Skip to main content

INDIA alliance leaders should suppress individual predilections, regional ambitions

By Salman Khursheed* 
The INDIA  Alliance soldiers on despite some predictable as well as unpredictable developments that slow us down. But the magic moment will certainly come when all of us will suppress our individual predilections and territorial ambitions to create an invincible reformative force in contemporary politics. There is no choice but to take up cudgels for freedom and democracy, both in deep peril.  If we are remiss today there will be no tomorrow for redemption. 
It is an undeniable fact that the Alliance partners have been accustomed to varying political life styles, even sought to grow at each other’s expense. But the collective cost of our failure to unite will be humongous, even unimagined. On the other hand the excitement of marching shoulder to shoulder with partners whose history has been adversarial or at best, aloof, along with the chance of turning a new page in India’s contemporary politics, will stand out as a historical moment. We may still jostle for specific seats but once that is over there will only be winners amongst us all the way to Sansad Bhavan.
There is speculation that the Pran Prathishta at Ayodhya has already sealed the verdict of 2024. But even as we all join the celebration of the installation of Balak Ram, not all citizens, including the faithful of Sanatan Dharma, necessarily believe that 2024 is about god versus humans. The realm of the spirit and the world of human existence are separate and will remain so no matter how some people choose to describe it. Electoral politics, not spiritual faith will ultimately decide how our public institutions and public life is to be conducted, with perhaps spirituality urging us towards ethics and humanism.  
All societies aspire to a perfect system and Ram Rajya is the ideal of Indian civilisation. But that is not synonymous with uniformity or UCC. India’s plurality offers similar aspirations with different description or conceptions of the concept that forms the basis of Ram Rajya. Islam uses the term Nizam-e-Mustafa. Our effort should be to find equivalence and convergence. Hindu beliefs and Astha were respected by all much before the consecration of Ram Balak and will continue for all times to come. But it is important that it be seen as honest and sincere respect for the majority religion, not surrender to the inevitable working of our system of governance. India must project the persona of Lord Ram as unifier and embraces of entire humanity, not as an object of contention, real or imagined. Whilst persons of different religious faiths of India have their respective beliefs and objects of worship, there is no reason to seek dominance over persons of other faiths. There is enough space in India for all Indians and their revered objects of belief. It is of course true that vicissitudes of history have caused very limited, perhaps temporary aberrations  in our harmonious collective existence. Time and effort, not to speak of institutional intervention have resolved many such controversies though some have defied satisfactory solutions. 
I have no reservation in saying publicly that Bhagwan Ram is paramount in our civilisational perception and all members of Sanatan Dharma deserve to be congratulated for the great event. But equality Islamic civilisation and the iman of the ummah contributes to the wholesome unified picture of secular India. Perhaps all Hindus and Muslims alike will find the moment to demonstrate their solidarity and resonance for Muslim brothers and sisters faith. The real triumph for our society will be in honestly believing in the goodness of all religions. Of course there are people who look for power in religious symbols rather than persuasion; over the centuries this has often led to conflict and confrontation. Democratic India has to abjure such tendencies and underscore Sufi as well as Bhakti spirituality that capture the most humane of religious thought and practices. Mahatma Gandhi’s bhajan Raghupati Raghav Raja Ram…..Ishwar Allah tero naam, conveys that message. 
The political hyperbole marshalled by the BJP to mix politics with religion as indeed the symbolism attached to the Hindutva version of the Hindu way of life, will not overwhelm the constitutional morality of liberal India. The right to autonomous existence without the State taking sides for particular groups, subscribing to equal concern and respect for all will and indeed, must prevail for our sustainable future. The test is not about one region prevailing over others but the respect to varying perceptions within religions. Public mood is fickle and constantly changing. We would not have travelled so far on the road of unity in diversity if uniformity had a lasting impact on Indian society. The principles our founding fathers handed to us need to be preserved and protected against the illusion of numbers. This conviction can be sourced in Ram Rajya if we take the message of Lord Ram to its logical conclusion. That this matters is reflected in the iteration of sab ka saath, sab ka Vikas, sab ka vishvas. It remains for actions to follow the words.
---
*Former Union foreign minister, Congress leader, senior Supreme Court advocate 

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson". 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.