Skip to main content

GoI response undemocratic, tyrannical: PUCL on 'brutal' crackdown on farmers’ march

Counterview Desk 

India's top civil rights group, People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), even as condemning the Union government seeking to "wage a war" against the farmers, has said, the latest "brutal crackdown" off Delhi highlights the hypocrisy of the Government of India (GoI). While conferring the country’s highest civilian award, Bharat Ratna, to Charan Singh, a "celebrated" farmers’ leader and former Prime Minister and to Dr MS Swaminathan, agricultural scientist, it "deployed violent measures" to prevent the protesters from exercising their democratic rights.
"The tactics adopted by the Union and State Governments raises a fundamental question: does the Union Government consider the protesting farmers as citizens of India or as enemy aliens?", PUCL asked in a statement, underlining, they were only exercising their fundamental right -- demanding "a legal guarantee for Minimum Support Price (MSP), full waiver of farmers’ debts, pensions to farmers, and withdrawal of cases filed in 2020-21 against the protesting farmers."

Text:

The People’s Union for Civil Liberties strongly condemns the Union Government’s repressive measures against the protesting farmers who are exercising their fundamental rights in demanding a legal guarantee for Minimum Support Price (MSP), full waiver of farmers’ debts, pensions to farmers, and withdrawal of cases filed in 2020-21 against the protesting farmers.  
We are appalled by the display of brute force by the BJP-led Union Government and the Haryana Government in dealing with the farmers' protests. The measures include:
(1)  Layers of heavy blockades made up of barbed wires, nails, and huge containers set up at the borders to prevent the farmers from entering the NCR region.
(2)  Section 144  enforced in certain parts of Delhi, and Haryana.
(3)  Makeshift prisons set up at various points to prevent the farmers from carrying on their march.
(4)  Internet shutdowns in several districts of Haryana.
What is even more disturbing is the use of:
(a) Rubber bullets
(b) Long Range Acoustic Devices or Sonic Devices capable of causing hearing  impairments; and
(c) Using drone-based tear-gas launchers developed by the Border Security Force (BSF)
The tactics adopted by the Union and State Governments raises a fundamental question: does the Union Government consider the protesting farmers as citizens of India or as enemy aliens?
Samyukta Kisan Morcha (Non-political), Kisan Mazdoor Morcha (KMM) and the Kisan Mazdoor Sangharsh Committee (KMSC) and many other workers unions had called for and set out on the `Dilli Chalo’ march on 13th February 2024, to condemn the Union government’s failure in upholding the promise given in 2021 following the year-long farmers protest. PUCL would like to point out that the farmers protest in 2020-2021 saw thousands of women and men farmers, workers unions and others participating in the protest braving adverse weather conditions which resulted in the death of over 700 farmers. The Modi-government has failed to comply with the public assurances given to the farmers based on which they had called off the struggle in 2021.  
It should be pointed out that the current actions were decided only after talks between farmers unions and government failed, with the farmer’s unions alleging that the government engaged in talks only as a means to delay and avoid implementation of assurances.   
PUCL strongly denounces the undemocratic, tyrannical response of the Union Government to the farmers’ march. Instead of any substantial attempt to engage in good faith dialogue to address the farmers’ grievances, the State has chosen to use force and repression to suppress their voice. In what should be a matter of terrifying concern and shame to every Indian citizen, it has employed tactics normally used against enemies in wartimes, against its own citizens!  
Reports have been coming in about the effect of the violence with around 200 farmers having been left injured by the highhandedness of the police.
Apart from the strong-arm tactics used, several social media accounts of prominent farmer leaders/unions on X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook were withheld ahead of the Delhi March. The Haryana government had also imposed Internet shutdown and a ban on bulk messaging in seven districts. These prohibitory measures, along with sealing off of the Delhi borders, have been challenged in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.  
The brutal crackdown also highlights the hypocrisy of the Union government. In the same week of conferring the country’s highest civilian award, the Bharat Ratna, to Mr. Charan Singh, a celebrated farmers’ leader and former Prime Minister, and to Dr. MS Swaminathan, an agricultural scientist, the Union government has deployed violent measures to prevent farmers from exercising their democratic rights. The height of irony is that the farmers are demanding the implementation of MS Swaminathan Committee Report, while the government steadfastly refuses to adopt the recommendations which support MSP and other farmer welfare measures.
We wish to point out that instead of recognising the demands of the farmers as a matter of their right to life and livelihood, the state is treating them as criminals and their struggle as a `law and order’ problem to be suppressed.
We believe the actions of the Union Government, Haryana government, and the Delhi Police expose the deep mistrust that the present disposition has against its own citizens, and the functioning of a police-state in the place of democracy.  
Their actions, are in violation of the Article 19(1) (a), (b), and (d), resulting in the trampling of the farmers right to express, assemble peacefully, and move freely between the states of India. These constitutional rights are the heart of any democracy as it is only by the peaceful expression of opinion through public assemblies and marches that change can be brought about. In fact, Babasaheb Ambedkar defined a democracy as ‘a form and a method of government whereby revolutionary changes in the economic and social life of the people are brought about without bloodshed.’ It is this essence, of what makes India a vibrant democracy in the eyes of its founders, that is being shut down before our eyes.
PUCL expresses its solidarity with the protesting farmer unions and organisations, and all the farmers who are asserting their constitutional and fundamental right to expression, movement, and assembly. The protesting farmers are by this very assertion, reclaiming the Indian Constitution for all of us.
-- Kavita Srivastava, President, Dr V Suresh, General Secretary, PUCL

