Skip to main content

Modi govt fascist in conduct, unlike Indira Gandhi, who was ruthlessly authoritarian during Emergency: PUCL

JNU students union president Kanhaiya Kumar arrested for sedition
By Our Representative
In an important statement, People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) national president Prof Prabhakar Sinha has accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi of launching an attack and arresting Jawaharlal Nehru University students “on flimsy and ridiculous grounds” as part of his “fascist strategy.”
Posting it as a PUCL’s Facebook post, he wonders, how could “anti-India and pro-Pakistan slogans shouted by a handful of Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) students” pose a “grave threat to the security and integrity of the country?”
The commentary comes a day after Modi talked of existence of a NGO-inspired conspiracy with the help of foreign funds to “destabilize” his government and “defame” him. He was speaking at a rally at Bargarh in Odisha.
Making the pretext of anti-India slogans to arrest students “a typical fascist strategy to give a bad name to the dog before shooting him”, Prof Prabhakar says, “Hitler had arranged to have Parliament house set on fire, and then launched an attack on the opposition and destroyed them holding them responsible for the arson.”
“In the estimation of his government, 50 or 100 anti-India slogan-shouting students pose a grave threat to a nation of 120 crore people with million strong armed forces and larger number of other security forces”, he says.
Drawing a parallel with Indira Gandhi clamping Emergency on June 25-26, 1975 to “protect her throne and put thousands behind the bar”, Prof Sinha says, while she tried to “whip up mass hysteria against her opponents by branding them as fascists, Modi and Co. are trying to do it by branding his opponents as 'anti-national’.”
Pointing towards a “disturbing difference between the emergency and now”, Prof Sinha says, “Indira’s government was ruthlessly authoritarian, but was not fascist. Modi government is not yet authoritarian because it does not have the power of emergency, but it is fascist in its conduct.”
“To throw dust in the eyes of the people, she declared that the country's security was in grave danger”, Prof Sinha says, adding, “Innocent persons were arrested and sent to jail for no fault. Since fundamental right to life and personal liberty was suspended one could not get any relief from the court.”
Prof Sinha was imprisoned during the Emergency period in Bihar. A university teacher at that time, he led a popular movement of teachers and students against the Emergency.
“While Indira Gandhi indulged in character assassination of her opponents and tried to create mass frenzy in the country to protect her Prime Ministership, Narendra Modi is doing it to foist his ideology on the country by misusing the power of the government”, Prof Sinha says.
Referring to Modi’s recent visit to Pakistan “on an informal invite”, Prof Sinha asks how could he have “so much patience and tolerance with an inimical Pakistan” but so intolerant towards “some youngsters shouting pro-Pak slogans, as if they pose a greater threat than ISI and Pakistan-based terrorists.”
“The disproportionate highlighting of the JNU incident as an attack on the nation's integrity and security is nothing but a ploy to attack democracy under the garb of saving national interest”, he adds.

Comments

TRENDING

Noam Chomsky, top scholars ask NRIs to take stand on human rights violations in India

Counterview Desk
Renowned world scholars, including Noam Chomsky, James Petras, Angela Davis, Fredric Jameson, Bruno Latour, Ilan Pappe, Judith Butler, among others, have issued a statement castigating the Narendra Modi government for allegedly creating an environment of fear through arrests, intimidation and violence.

Actionable programme for 2019 polls amidst lynch mobs, caste violence, hate mongering

Counterview Desk
Reclaiming the Republic, a civil rights network, has released a document prepared under the chairmanship of Justice AP Shah (retired) -- and backed, among others, by Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan, bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander, economist Prabhat Patnaik, Right to transparency activist Anjali Bhardwaj and social scientist Yogendra Yadav  (click HERE for full list) -- with the "aim" of putting forth policy and legislative reforms needed to “protect” and “strengthen” the Constitutional safeguards for India’s democratic polity.

India under Modi "promoted" crony business, protected financial fraudsters, fueled bigotry

By Sandeep* and Rahul Pandey**
Narendra Modi's ascension to power was accompanied with jubilation and expectation. His supporters were expecting an end to era of corruption and initiation of good governance which was described as Achche Din. His party's adherence to idea of nationalism was believed to make India a vibrant country and guide India to be a world leader. He gave the slogan of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas' conveying that his government was for all.
Corruption The government system is infested with corruption. A minimum of 10% is siphoned off from government schemes and projects, some of which goes back to political party in power and remaining is pocketed by various administrative, executive and political functionaries. This corruption continues and has increased. Now an additional Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) person working as Official on Special Duty or some equivalent position in every government department also has a share in this booty.
The Narendra M…

Call to support IIM-Bangalore professor, censured for seeking action against Uniliver

Counterview Desk
Sections of the Indian Institute of Managements (IIMs) across India have strongly reacted to the decision to censure Dr Deepak Malghan, a faulty at IIM-Bangalore. Prabhir Vishnu Poruthiyil, who is faculty at IIM-Tiruchirapalli, has sought wider solidarity with Dr Malghan, saying, "The administration has censured Deepak for merely suggesting a meaningful action against Hindustan Unilever for their abysmal environmental record" by “disinviting” it for campus placement.

Inviting Rajapaksa to India "insult" to 1,40,000 Tamils killed by Sri Lankan army

Counterview Desk
In the context of Sri Lankan opposition leader Mahinda Rajapaksa being invited in India, about 75 human rights activists*, claiming to be concerned about rights violations during the civil war in Sri Lanka, especially in 2009, have joined together to express their dissent through a statement.

Modi wants Pak govt be held responsible for JeM terror strike: World doesn't agree

By Sandeep Pandey*
I went to participate in a candle light homage paying event at Dr BR Ambedkar's statue organised by about 200 Dalit students on Hazratganj main crossing in Lucknow on February 16, 2019 evening, two days after the dastardly terrorist act in Pulwana, Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), in which 44 Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) personnel was killed.

Post-advisory, Govt of India appears reluctant to ban e-cigarettes, "harmful" to kids

By Rajiv Shah
Is the Government of India dilly-dallying over the issue of banning e-cigarettes, which have been declared by anti-tobacco activists across the world as providing “an entryway to nicotine addiction”, especially among the kids? It would seem so, if the latest developments are any guide.

A Godse legacy? BJP rulers have "refrained" from calling Gandhi Father of the Nation

By Dr Hari Desai*
What an agony! On one hand, the entire India is celebrating the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the other side, so-called Hindu Mahasabha members have been found mock-enacting the killing of the Mahatma and celebrating the murder by distributing sweets!

No aadhaar, no ration? Hard blow by Gujarat govt on poor and marginalized

By Pankti Jog*
Only those who have aadhaar registration and linked it with ration card will get ration from a Public Distribution System (PDS) shop. This decision of the Gujarat government has hit very badly thousands of poor and marginalized communities of Gujarat, especially during the drought year.

World Bank needs a new perspective on development, not just a new president

By Maju Varghese*
The resignation of the World Bank President Jim Yong Kim was an unexpected development given the fact that he had three more years to complete his tenure. Resignations at such a high level after bidding for a second term is unusual which prompts people to think what would have led to the act itself.