Skip to main content

Electoral bonds 'likely to be sold' ahead of Lok Sabha polls: Will Supreme Court act?

By Rosamma Thomas*

Under clause 8 of the Electoral Bond Scheme, 2018, bonds can be issued for 10 days each in January, April, July and October, and an additional 30 days in the year of a general election. With general elections 2024 just months away, the 30-day period of issuance of bonds might be invoked again, even though the whole scheme has been challenged in the Supreme Court.
On November 02, 2023, the SC hearing in the matter was completed and the judgment was reserved. In its order of November 2, 2023, the SC directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) that: “In any event, we now direct that the Election Commission shall produce up-to-date data until 30 September 2023 in terms of the interim directions which were issued on 12 April 2019. The exercise shall be carried out on or before 19 November 2023. The data in sealed packet shall be handed over to the Registrar (judicial) of this court.”
Transparency activist Commodore Lokesh Batra filed an RTI with the Public Information Officer (PIO) of the ECI in the third week of November 2023, requesting copies of the complete set of documents including notings in the file(s)/folders on which Commission (EC) had processed the directions of the SC order of November 2, 2023.
Commodore Batra brought to the notice of the PIO that he had filed a similar RTI request even after the SC order of April 12, 2019, and had been provided complete file documents including a list of 105 political parties which provided details of electoral bonds in sealed cover to the EC. Batra attached that list with his current RTI application, adding that in October 2023 the State Bank of India, in response to an RTI application, had said that only 25 political parties had opened accounts for the purpose of encashing these bonds.
Commodore Batra mentioned that as per the existing Electoral Bond Scheme, each Electoral Bond (EB) is a promissory note (akin to currency note) -- hence the SBI would have details of EBs buyers/donors as per their KYC (Know Your Customer protocol). 
SBI would also have details of ‘political party account’ in which the said EB is redeemed, because each Electoral Bond (EB) has a hidden number verified by the SBI’s authorized branch before redemption in a political party’s ‘specific account’, which is opened for the purpose of redeeming electoral bonds. Legally, the political party would not know the name of the donor based solely on the anonymous promissory note termed ‘electoral bond’ it received.
Like in 2019, Commodore Batra sought the ‘List of Political Parties’ which had submitted EB details to ECI in sealed covers, in compliance with the letter from the Election Commission dated November 3, 2023.
In his response, on December 18, 2023, Binod Kumar, the public information officer of the Election Commission, denied information under the Section-8(1)(b) of the RTI Act.
It is noteworthy the Section-8(1)(b) of the act mentions “information which has been expressly forbidden to be published by any court of law or tribunal or the disclosure of which may constitute contempt of court.”
Commodore Batra filed an appeal against this denial of information, arguing that the Supreme Court had not forbidden publication of the information. Commodore Batra pointed out that the PIO had also failed to offer a cogent reason for denying the information. While the PIO under section 7(1) of the RTI Act, 2005 quoted Section-8(1)(b) for denial of information, he had failed to provide justification for arriving at the reason for denial, as envisaged under the Section 7(8)(i) of the RTI Act, 2005.
Speaking with this reporter, Commodore Batra noted that two days after the SC reserved judgment, on November 4, 2023, the government announced 15 days of sale of Electoral Bonds from November 6-20, 2023. Electoral bonds were sold again for 10 days in January 2024. 
Though the apex court directed the ECI to produce up-to-date data until September 30, 2023 in terms of the interim directions issued on April 12, 2019, it is to be noted that the bonds have been sold already for a period of 45 days after September 30, 2023. (10 days in October, 15 days in November 2023 and 10 days in January 2014).
The Electoral Bond scheme is problematic for several reasons, with the potential to kill democracy by offering undue advantage to the party in power – between March 2018 and September 2023, the bonds were sold in 30 phases. 
The vast majority of the bonds sold are in the denomination of Rs 1 crore each – clearly, these bonds are becoming the major source of electoral funding, and are being purchased by the very rich, or corporate players, rather than the average Indian. Only 0.0001% of the bonds were in the denomination of Rs 1,000. The vast majority of these bonds (57%) also go to the party in power.
In response to a question in the Lok Sabha, on February 5, 2024, Pankaj Chaudhary, Union Minister of State for Finance answered that Electoral Bonds worth Rs16,518 crore had so far been purchased from the State Bank of India. The government had paid SBI Rs 8.57 crore as commission, and Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Limited had received Rs 1.90 crore – the ordinary Indian bears this expense that the government shoulders.
In his response, the Union minister explained that the objective of the scheme is to ensure that “clean, tax paid money is coming into the system of political funding through proper banking channel.” 
However, as has been speculated, since the bonds are anonymous, it is possible for them to change hands several times before being submitted to a political party for encashment – who can guarantee that black money is not turned white through this scheme, as a man holding a bond of Rs 1 crore value could sell it to someone else at, say, Rs 1.2 crore, in exchange for the favour of turning Rs 20 lakh of black money white?
Also, the Department of Economic Affairs has referred to correspondence showing that 18% GST is charged on the bonds, but reimbursed by the government to SBI; what this means is that the burden is borne entirely by the Indian citizen.
The Electoral Bond scheme was introduced through amendments to law that lifted restrictions on the amount of donations that private firms could make; Election Commission, in a letter to the Ministry of Law and Justice in 2017, underlined that the proposal to lift the limit on donations from companies “opens up the possibility of shell companies being set up for the sole purpose of making donations”. 
Firms no longer need to declare which party they are contributing to; transparency in fund-raising by political parties is compromised as no reporting of contributions received is expected from the political parties. Donations can also be received from foreign companies having majority stake in Indian firms, which “could lead to Indian policies being influenced by foreign companies.”
If the Supreme Court does not rule in this matter with some urgency, the Centre may declare another round of 30-day issuance of the bond, in different phases, ahead of general elections 2024.
---
*Senior journalist