Comments

TRENDING

Whither space for the marginalised in Kerala's privately-driven townships after landslides?

By Ipshita Basu, Sudheesh R.C.  In the early hours of July 30 2024, a landslide in the Wayanad district of Kerala state, India, killed 400 people. The Punjirimattom, Mundakkai, Vellarimala and Chooralmala villages in the Western Ghats mountain range turned into a dystopian rubble of uprooted trees and debris.

Election bells ringing in Nepal: Can ousted premier Oli return to power?

By Nava Thakuria*  Nepal is preparing for a national election necessitated by the collapse of KP Sharma Oli’s government at the height of a Gen Z rebellion (youth uprising) in September 2025. The polls are scheduled for 5 March. The Himalayan nation last conducted a general election in 2022, with the next polls originally due in 2027.  However, following the dissolution of Nepal’s lower house of Parliament last year by President Ram Chandra Poudel, the electoral process began under the patronage of an interim government installed on 12 September under the leadership of retired Supreme Court judge Sushila Karki. The Hindu-majority nation of over 29 million people will witness more than 3,400 electoral candidates, including 390 women, representing 68 political parties as well as independents, vying for 165 seats in the 275-member House of Representatives.

Gig workers hold online strike on republic day; nationwide protests planned on February 3

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers across the country observed a nationwide online strike on Republic Day, responding to a call given by the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) to protest what it described as exploitation, insecurity and denial of basic worker rights in the platform economy. The union said women gig workers led the January 26 action by switching off their work apps as a mark of protest.

India’s road to sustainability: Why alternative fuels matter beyond electric vehicles

By Suyash Gupta*  India’s worsening air quality makes the shift towards clean mobility urgent. However, while electric vehicles (EVs) are central to India’s strategy, they alone cannot address the country’s diverse pollution and energy challenges.

'Condonation of war crimes against women and children’: IPSN on Trump’s Gaza Board

By A Representative   The India-Palestine Solidarity Network (IPSN) has strongly condemned the announcement of a proposed “Board of Peace” for Gaza and Palestine by former US President Donald J. Trump, calling it an initiative that “condones war crimes against children and women” and “rubs salt in Palestinian wounds.”

With infant mortality rate of 5, better than US, guarantee to live is 'alive' in Kerala

By Nabil Abdul Majeed, Nitheesh Narayanan   In 1945, two years prior to India's independence, the current Chief Minister of Kerala, Pinarayi Vijayan, was born into a working-class family in northern Kerala. He was his mother’s fourteenth child; of the thirteen siblings born before him, only two survived. His mother was an agricultural labourer and his father a toddy tapper. They belonged to a downtrodden caste, deemed untouchable under the Indian caste system.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

MGNREGA: How caste and power hollowed out India’s largest welfare law

By Sudhir Katiyar, Mallica Patel*  The sudden dismantling of MGNREGA once again exposes the limits of progressive legislation in the absence of transformation of a casteist, semi-feudal rural society. Over two days in the winter session, the Modi government dismantled one of the most progressive legislations of the UPA regime—the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

Fragmented opposition and identity politics shaping Tamil Nadu’s 2026 election battle

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Tamil Nadu is set to go to the polls in April 2026, and the political battle lines are beginning to take shape. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the state on January 23, 2026, marked the formal launch of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s campaign against the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). Addressing multiple public meetings, the Prime Minister accused the DMK government of corruption, criminality, and dynastic politics, and called for Tamil Nadu to be “freed from DMK’s chains.” PM Modi alleged that the DMK had turned Tamil Nadu into a drug-ridden state and betrayed public trust by governing through what he described as “Corruption, Mafia and Crime,” derisively terming it “CMC rule.” He claimed that despite making numerous promises, the DMK had failed to deliver meaningful development. He also targeted what he described as the party’s dynastic character, arguing that the government functioned primarily for the benefit of a single family a...