself the consciousness scattered across nature, memory, and creation. He recalls countless sensations: the sprouting and falling of leaves, monsoons performing arati, fireflies circling, raindrops pattering, mahua dripping, bees humming, birds fluttering, streams gurgling, rocks falling, dawn trembling, and stars quivering at dusk. These memories are not decorative; they are his sadhana. Through them, he dissolves his ego, saying, “I remember—yet I have forgotten myself.”
The veena awakens slowly, “as if stretching lazily.” Then “suddenly the veena rang out.” The sound is “self-born… in which sleeps unbroken the silence of Brahma.” The poem does not describe the music directly; instead, it shows its effects on listeners. Each person hears something different: divine grace, freedom from fear, the clink of gold, the fragrance of grain, the timid anklets of a bride, the gurgling of an infant, the roar of war, the quiet of twilight. Meaning becomes fluid, shaped by the listener’s consciousness.
The king’s crown becomes light “as if it were a siris flower.” His ambition and envy fall away. The queen sees her jewels as “particles of darkness” and discovers the primacy of love. The music transforms without preaching.
When the music ends, Priyavada refuses all praise. “There is no credit that is mine.” What the assembly heard was not his, nor the veena’s. “It was the suchness of everything—the great emptiness—that great silence.” He gathers his blanket and returns to his cave. The assembly disperses. The poem concludes with the quiet yet monumental statement: “The age had turned.”
“Asādhya Vīṇā” engages with the Upanishads, Buddhist philosophy, Advaita, the theory of nada, ecological consciousness, symbolism, structuralism, post-structuralism, reader-response theory, post-humanism, Marxist and feminist perspectives, hermeneutics, and even Taoist narrative origins. Yet it is not reducible to any one tradition. It creates a dialogue with all of them, transforming them into contemporary poetic experience.
In an age driven by achievement, consumption, immediacy, and self-centeredness, Agyeya’s poem offers a radically different vision—one of discipline, listening, surrender, dialogue, and co-existence. It is both a poem of its time and a timeless experience. Its reading never ends; it begins anew each time. It is not merely a poem but a journey into silence, a meditation on art, nature, and the dissolution of the self. It remains one of the most profound creations of modern Hindi literature, a work that continues to resonate across generations, inviting readers into the vast, living silence from which all true music is born.
---
*Professor and former Head (Retd.), Department of Hindi, University of Hyderabad. This is the abridged version of the author's original paper
Comments
Post a Comment
NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor