Govt of India to "manage" online portals, to have code of conduct, legislation; seeks publication of news, not views

By Our Representative
In a new move amidst what are widely considered as increasing attempts to "manage" the country's media, by the Narendra Modi government is now thinking of coming up with a regulatory framework, if possible a legislation, to control online media, which has seen a sharp spurt in the country ever since it came to power in May 2014.
The move, significantly, comes after several "independent" minded journalists are made to leave the country's top newspapers and TV channels, the latest being Harish Khare, who recently resigned as editor of "The Tribune", following a controversy around a story exposing aadhaar's privacy.
Speaking at the News18 ‘Rising India Summit’ in New Delhi, Smriti Irani, Union information and broadcasting minister, while refusing to give details of her plan, revealed that the Government of India is all set to come up with a "code of conduct" for the digital media.
Complaining that she was concerned about increasing capacity of fake news to “defame” and “demean”, and the tendency of “certain journalists and media personalities” to cross the “very fine line” between "news and views”, she said, it would be obligatory on the part of online "media agencies" to follow this “code of conduct”.
Irani said, she “is already in talks with the concerned stakeholders” on the issue. A top online news portal, “The Wire”, which has lately "disturbed" the powers-that-be with its major exposures, especially on BJP chief Amit Shah’s son allegedly amassing huge sums taking advantage of demonetization, immediately commented, the proposal would open up "a new front in the Modi government’s controversial relationship with the media."
Irani’s remarks were made in response to a question by TV18 political editor Marya Shakil on “a lot of hate, abuse” on social media, asking the minister if she thought the “government can in any way intervene without really crossing its brief”.

Suggesting that the issue requires a balanced and delicate approach, she said replied, while television, radio and newspapers had to adhere to a code, “online is an ecosystem where legislation in terms of news, legislation in terms of broadcast content material, is not very clear. That is something that the ministry is currently undertaking.”
Significance, the demand for a regulatory authority over what has come to known as alternate media has begun following a pleas by what are regarded as pro-establishment media bodies. One of them, Journalists’ Forum Assam (JFA) has, for instance, insisted that this should be done in order to ensure that things are reported in reported in the "right perspective".
According to JFA, online portals are beginning to “pollute” vernacular media, underlining, the latter often consider them as "trustworthy as the established news agencies", republishing things "without verification." A powerful media council, JFA said, would be able to address this kind of flaw "more efficiently."
Meanwhile, Sevanti Ninan, editor of "The Hoot", an established mediawatch website, has been quoted as saying, "News invested with views is not the same as either trolling or fake news, so this is problematic, to put it mildly”, adding, Irani wants "views to be labeled differently from news in a news product on online media, through a code of ethics."
Ninan underlined, “If that is what the ministry is working on, it is a naive concept”, adding, the “distinguish between trolling on social media, fake news, and opinionated news.” And if Irani was referring to news bias, this cannot be "tackled through regulation without affecting freedom of speech.”

Comments

Uma said…

The day is not far off when we will have to take this government's permission for everything we do in our daily lives

March 22, 2018

'Enough evidence' in Indian tradition to support legal basis for same-sex marriage

By Iyce Malhotra, Joseph Mathai, Sandeep Chachra* The ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court on same-sex marriage provides space for much-needed conversations on issues that have hitherto remained “invisible” or engaged with patriarchal locker room humour. We must recognize that people with diverse sexualities and complex gender identities have faced discrimination, stigma and decades of oppression. Their issues have mainly remained buried in dominant social discourse, and many view them with deep insecurities.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Victim of communal violence, Christians in Manipur want Church leadership to speak up

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ* The first eleven days of May 2023 have, in many ways, been a defining period of Indian history! Plenty has happened in a rapid-fire stream of events. Ironically, each one of them are indicators of how crimes and the criminalisation of society has become the ‘new norm’; these include, the May Day rallies with a focus on the four labour codes which are patently against the rights of workers; the U S Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) released its Annual Report on 1 May stating that conditions for religious freedom in India “continued to worsen in 2022”; the continued protest by the Indian women wrestlers at Jantar Mantar for the expulsion of the chief of the Indian Wrestlers Federation on very serious allegations; the Elections in Karnataka on 10 May (with communalism and corruption as the mainstay); the release of the fake, derogative and insensitive film ‘The Kerala Story’; the release of World Free Press Index on 3 May which places India

Polygamy in India "down" in 45 yrs: Muslims' from 5.7 to 2.55%, Hindus' 5.8 to 1.77%, "common" in SCs, STs

By Rajiv Shah Amidst All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) justifying polygamy, saying it “meets social and moral needs and the provision for it stems from concern and sympathy for women”, facts suggest the the practice is down from 5.7 per cent of Muslim families in 1961 to 2.55 per cent in 2006.

India joining US sponsored trade pillar to hurt Indian farmers, 'promote' GM seeds, food

Counterview Desk As many as 32 civil society organisations (CSOs), in a letter to Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal on the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) and India joining the trade pillar, have said that its provisions will allow the US to ensure a more favourable regulatory regime “for enhancing its exports of genetically modified (GM) seeds and GM food”, underlining, it will “significantly hurt the livelihoods of Indian farmers.”

Unlike other revolutionaries, Hindutva icon wrote 5 mercy petitions to British masters

By Shamsul Islam* The Hindutva icon VD Savarkar of the RSS-BJP rulers of India submitted not one, two,or three but five mercy petitions to the British masters! Savarkarites argue: “There are no evidences to prove that Savarkar collaborated with the British for his release from jail. In fact, his appeal for release was a ruse. He was well aware of the political developments outside and wanted to be part of it. So he kept requesting for his release. But the British authorities did not trust him a bit” (YD Phadke, ‘A complex Hero’, "The Indian Expres"s, August 31, 2004)

Modi govt 'wholly untrustworthy' on Covid data, censored criticism on pandemic: Lancet

By Rajiv Shah* One of the world’s most prestigious health journals, brought out from England, has sharply criticised the Narendra Modi government for being “wholly untrustworthy on Covid-19 health data”, stating, the “official government figures place deaths at more than 530 000, while WHO excess death estimates for 2020 and 2021 are near 4·7 million.”

Undermining law, breastfeeding? Businesses 'using' celebrities to promote baby food

By Rajiv Shah* A report prepared by the top child welfare NGO, Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India (BPNI), has identified as many as 15 offenders allegedly violating the Indian baby food law, the Infant Milk Substitutes Feeding Bottles, and Infant Foods (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Act 1992, and Amendment Act 2003 (IMS Act), stating, compliance with the law “seems to be dwindling by the day.”

Delhi demolitions for G-20 summit: Whither sabka saath, sabka vikas?, asks NAPM

By Our Representative Well-known civil rights network, National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), even as expressing solidarity with “thousands of traumatized residents of Tughlakabad and some other bastis in New Delhi whose homes have been demolished and whose lives have been ravaged both prior to as well as in the lead-up to the G-20 Summit”, has said this is in utter disregard to “their minimum well-being and gross violation of their rights.”

Search This Blog