Skip to main content

Violent incidents in Haldwani: CPDRS on dubious role of Uttarakhand government

By DN Rath 

Center for Democratic Rights and Secularism (CPDRS) unequivocally condemns the dubious role of Uttarakhand Government and its administration in the incidents that happened in Haldwani of Nanital district of the state.
On 8 February 2024, the local administration of Haldwani carried out a demolition drive and razed down a mosque and a madarasa, the title suit of which is pending in the court. This obviously incited religious fury and frenzy. When people reacted according to their instincts, the administration further punished them by carrying out tyranny in the name of search operations and haphazard arrests. Not only that. The administration isolated the entire Muslim population area from other areas, slapped curfew and closed all the ways of the supply of necessary things, tortured women, children and old age people too.
This series of incidents raises several questions in the mind of civilians:
·       Who authorized the administration to intervene in sub judicious matter?
·       Did the authority done any announcement or given any written or oral notice as per the procedures?
·       Is it that administration was directed to incite religious outcry by targeting particular community?
·       Why the administration did take mentality of such a vengeance towards the citizens?
These and many such other questions are still hovering in the mind of the citizens, of not only Uttarakhand, but the entire country. It seems this is neither mistake nor any excess act of the administration, but an well orchestrated design of polarization in the society. Under the circumstances, CPDRS demands on the behalf of democratic loving citizens of the country:
1.      A Fact finding Committee should be formed to assess the dubious role of administration. It should be headed by no lesser rank than the Retired Judge either of The Supreme Court of India or at the least The High Court.
2.      The responsible officers should be severely punished.
3.      The victims should be duly compensated.
4.      The bull dozed structures should be rehabilitated.
5.      The administration should strive to hold meetings among the local residents and gain their confidence by offering apology and assurances.
CPDRS is of strong opinion that in a democratic country like India, the politics relating to and targeting religion is not at all in the spirit of its Constitution. So, we urge upon the citizens of India not to fall in trap of such divisive forces.

Comments

TRENDING

Planning failures? Mysuru’s traditional water networks decline as city expands

By Prajna Kumaraswamy, Mansee Bal Bhargava   The tropical land–water-scape of India shapes every settlement through lakes, ponds, wetlands, and rivers. Mysuru (Mysore) is a city profoundly shaped by both natural and humanly constructed water systems. For generations, it has carried a collective identity tied to the seasonal rhythms of the monsoon, the life-giving presence of the Cauvery and Kabini rivers , and the intricate network of lakes and ponds that dot the cityscape. Water transcends being merely a resource; it is part of collective memory, embedded in place names, agricultural heritage, and the very land beneath our feet. In an era of rapid urbanization and climate-induced land–water transformations, understanding this profound relationship with the land–water-scape is strategic for sustainability, resilience, and even survival.

Activists Akriti, Satyam Verma face NSA in Noida protest case: PUCL

By A Representative   Human rights activist Kavita Shrivastava has alleged that the Uttar Pradesh Police is invoking the National Security Act (NSA) against two activists associated with Mazdoor Bigul in connection with the Noida workers’ protest case, even as labour unrest continues to spread across industrial belts in several northern states.

Why was this BJP leader forced to call off marriage of his daughter with Muslim boy?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A marriage of two individuals belonging to different faiths was ultimately postponed as the 'champions' of the social morality dominated the discourse and threatened the father of the girl who happened to be the chairman of Pauri city municipality. Yashpal Benam, a BJP leader, posted the invitation of his daughter's wedding with a Muslim boy from Uttar Pradesh. Both the boy and the girl became friend during their B Tech course and were in relationship. There were reports that they already got married in the court but we don't know the reality. Perhaps the family of the girl wanted to send a message of 'acceptability' and 'appreciation' of such a marriage by the society. Invitations were sent to all but soon after it went wide spread on the social media, the champion of Hindu dharma jumped into the fray and started threatening the father. There were hundreds of calls asking the father hundreds of questions about the marriage. What...