Skip to main content

Electoral bonds 'likely to be sold' ahead of Lok Sabha polls: Will Supreme Court act?

By Rosamma Thomas*

Under clause 8 of the Electoral Bond Scheme, 2018, bonds can be issued for 10 days each in January, April, July and October, and an additional 30 days in the year of a general election. With general elections 2024 just months away, the 30-day period of issuance of bonds might be invoked again, even though the whole scheme has been challenged in the Supreme Court.
On November 02, 2023, the SC hearing in the matter was completed and the judgment was reserved. In its order of November 2, 2023, the SC directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) that: “In any event, we now direct that the Election Commission shall produce up-to-date data until 30 September 2023 in terms of the interim directions which were issued on 12 April 2019. The exercise shall be carried out on or before 19 November 2023. The data in sealed packet shall be handed over to the Registrar (judicial) of this court.”
Transparency activist Commodore Lokesh Batra filed an RTI with the Public Information Officer (PIO) of the ECI in the third week of November 2023, requesting copies of the complete set of documents including notings in the file(s)/folders on which Commission (EC) had processed the directions of the SC order of November 2, 2023.
Commodore Batra brought to the notice of the PIO that he had filed a similar RTI request even after the SC order of April 12, 2019, and had been provided complete file documents including a list of 105 political parties which provided details of electoral bonds in sealed cover to the EC. Batra attached that list with his current RTI application, adding that in October 2023 the State Bank of India, in response to an RTI application, had said that only 25 political parties had opened accounts for the purpose of encashing these bonds.
Commodore Batra mentioned that as per the existing Electoral Bond Scheme, each Electoral Bond (EB) is a promissory note (akin to currency note) -- hence the SBI would have details of EBs buyers/donors as per their KYC (Know Your Customer protocol). 
SBI would also have details of ‘political party account’ in which the said EB is redeemed, because each Electoral Bond (EB) has a hidden number verified by the SBI’s authorized branch before redemption in a political party’s ‘specific account’, which is opened for the purpose of redeeming electoral bonds. Legally, the political party would not know the name of the donor based solely on the anonymous promissory note termed ‘electoral bond’ it received.
Like in 2019, Commodore Batra sought the ‘List of Political Parties’ which had submitted EB details to ECI in sealed covers, in compliance with the letter from the Election Commission dated November 3, 2023.
In his response, on December 18, 2023, Binod Kumar, the public information officer of the Election Commission, denied information under the Section-8(1)(b) of the RTI Act.
It is noteworthy the Section-8(1)(b) of the act mentions “information which has been expressly forbidden to be published by any court of law or tribunal or the disclosure of which may constitute contempt of court.”
Commodore Batra filed an appeal against this denial of information, arguing that the Supreme Court had not forbidden publication of the information. Commodore Batra pointed out that the PIO had also failed to offer a cogent reason for denying the information. While the PIO under section 7(1) of the RTI Act, 2005 quoted Section-8(1)(b) for denial of information, he had failed to provide justification for arriving at the reason for denial, as envisaged under the Section 7(8)(i) of the RTI Act, 2005.
Speaking with this reporter, Commodore Batra noted that two days after the SC reserved judgment, on November 4, 2023, the government announced 15 days of sale of Electoral Bonds from November 6-20, 2023. Electoral bonds were sold again for 10 days in January 2024. 
Though the apex court directed the ECI to produce up-to-date data until September 30, 2023 in terms of the interim directions issued on April 12, 2019, it is to be noted that the bonds have been sold already for a period of 45 days after September 30, 2023. (10 days in October, 15 days in November 2023 and 10 days in January 2014).
The Electoral Bond scheme is problematic for several reasons, with the potential to kill democracy by offering undue advantage to the party in power – between March 2018 and September 2023, the bonds were sold in 30 phases. 
The vast majority of the bonds sold are in the denomination of Rs 1 crore each – clearly, these bonds are becoming the major source of electoral funding, and are being purchased by the very rich, or corporate players, rather than the average Indian. Only 0.0001% of the bonds were in the denomination of Rs 1,000. The vast majority of these bonds (57%) also go to the party in power.
In response to a question in the Lok Sabha, on February 5, 2024, Pankaj Chaudhary, Union Minister of State for Finance answered that Electoral Bonds worth Rs16,518 crore had so far been purchased from the State Bank of India. The government had paid SBI Rs 8.57 crore as commission, and Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Limited had received Rs 1.90 crore – the ordinary Indian bears this expense that the government shoulders.
In his response, the Union minister explained that the objective of the scheme is to ensure that “clean, tax paid money is coming into the system of political funding through proper banking channel.” 
However, as has been speculated, since the bonds are anonymous, it is possible for them to change hands several times before being submitted to a political party for encashment – who can guarantee that black money is not turned white through this scheme, as a man holding a bond of Rs 1 crore value could sell it to someone else at, say, Rs 1.2 crore, in exchange for the favour of turning Rs 20 lakh of black money white?
Also, the Department of Economic Affairs has referred to correspondence showing that 18% GST is charged on the bonds, but reimbursed by the government to SBI; what this means is that the burden is borne entirely by the Indian citizen.
The Electoral Bond scheme was introduced through amendments to law that lifted restrictions on the amount of donations that private firms could make; Election Commission, in a letter to the Ministry of Law and Justice in 2017, underlined that the proposal to lift the limit on donations from companies “opens up the possibility of shell companies being set up for the sole purpose of making donations”. 
Firms no longer need to declare which party they are contributing to; transparency in fund-raising by political parties is compromised as no reporting of contributions received is expected from the political parties. Donations can also be received from foreign companies having majority stake in Indian firms, which “could lead to Indian policies being influenced by foreign companies.”
If the Supreme Court does not rule in this matter with some urgency, the Centre may declare another round of 30-day issuance of the bond, in different phases, ahead of general elections 2024.
---
*Senior journalist

Comments

SAMIR SARDANA said…
THE KAHUNA IN THE EB SCHEME IS NOT THE CHANGES TO THE COMPANIES ACT – IT IS THE “BEARER BONDS”.WHY NOT DIGITAL DEMAT BONDS WITH CDSL – IN THE AGE OF DIGITAL INDIA,WHICH LANDED ON THE MOON ?


