If contribution is the concern, why hasn&#39;t top award gone to VP Singh and Kanshiram?

If contribution is the concern, why hasn't top award gone to VP Singh and Kanshiram?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*

Bharat Ratna awards to late prime ministers PV Narsimha Rao, Chaudhury Charan Singh and MS Swaminathan has been welcomed by all. I have always stood against the state award sponsorship, as it basically means that your work is 'liked' and 'appreciated' by the top leadership.

Awards have always been political. Congress gave Rajiv Gandhi, MG Ramchandran, Lata Mangeshkar and Sachin Tendulkar these awards. In 1977, when Moraji Desai-led Janata government took over, they abolished all these awards given by the state, including Padma Awards. When Indira Gandhi returned to power in 1980, she initiated them again, but it is a fact that most of the time these awards have been controlled by the ruling party.

There is a commonality in the choices of these awards. Karpoori Thakur and PV Narsimha Rao are known for their relationship with saffron forces. Charan Singh actully walked out of the Janata government, when he was Deputy Prime Minister, and later formed the government with the support of Indira Gandhi. In fact, many felt that it was Charan Singh and his ambitions which resulted in the fall of Janta government.

Charan Singh ensured that Indira Gandhi was jailed and humiliated, as all the court cases and commissions did not yield anything politically except that he became prime minister and has the record of not facing the parliament.

Narsimha Rao's relationship with top leaders of BJP and RSS was well known. He did not act to stop the Babri demolition and was all the time manipulating things to keep the Gandhis out of the power politics. That apart, Rao opened up India's door, hailed as father of economic reforms, but it can be safely said that his acts demolished Congress and its socialist tag. Under Indira Gandhi, Congress worked to bring parity in the lives of SC-ST-minorities but Rao killed everything in the post Mandal identity politics. If Congress is completely decimated in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, the credit goes to Narsimha Rao.

Karpuri Thakur's relationship with Jan Sangh is well known. He formed government with them and was needed by Jan Sangh in the same way as Nitish is needw BJP. The upper caste BJP can't take on the might of Lalu Yadav and hence they needed this Maha Dalit and Ati Pichhda game. Nitish knew it well that on his own, he would never be able to do that and hence, despite 9 terms, it is not the hunger of Nitish kumar to be in power but never allow Lalu family to have political domain in Bihar. The upper caste rule can only be ensured if there are divisions in the OBCs. Unfortunately, the role of powerful OBC leaders in denying a space to Karpoori Thakur resulted in his association with the RSS and BJP.

MS Swaminathan is overhyped for so called MSPs. Kisan's' issues are not MSPs alone. His theory would only help the power elite of the farmers and ultimately pave the way for the industrialization of the farm sector.

If you have read Charan Singh and his thesis, you will realise it is nothing about farming but more to protect the interest of his community. In his book on Zamindari Abolition, Charan Singh's entire focus is on demolishing the USSR model of Collective farms. He gives American, British, French and German examples but I have not read words of sympathy from Charan Singh for the Dalits, landless farmers. How is that Charan Singh not aware of the Punjab act. He speak against 'absentee landlords' but does not want government to follow the Russian model but prove that American model is far better where big investors work on land. Actually, Zamindari Abolition was linked to make Rajput land owners feel guilty but at the same time it was never advocated and acted in Punjab and western Uttar Pradesh.

Karpoori Thakur promoted Lohia's anti-English sentiments. Do we want our children to not study English language? Uttar Pradesh and Bihar have paid a price for English not being promoted. Mulayam Singh Yadav, Karpoori Thakur all were the followers of Charan Singh who was against technology in the farm sector. Kisan's should not use tractor he has written emphatically. The farmers in Western Uttar Pradesh are among the most prosperous because they embraced technology.

Actually, this is the age of identity and not ideas. Market driven ideas assimilate the identity and promote their ideas through selling the identity of even those who have been diametrically opposed to it. Hence, it is not important what are the ideologies of individuals as well as their acts but their jaatis. So the farmers should now forget everything and feel good as Charan Singh and Swaminathan have got the Bharat Ratna, Telugus should feel great about Narsimharao getting the award. OBCs should not seek representation in jobs, and see what has been done to them, but must feel happy that all their issues are resolved.

If some one ask me a question, I would say, give Bharat Ratna to Babu Jagdev Prasad Kushawah as he spoke for the land rights of the dalits and OBCs. If work for the people is concern, why the Award is not given to VP Singh and Kanshiram. They deserve is better than any one else but definitely they will also get one day when the ruling party feel that the awards can help them reap political benefit. At the moment, I dont see it happen because the work of VP Singh as well as Kanshiram jolted the ruling elites and they still fear and resent their impact.

Anyway, Bharat Ranta mubarak to all the family members of the awardees. Now they can safely ask questions to Gandhi family and join the ruling party bandwagon for a 'better' future.

---

*Human rights defender

Comments

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857 By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

Spirit of leadership vs bondage: Of empowered chairman of 100-acre social forestry coop

By Gagan Sethi* This is about Khoda Sava, a young Dalit belonging to the Vankar sub-caste, who worked as a bonded labourer in a village near Vadgam in Banskantha district of North Gujarat. The year was 1982. Khoda had taken a loan of Rs 7,000 from the village sarpanch, a powerful landlord doing money-lending as his side business. Khoda, who had taken the loan for marriage, was landless. Normally, villagers would mortgage their land if they took loan from the sarpanch. But Khoda had no land. He had no option but to enter into a bondage agreement with the sarpanch in order to repay the loan. Working in bondage on the sarpanch’s field meant that he would be paid Rs 1,200 per annum, from which his loan amount with interest would be deducted. He was also obliged not to leave the sarpanch’s field and work as daily wager somewhere else. At the same time, Khoda was offered meal once a day, and his wife job as agricultural worker on a “priority basis”. That year, I was working as secretary...

Fate of Yamuna floodplain still hangs in "balance" despite National Green Tribunal rap on Sri Sri event

By Ashok Shrimali* While the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Thursday reportedly pulled up the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for granting permission to hold spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's World Culture Festival on the banks of Yamuna, the chief petitioners against the high-profile event Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan has declared, the “fate of the floodplain still hangs in balance.”

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

Proposed Modi yatra from Jharkhand an 'insult' of Adivasi hero Birsa Munda: JMM

Counterview Desk The civil rights network, Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha (JMM), which claims to have 30 grassroots groups under its wings, has decided to launch Save Democracy campaign to oppose Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vikasit Bharat Sankalp Yatra to be launched on November 15 from the village of legendary 19th century tribal independence leader Birsa Munda from Ulihatu (Khunti district).

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman* Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Counterview

Search This Blog