Skip to main content

High Court questions Banaras varsity decision to prematurely terminate Magsasay award winning academic

By Our Representative
The Allahabad High Court has asked the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Banaras Hindu University (BHU), to explain its controversial decision to prematurely terminate top Gandhian academic and Magsaysay award winner Dr Sandeep Pandey on January 6, 2016. He got the award, called Asian Nobel Prize, in 2002 the emerging leadership category for his grassroots work, taking up human rights issues.
The decision by the IIT-BHU Board of Governors (BoG) had drawn widespread condemnation across the country, and was seen to be not just arbitrary but manifestation of the machinations of the RSS' sway on the everyday functioning of the Ministry for Human Resources Development (MHRD).
Pandey was reportedly called 'anti-national', without providing any opportunity for him to be heard, or giving him a chance to respond or explain. The BoG took cognisance of a complaint by a final year MA political science student, who reportedly never attended classes, allegedly without taking pains to verify the correctness of the allegations leveled against Pandey.
In an statement soon after the termination, Pandey said, “The charges levelled against me are that I am a Naxalite, showed a banned documentary on Nirbhaya case and am also involved in anti-national activities.” He clarified, I'm not a Naxalite. The ideology that I would consider myself closest to is Gandhian.”
At the same time, Pandey said, “I do identify with the causes taken up by Naxalites even though I may not agree with their methods”, adding, “The banned documentary on Nirbhaya made by BBC was to be screened in my development studies class during the even semester of academic year 2014-15 but the decision was withdrawn after intervention of the chief proctor.”
“However”, Pandey added, “A discussion on the issue of violence against women in our society was conducted after screening a different documentary.” As for the charge that he is anti-national, he said, “I do not believe in the idea of a nation or national boundaries. Hence, I cannot be anti or pro-nation. I am pro-people.”
Pandey, who served as visiting faculty in the Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT-BHU, challenged the termination in the writ petition he filed soon after he was handed over the termination order. The matter was taken up by the High Court at Allahabad on February 5, 2016.
Dr Pandey in his petition argued that his removal was an “open abuse” of power on ideological and non-academic grounds and it had its “roots somewhere else”. He added, Vice Chancellor Prof GC Tripathi was “appointed as the Chairman of IIT BoG by the Ministry of HRD, Government of India, bypassing the panel of five names recommended by a BoG resolution.
Referring to the fact that Tripathi, and Dean of Faculty Affairs, IIT-BHU, Prof Dhananjay Pandey, known to be associated with the RSS, who “forced” the decision, Pandy said, there was "no academic consideration in the decision to termininate him, and it was driven by “conflict of ideologies”, hence poses a “threat to the fundamental freedoms granted in the Indian Constitution.”
Pandey said, the decision of the BoG at the instance of the chairman was “a step further to saffronisation of IIT-BHU, and in a “democratic state such an attempt which is aimed at suppressing the ideologies is required to be nipped in bud as otherwise it will have serious effects.”

Comments

TRENDING

Mystery around Gujarat PSU 'transfer' of Rs 250 crore to Canadian firm Karnalyte

By AK Luke, IAS (Retd)*
While returning from a Board meeting of the Oil India Limited (OIL) in Ahmedabad some time in 2012, two officers of the Gujarat State Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd (GSFC), Nanavaty and Patel,  saw me off at the airport. They said they were proceeding to Canada in connection with a project GSFC had entered into with a company there. As we were running late, I hastily wished them the best.

Savarkar in Ahmedabad 'declared' two-nation theory in 1937, Jinnah followed 3 years later

By Our Representative
One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

Indians have made 119 nations their ‘karma bhumi’: US-based Hindu NGO tells Rupani

Counterview Desk
In a stinging letter to Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani, the US-based Hindus for Human Rights (HfHR), referring to the report citing his justification for the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) – that “while Muslims can choose any one of the 150 Islamic countries in the world (for residence), India is the only country for Hindus" – has said, he should remember, Hindus have made several countries, including USA, their home.

J&K continues to be haunted, as parts of India 'degenerate' into quasi-Kashmir situation

By Rajendran Narayanan*, Sandeep Pandey**
“Jab har saans mein bandook dikhe toh baccha kaise bekhauf rahe?” (How can a child be fearless when she sees a gun in every breath?) remarked Anwar, a gardener from Srinagar, when asked about the situation in Kashmir. On November 30, 2019, a walk through an iron gate in a quiet neighbourhood of Srinagar took us inside a public school. It was 11 am when typically every school is abuzz with activity. Not here though.

Tata Mundra's possible closure? Power ministry's 'pressure tactic' on consumer states

By Bharat Patel*
Tata power has announced to the Union Ministry of Power that Tata Power may be forced to stop operating  its imported coal-based Mundra Ultra-Mega Power Project (UMPP) after February, 2020. It is not only unfortunate but also criminal that irreversible damage has been caused to the fragile ecosystem of Mundra coast for a project that will have a running life of only seven years.

What about religious persecution of Dalits, Adivasis, asks anti-CAA meet off Ahmedabad

By Rajiv Shah
A well-attended Dalit rights meet under the banner “14 Pe Charcha” (discussion on Article 14 of the Indian Constitution), alluding to Prime Minister Narendra Modi well-known campaign phrase of the 2014 Parliamentary elections, “chai pe charcha” (discussion over cup of tea), organized off Ahmedabad, has resolved on Wednesday to hold a 14 kilometres-long rally on April 14 to oppose the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), enacted on December 10-11.

Population control? 10% Indian couples want to delay next pregnancy, but fail

Counterview Desk
Shireen Jejeebhoy, director at Aksha Centre for Equity and Wellbeing, previously senior associate at the Population Council, India, argues that the debate on the country's population was fuelled by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day address to the nation, where he drew attention to “concern” about the challenges posed by this ‘exploding’ population growth, needs to centre around the promotion of rights and education, instead of the language of explosion and the threat of coercion that this term implies.

Upendra Baxi on foolish excellence, Indian judges and Consitutional cockroaches

By Rajiv Shah
In a controversial assertion, top legal expert Upendra Baxi has sought to question India's Constitution makers for neglecting human rights and social justice. Addressing an elite audience in Ahmedabad, Prof Baxi said, the constitutional idea of India enunciated by the Constituent Assembly tried to resolve four key conflicting concepts: governance, development, rights and justice.

Kerala governor turned History Congress into political arena, 'insulted' Prof Irfan Habib

Counterview Desk
In a signed statement, office bearers of the Aligarh Society of History and Archaeology (ASHA), Prof Syed Ali Nadeem Rezavi (president), Prof Jabir Raza (vice-president), Prof Manvendra Kumar Pundhir (secretary) and Prof Farhat Hasan (joint secretary), have said that Kerala governor Arif Mohammad Khan had sought to insult veteran historian Prof Irfan Habib, 88, at the 80th session of the Indian History Congress, even as turning it into his “political arena”.