Skip to main content

As Modi man takes over as VP of China-sponsored infrastructure bank, civil society objects to "lack of transparency"

A cartoon on AIIB appearing in "Business Monitor" in 2014
By Our Representative
India’s top civil society organizations have taken strong exception to manner in which India’s membership to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), a multi-national Asian bank founded by the Government of China, was ratified on January 16 “without any public debate”.
The objection comes on the day India chose controversial retired IAS bureaucrat, D Jagatheesa Pandian, former Gujarat chief secretary known to be close to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as AIIB vice-president and chief investment officer of the AIIB.
Pandian served World Bank before returning to Gujarat as head of ex-blue-chip public sector undertaking, Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation (GSPC) in early 2000s, and has been under scanner for having “misled” the state about the hype he created around “unverified” oil-and-gas exploration in KG Basin, leading to heavy losses to the PSU.
India won the post on becoming the second largest investor to the AIIB, enabling it to elect to its 12 member Board of Directors with 10.34 per cent voting rights.
In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the civil society organizations said, “It is unfortunate that the ratification of India’s membership to the Bank was done without a public debate. This deprives the citizens of a platform to raise their concerns and apprehensions about the functioning of the Bank, while the impact of the investments would be borne by the them.”
The letter to Modi has been signed by National Alliance of People’s Movements, National Alliance of People's Movements, Narmada Bachao Andolan, National Fish Workers' Forum, Indian Social Action Forum, International Rivers, Environics Trust, Environment Support Group, among others.
From Gujarat, three NGOs, Paryavaran Mitra, Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti and Machchhimar Adhikar Sangharsh Sangathan signed the letter.
The letter says, India’s ratification without public debate “deprives the citizens of a platform to raise their concerns and apprehensions about the functioning of the Bank, while the impact of the investments would be borne by the them.”
This is particularly serious, India is likely to “receive half of the $1.2 Billion the bank would disburse for infrastructure projects by the end of 2016”, the letter says.
“We are aware that AIIB has promised quick disbursal of funds with ‘high efficiency at low cost’ and takes pride in its ‘lean, green and clean’ policy”, the letter says, underlining, “While the AIIB seems a little too eager to start its investments, the same does not reflect on ensuring a strong set of safeguard policies.”
Pointing out that at present the AIIB is involved in finalizing its Environmental and Social Framework (ESF), the letter says, “This demands a serious debate”, adding, already, the draft has come under criticism for “outsourcing” ESF responsibility to selected clients.
“The need for infrastructure development is one that cannot be discounted in a rapidly growing economy like our country”, the letter insists, adding, “These developmental projects would have the positive impact that the government wishes only when proper safeguards and accountability mechanisms are in place.”
Saying that an accountability mechanism is particularly important for a country like India, the letter says, it alone can take care of the problems of displacement of local people without proper rehabilitation, leading to “serious and irreversible damages to its natural resources.”
Demanding an urgent “open debate both within and outside Parliament on role in and implications for India and ESF”, the letter also wants the Government of India to conduct “face-to-face consultations with the civil society groups.”
The civil society organizations’ objections are similar to the ones raised by the US, which wondered that the AIIB would at all have “high standards of the World Bank and the regional development banks… particularly related to governance, and environmental and social safeguards.”

Comments

TRENDING

Mallika Sarabhai releases speech she was 'not allowed' to give at NID Convocation on Feb 7

Counterview Desk
The National Institute of Design (NID) in Ahmedabad, a Ministry of Commerce and Industry body, landed itself in controversy following its decision to put off its 40th convocation ceremony, where noted danseuse Mallika Sarabhai was invited as chief guest. The ceremony was scheduled to be held on February 7.

Modi, Shah 'forget': Gandhi’s first Satyagraha was against citizenship law of South Africa

By Nachiketa Desai*
Hindu fanatic Nathuram Godse assassinated Mahatma Gandhi once on January 30, 1948 but his followers raising the war cry of ‘Jai Sriram’ are killing the Mahatma every day. In his home state of Gujarat, Gandhiji was killed a thousand times in 2002 when over 2,000 Muslims were butchered, their women raped, homes and shops plundered and set on fire and even unborn babies ripped out of the wombs of their mothers.

As corona virus 'travels' to rural areas, NGO begins training tribals, marginalised women

By Souparno Chatterjee*
The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared corona virus a pandemic. Originating from Wuhan in China, it has traversed the entire globe, almost, and claimed more than 16,000 lives already. That’s largely the urban population. In India, despite all the preparedness and war-like promptness to safeguard against the pandemic, several lives have been lost , and hundreds of individuals have tested positive.

Rani Laxmi Bai, Tatya Tope 'martyred' by East India Company, Scindia's forefathers

By Our Representative
In an email alert to Counterview, well-known political scientist Shamsul Islam has said that was “shameful for any political party in democratic India to keep children of Sindhias in their flock” given their role during the First War of Indian Independence (1857). In a direct commentary on Madhya Pradesh Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia moving over to BJP, Prof Islam has quote from a British gazetteer to prove his point.

COVID-19: Dalit rights bodies regret, no relief plan yet for SCs, STs, marginalized

By Our Representative
In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the National Dalit Watch-National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights, endorsed* by several other Dalit rights organizations, have insisted, the Government of India should particular care of the scheduled castes and tribes, trans folks, persons with disabilities and the women and children from these communities, while fighting against COVID-19 pandemic.

Big 'danger' of NPR: A babu can tag anyone as doubtful citizen, Jharkhand meet told

' By Our Representative
People in large numbers from across Jharkhand gathered at the Raj Bhawan in Ranchi to demand that the Hemant Soren government reject National Population Register (NPR) and stop all NPR-related activities. The people’s organisations which participated in the dharna under the banner of the Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha (JMM) resolved to intensify their struggle, insisting, NPR is not a Hindu-Muslim issue but is essentially anti-poor.

Coronavirus scare ‘pushing’ people from Northeast India into more hardship

By Rishiraj Sinha, Biswanath Sinha*
“No one is born hating another person because of the colour of his skin, or his background or his religion. People learn to hate, and if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.” – Nelson Mandela
***

Gujarat govt plan to 'banish' Gandhian activist anti-democratic, unconstitutional

By Rohit Prajapati*
The current Central and Gujarat governments, and their bureaucracy, have been and are still unable to answer and address the concerns raised, with facts, figures, and constitutional provisions, regarding the terror of tourism in the name of the Statue of Unity and tourism projects surrounding it.

Gujarat construction workers walk home as Rs 2,900 crore welfare fund lies unused

By Our Representative
Situated behind the Gujarat University, some of the families of the migrant construction workers from Dahod and Panchmahals districts of Gujarat, and a few from Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, who had stayed put in make-shift shanties in Ahmedabad’s sprawling GMDC Ground, have begun a long journey, by foot, back to their home villages in the eastern tribal belt of Gujarat.