THE EB SCHEME PROVES THAT THE INDIAN BUREAUCRATS AND NETAS,CAN PASS LAWS WHICH NOT ONLY VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION, BUT ARE AGAINST BASIC CANONS OF MORALITY AND ETHICS,AND PROMOTE MONEY LAUNDERING AND CORRUPTION.IN OTHER WORDS,THE ENTIRE ARCHITECTURE IS CORRUPTED AND HAS A PRICE,AND COUNTS FOR NOTHING, AS DECISIONS ARE MADE BY A FEW, and every one in the Indian State has a price !

CASE 1

A NON-TAX EXEMPTED TRUST BUYS BONDS WORTH 100 CRORES,AND TRANSFERS IT TO POLITICAL PARTY X
THE TRUST HAS A BALANCE SHEET OF 120 CRORES AND BANK FUNDS OF 100 CRORES,DULY AUDITED.

PERSON “ZEE” PAYS 120 CRORES IN CASH TO TRUSTEES OF EXEMPTED TRUST.TRUSTEES HAVE FOR A FEE OF RS 20 CRORES,BOOKED A
DONATION OF RS 100 CRORES WHICH IS NOW A TAX ASSESSED LOSS

PERSON ZEE IS A BROKER,DRUG DEALER,PIMP, ARMS DEALER ETC.

THE TRUST WILL BRING IN THE CASH OF 100 CRORES INTO THE TRUST AT 15% PER ANNUM AS FEES,DONATIONS,RENTS, ADVERTISEMENTS ETC. AND OFFSET THE INCOME WITH THE TAX LOSS OF DONATION PAID

IS THIS IN NATIONAL INTEREST

CASE 2

A TAX EXEMPTED TRUST BUYS BONDS WORTH 100 CRORES AND TRANSFERS IT TO POLITICAL PARTY X
THE TRUST HAS A BALANCE SHEET OF 1200 CRORES AND BANK FUNDS OF 1000 CRORES,DULY AUDITED.

PERSON “ZEE” PAYS 120 CRORES IN CASH TO TRUSTEES OF EXEMPTED TRUST.TRUSTEES HAVE FOR A FEE OF RS 20 CRORES,BOOKED A
DONATION OF RS 100 CRORES

PERSON ZEE IS A BROKER,DRUG DEALER,PIMP, ARMS DEALER ETC.

THE TRUST WILL BRING IN THE CASH OF 100 CRORES INTO THE TRUST AT 35% PER ANNUM AS DONATIONS FOR GYANVAPI TEMPLE AS THE TRUST IS A TEMPLE OR WILL BOOK CASH DONATIONS RECEIVED,TO PROPAGATE HINDOO EVIL FILTH

IS THIS IN NATIONAL INTEREST

CASE 3

A TRUST BUYS ELECTORAL BEARER BONDS WORTH 100 CRORES FROM A PERSON, S, AT A 102 CRORES. SO THE TRUST IS OUT OF THE KYC TRAP OF SBI AND SBI HAS NO RECORD OF THE BOND

THE TRUST HAS A BALANCE SHEET OF 1200 CRORES AND BANK FUNDS OF 1000 CRORES,DULY AUDITED.

THE TRUST TRANSFERS IT TO POLITICAL PARTY X

PERSON “ZEE” PAYS 120 CRORES IN CASH TO TRUSTEES OF EXEMPTED TRUST.TRUSTEES HAVE FOR A FEE OF RS 18 CRORES,BOOKED A
DONATION OF RS 100 CRORES

PERSON ZEE IS A BROKER,DRUG DEALER,PIMP, ARMS DEALER ETC.

THE TRUST WILL BRING IN THE CASH OF 100 CRORES INTO THE TRUST VIA AS MANY WAYS AS IT FEELS

OR

THE TRUST WILL DO “ENTRIES OF INCOME” WHERE IT BOOK INCOME AS RENTS ETC, FROM PARTY D OF SAY 100 CRORES,AND THE TRUST WILL BE PAID
A 10% PREMIUM,AS THE TRUST IS TAKING IN INCOME WHICH IT WILL OFFSET WITH THE DONATION TAX LOSS,AND “D” WIL CLAIM A 30% TAX SET OFF
ON THE RENT SO BOOKED

OR

THE TRUST WILL DO “ENTRIES OF INCOME” WHERE IT BOOK INCOME AS DONATIONS RECEIVED ETC, FROM PARTY D OF SAY 10 CRORES,AND THE TRUST WILL PAY “D” A 3-5 % PREMIUM,IN CASH,WHICH IS PAID FROM THE CASH PAID BY “ZEE”ABOVE.THE PERSON “D” WILL GET A TAX OFFSET ON THE DONATION PAID

IS THIS IN NATIONAL INTEREST,dindooohindoo

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.