Comments

SAMIR SARDANA said…
THE KAHUNA IN THE EB SCHEME IS NOT THE CHANGES TO THE COMPANIES ACT – IT IS THE “BEARER BONDS”.WHY NOT DIGITAL DEMAT BONDS WITH CDSL – IN THE AGE OF DIGITAL INDIA,WHICH LANDED ON THE MOON ?


THE EB SCHEME PROVES THAT THE INDIAN BUREAUCRATS AND NETAS,CAN PASS LAWS WHICH NOT ONLY VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION, BUT ARE AGAINST BASIC CANONS OF MORALITY AND ETHICS,AND PROMOTE MONEY LAUNDERING AND CORRUPTION.IN OTHER WORDS,THE ENTIRE ARCHITECTURE IS CORRUPTED AND HAS A PRICE,AND COUNTS FOR NOTHING, AS DECISIONS ARE MADE BY A FEW, and every one in the Indian State has a price !

CASE 1

A NON-TAX EXEMPTED TRUST BUYS BONDS WORTH 100 CRORES,AND TRANSFERS IT TO POLITICAL PARTY X
THE TRUST HAS A BALANCE SHEET OF 120 CRORES AND BANK FUNDS OF 100 CRORES,DULY AUDITED.

PERSON “ZEE” PAYS 120 CRORES IN CASH TO TRUSTEES OF EXEMPTED TRUST.TRUSTEES HAVE FOR A FEE OF RS 20 CRORES,BOOKED A
DONATION OF RS 100 CRORES WHICH IS NOW A TAX ASSESSED LOSS

PERSON ZEE IS A BROKER,DRUG DEALER,PIMP, ARMS DEALER ETC.

THE TRUST WILL BRING IN THE CASH OF 100 CRORES INTO THE TRUST AT 15% PER ANNUM AS FEES,DONATIONS,RENTS, ADVERTISEMENTS ETC. AND OFFSET THE INCOME WITH THE TAX LOSS OF DONATION PAID

IS THIS IN NATIONAL INTEREST

CASE 2

A TAX EXEMPTED TRUST BUYS BONDS WORTH 100 CRORES AND TRANSFERS IT TO POLITICAL PARTY X
THE TRUST HAS A BALANCE SHEET OF 1200 CRORES AND BANK FUNDS OF 1000 CRORES,DULY AUDITED.

PERSON “ZEE” PAYS 120 CRORES IN CASH TO TRUSTEES OF EXEMPTED TRUST.TRUSTEES HAVE FOR A FEE OF RS 20 CRORES,BOOKED A
DONATION OF RS 100 CRORES

PERSON ZEE IS A BROKER,DRUG DEALER,PIMP, ARMS DEALER ETC.

THE TRUST WILL BRING IN THE CASH OF 100 CRORES INTO THE TRUST AT 35% PER ANNUM AS DONATIONS FOR GYANVAPI TEMPLE AS THE TRUST IS A TEMPLE OR WILL BOOK CASH DONATIONS RECEIVED,TO PROPAGATE HINDOO EVIL FILTH

IS THIS IN NATIONAL INTEREST

CASE 3

A TRUST BUYS ELECTORAL BEARER BONDS WORTH 100 CRORES FROM A PERSON, S, AT A 102 CRORES. SO THE TRUST IS OUT OF THE KYC TRAP OF SBI AND SBI HAS NO RECORD OF THE BOND

THE TRUST HAS A BALANCE SHEET OF 1200 CRORES AND BANK FUNDS OF 1000 CRORES,DULY AUDITED.

