Skip to main content

Why Modi isn't advising ‘It's not the time for war’ to Netanyahu like he did to Putin?

By Venkatesh Narayanan, Sandeep Pandey* 
After having pounded Gaza for over three months killing more than 26,000 Palestinians, during the course of which Israel also attacked Children’s hospitals and refugee camps in West Bank, on the pretext of flushing out Hamas fighters from there, Israel, with the help of its western allies, is doing the most unthinkable thing – trying to stop the humanitarian help to the beleaguered citizens of Gaza reaching through United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.
If in the opinion of International Court of Justice what is happening in Gaza is not genocide yet - it merely said that Israel’s conduct in the Gaza war risked acts of genocide - then this effort of Israel would certainly convince the world that indeed Israel is committing genocide by preventing food and medical aid reach the hapless Gazans.
During the ICJ hearing, Israel's Prime Minister - Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been almost universally reviled globally and within Israel, reiterated that Israel would continue to bomb Gaza regardless of the ICJ verdict, or ongoing global outrage at his genocidal military campaign. He reiterated the "No one will stop us, not The Hague, not the axis of evil and not anyone else".
To clarify to the confused billions, the "Axis of Evil" he was referring to was not Israel, the US, UK, and the western governments but the international community’s near universal condemnation of and pressure to end the Israel’s crimes in Gaza.Netanyahu furthered claimed that he would continue the heinous massacres till the population of Gaza thinned out to about 200,000 from its current 2.2 Million: Netanyahu’s Goal for Gaza: “Thin” Population “to a Minimum”.
South Africa’s courageous decision to take Israel to the Hague has given a legal forum for the international advocacy for a ceasefire, and beyond that, advocacy to end the ongoing Nakba, Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians since 1948. Both South Africa and Israel are signatories to the 1948 Genocide Convention which gives the ICJ the jurisdiction to rule on disputes over the treaty.
Ironically, the Genocide Convention was the first human rights treaty adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 9 December 1948 and signified the international community's commitment to prevent the atrocities committed against Jews in the Holocaust from repeating - for any group - under the rallying cry of “never again”. Israel has ratified the convention.
Israel thumbs its nose at this convention, perpetrating the same crime committed against the very people in whose name it now claims to act. Jewish groups like JVP and Rabbis for Ceasefire have vocally protested against Israel, insisting that never again means never again for anyone and that genocide will not be committed in their name.
At least a dozen countries backed the South African legal team - Belgium, Maldives, Namibia, Bolivia, Turkey, Jordan, Malaysia, Pakistan Columbia, Bangladesh, Brazil, and more than 50 countries of the OIC and the Arab League. The Indian government -- probably wary of its participative background of pogroms in Gujarat and its occupation of Kashmir -- stayed noncommittal on the sidelines. A shameful episode which many of us noticed.
The ICJ has ruled that Israel must take all possible measures to prevent acts as outlined in Article 2 of the 1948 Genocide Convention. This entails not killing Palestinians, not causing physical or psychological harm to them, not inflicting living conditions which will be fatal, etc. Israeli military has been told to desist from such actions. Israel is to ensure delivery of basic services and essential humanitrian aid to civilians in Gaza.
Within a month Israel has been asked to submit a compliance report. United States has seen this as a vindication of its decision to support Israel’s right of self-defense in wake of the 7 October, 2023 attack by Hamas on Israel. But the side which has been defending before, since 1947, and after 7 October is mostly Palestine, not Israel which has been on the offensive more often than not.
Purchases of surveillance software from Israel and Adani's business interests in Haifa port make India's position morally indefensible
ICJ ruling is an opportunity for the Israeli Government to see what it is doing it nothing short of genocide, 75 years of apartheid and ethnic cleansing, and it must use the ICJ judgement to put an end to the atrocities it has been committing on Palestinians. 
Israeli government has used horrific munitions such as white phosphorus and starvation by preventing aid from reaching Gazans through the Rafah border making it a war criminal under the Geneva convention. It should not make the matters worse by now targeting UNRWA and choking whatever little is reaching Gaza in the form of relief and medical aid.
Role of Indian government now, after taking a clear cut position against Israel since its creation in 1947 to about four decades, is equally condemnable for being complicit in this genocide -- silent against the acts of Israel, refusing to vocally call out Israel's actions. India is conspicuous by its absence among the countries supporting South Africa in ICJ.
Narendra Modi has not offered the ‘it is not the time for war’ advice to Benjamin Netanyahu that he had for Vladimir Putin when Russia attacked Ukraine. The Indian people are aware of the Home Minister Amit Shah's purchases of surveillance software products such as Pegasus and Predator from Israel, and its oligarchic backer Adani's business interests in Haifa port. That makes India's position morally indefensible.
There is a need to stand with the Palestinian people, the people of Gaza and the resistance against its occupiers -- according to UN Resolution 2625 of 1970, Resolution 3314 of the UNGA, and UNGA resolution 37/43, Palestinians have the right to armed resistance. Israel as an occupying force has no right to self-defense. 
Israel can only be condemned in the harshest possible terms and India for reversing its long standing support for Palestine and not standing up on the right side of history.
---
*Venkatesh Narayanan is a self-employed professional; Sandeep Pandey is General Secretary of Socialist Party (India), who recently returned his Magsaysay Award and degrees from U.S. universities in opposition to U.S. support of Israel in its onslaught on Gaza

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Grueling summer ahead: Cuttack’s alarming health trends and what they mean for Odisha

By Sudhansu R Das  The preparation to face the summer should begin early in Odisha. People in the state endure long, grueling summer months starting from mid-February and extending until the end of October. This prolonged heat adversely affects productivity, causes deaths and diseases, and impacts agriculture, tourism and the unorganized sector. The social, economic and cultural life of the state remains severely disrupted during the peak heat months.
Post a Comment
»

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.
Post a Comment
»

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra   There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.
Post a Comment
»

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.
Post a Comment
»

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.
Post a Comment
»

The cost of being Indian: How inequality and market logic redefine rights

By Vikas Gupta   We, the people of India, are engaged in a daily tryst—read: struggle—for basic human rights. For the seemingly well-to-do, the wish list includes constant water supply, clean air, safe roads, punctual public transportation, and crime-free neighbourhoods. For those further down the ladder, the struggle is starker: food that fills the stomach, water that doesn’t sicken, medicines that don’t kill, houses that don’t flood, habitats at safe distances from polluted streams or garbage piles, and exploitation-free environments in the public institutions they are compelled to navigate.
Post a Comment
»

Why India must urgently strengthen its policies for an ageing population

By Bharat Dogra   A quiet but far-reaching demographic transformation is reshaping much of the world. As life expectancy rises and birth rates fall, societies are witnessing a rapid increase in the proportion of older people. This shift has profound implications for public policy, and the need to strengthen frameworks for healthy and secure ageing has never been more urgent. India is among the countries where these pressures will intensify most sharply in the coming decades.
Post a Comment
»

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor*  Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.
Post a Comment
»

Proposals for Babri Masjid, Ram Temple spark fears of polarisation before West Bengal polls

By A Representative   A political debate has emerged in West Bengal following recent announcements about plans for new religious structures in Murshidabad district, including a proposed mosque to be named Babri Masjid and a separate announcement by a BJP leader regarding the construction of a Ram temple in another location within Behrampur.
Post a Comment
»