THE TRUST TRANSFERS IT TO POLITICAL PARTY X

PERSON “ZEE” PAYS 120 CRORES IN CASH TO TRUSTEES OF EXEMPTED TRUST.TRUSTEES HAVE FOR A FEE OF RS 18 CRORES,BOOKED A
DONATION OF RS 100 CRORES

PERSON ZEE IS A BROKER,DRUG DEALER,PIMP, ARMS DEALER ETC.

THE TRUST WILL BRING IN THE CASH OF 100 CRORES INTO THE TRUST VIA AS MANY WAYS AS IT FEELS

OR

THE TRUST WILL DO “ENTRIES OF INCOME” WHERE IT BOOK INCOME AS RENTS ETC, FROM PARTY D OF SAY 100 CRORES,AND THE TRUST WILL BE PAID
A 10% PREMIUM,AS THE TRUST IS TAKING IN INCOME WHICH IT WILL OFFSET WITH THE DONATION TAX LOSS,AND “D” WIL CLAIM A 30% TAX SET OFF
ON THE RENT SO BOOKED

OR

THE TRUST WILL DO “ENTRIES OF INCOME” WHERE IT BOOK INCOME AS DONATIONS RECEIVED ETC, FROM PARTY D OF SAY 10 CRORES,AND THE TRUST WILL PAY “D” A 3-5 % PREMIUM,IN CASH,WHICH IS PAID FROM THE CASH PAID BY “ZEE”ABOVE.THE PERSON “D” WILL GET A TAX OFFSET ON THE DONATION PAID

IS THIS IN NATIONAL INTEREST,dindooohindoo

TRENDING

Vaccine nationalism? Covaxin isn't safe either, perhaps it's worse: Experts

By Rajiv Shah  I was a little awestruck: The news had already spread that Astrazeneca – whose Indian variant Covishield was delivered to nearly 80% of Indian vaccine recipients during the Covid-19 era – has been withdrawn by the manufacturers following the admission by its UK pharma giant that its Covid-19 vector-based vaccine in “rare” instances cause TTS, or “thrombocytopenia thrombosis syndrome”, which lead to the blood to clump and form clots. The vaccine reportedly led to at least 81 deaths in the UK.

'Scientifically flawed': 22 examples of the failure of vaccine passports

By Vratesh Srivastava*   Vaccine passports were introduced in late 2021 in a number of places across the world, with the primary objective of curtailing community spread and inducing "vaccine hesitant" people to get vaccinated, ostensibly to ensure herd immunity. The case for vaccine passports was scientifically flawed and ethically questionable.

'Misleading' ads: Are our celebrities and public figures acting responsibly?

By Deepika* It is imperative for celebrities and public figures to act responsibly while endorsing a consumer product, the Supreme Court said as it recently clamped down on misleading advertisements.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Palm oil industry deceptively using geenwashing to market products

By Athena*  Corporate hypocrisy is a masterclass in manipulation that mostly remains undetected by consumers and citizens. Companies often boast about their environmental and social responsibilities. Yet their actions betray these promises, creating a chasm between their public image and the grim on-the-ground reality. This duplicity and severely erodes public trust and undermines the strong foundations of our society.

No compensation to family, reluctance to file FIR: Manual scavengers' death

By Arun Khote, Sanjeev Kumar*  Recently, there have been four instances of horrifying deaths of sewer/septic tank workers in Uttar Pradesh. On 2 May, 2024, Shobran Yadav, 56, and his son Sushil Yadav, 28, died from suffocation while cleaning a sewer line in Lucknow’s Wazirganj area. In another incident on 3 May 2024, two workers Nooni Mandal, 36 and Kokan Mandal aka Tapan Mandal, 40 were killed while cleaning the septic tank in a house in Noida, Sector 26. The two workers were residents of Malda district of West Bengal and lived in the slum area of Noida Sector 9. 

'Fake encounter': 12 Adivasis killed being dubbed Maoists, says FACAM

Counterview Desk   The civil rights network* Forum Against Corporatization and Militarization (FACAM), even as condemn what it has called "fake encounter" of 12 Adivasi villagers in Gangaloor, has taken strong exception to they being presented by the authorities as Maoists.

India 'not keen' on legally binding global treaty to reduce plastic production

By Rajiv Shah  Even as offering lip-service to the United Nations Environment Agency (UNEA) for the need to curb plastic production, the Government of India appears reluctant in reducing the production of plastic. A senior participant at the UNEP’s fourth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-4), which took place in Ottawa in April last week, told a plastics pollution seminar that India, along with China and Russia, did not want any legally binding agreement for curbing plastic pollution.

Mired in controversy, India's polio jab programme 'led to suffering, misery'

By Vratesh Srivastava*  Following the 1988 World Health Assembly declaration to eradicate polio by the year 2000, to which India was a signatory, India ran intensive pulse polio immunization campaigns since 1995. After 19 years, in 2014, polio was declared officially eradicated in India. India was formally acknowledged by WHO as being free of polio.