Skip to main content

US-supported study regrets poor state of Indian scientific research vis-a-vis several developing countries

Counterview Desk
A US government-supported study by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), released in its International weekly journal of science, "Nature"", has noted that, despite its massive gains, "India is not yet a major player in world science" and its "publications generate fewer citations on average than do those of other science-focused nations, including other emerging countries such as Brazil and China".
In fact, the journal says, "Relative to its size, India has very few scientists; many Indian-born researchers leave for positions abroad and very few foreign scientists settle in India. The country invests a scant portion of its economy in research and development (R&D), and it produces relatively few patents per capita compared with other nations."
Full of illustrations, the study, "India by the numbers: Highs and lows in the country’s research landscape", by Richard Van Noorden, believes that "Indian science is a study in contrasts", and the situation remains dismal despite the fact that in the recent past its economy has been expanding, and the country has "ramped up scientific production at an impressive rate".
Pointing towards some "bright spots", the study says, "India started the twenty-first century well behind Russia, France, Italy and Canada in terms of yearly publications and it now leads them all by healthy margins" and is "is quickly closing in on Japan". Already, it adds, India boasts "several world-class centres for science education, particularly the highly regarded Indian Institutes of Technology."
Then, it points out, "Businesses in the country are investing more in R&D, which bodes well for future innovation. And more women are participating in science, although their numbers still fall far below those of men."
The study says, "Since 2000, India has almost quadrupled its scholarly output, but that rate is surpassed by Brazil's and China's. India underperforms relative to its gross domestic product (GDP) and population. And its scholarly impact remains low -- in 2013, it was nearly 30 per cent below the world's average."
The study further says, coming to the scientific workforce, India has "only 200,000 full-time researchers (14% of them female) in a population of nearly 1.3 billion." This "ranks "below Chile, Kenyna and many other countries in terms of density of its scientific workforce."
Thus, the country has just just four researchers per 10,000 labour force as against six in Kenya, seven in Chile, 14 in Brazil, 18 in China, 58 in Russia, 79 in UK and 79 in the US.
Coming to patents, the study says, India is "one of the world's leading filters of patents, but it registers far fewer applications per capita than any other top-filling nation." The study, however, claims, the "mutlinational firms in India have boosted the country's rate of filling."
Providing data, the study says, in India 17 domestic and foreign patents applications were filed in 2013, as against 34 in Brazil, 237 in Russia, 541 in Chile, 910 in the US, 2,288 in Germany, 3,716 in Japan, and 4,451 in South Korea.
Coming to research and development investment, the study says, in India it is "languishing at around 0.9 per cent of the GDP, as against China's two per cent. Similarly, spending per researcher in India is 171,000 dollars, which is well below US, Germany, Austria, Italy, Japan, France, South Korea, Brazil and China. It adds, the figures have been "normalized for purchasing power."

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Visually challenged lady seeks appointment with Gujarat CM, is 'unofficially' detained

By Pankti Jog*
It was a usual noon of November 10. I got a phone call on our Right to Information (RTI) helpline No 9924085000 from Ranjanben of Khambhat, narrating her “disgraceful” experience after she had requested for an appointment with Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani. She wanted to meet Rupani, on tour of the Khambhat area in Central Gujarat as part of his Janvikas Jumbesh (Campaign for Development).

Violent 'Ajodhya' campaign in 1840s after British captured Kabul, destroyed Jama Masjid

Counterview Desk  Irfan Ahmad, professor at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany, and author of “Islamism and Democracy in India” (Princeton University Press, 2009), short-listed for the 2011 International Convention of Asian Scholars Book Prize for the best study in Social Sciences, in his "initial thoughts" on the Supreme Court judgment on the Babri-Jam Janmaboomi dispute has said, while order was “lawful”, it was also “awful.”

There may have been Buddhist stupa at Babri site during Gupta period: Archeologist

By Rajiv Shah
A top-notch archeologist, Prof Supriya Varma, who served as an observer during the excavation of the Babri Masjid site in early 2000s along with another archeologist, Jaya Menon, has controversially stated that not only was there "no temple under the Babri Masjid”, if one goes “beyond” the 12th century to 4th to 6th century, i.e. the Gupta period, “there seems to be a Buddhist stupa.”

VHP doesn't represent all Hindus, Sunni Waqf Board all Muslims: NAPM on SC ruling

Counterview Desk
India's top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), even as describing the Supreme Court's Ayodhya judgement unjust, has said, it is an "assault on the secular fabric of the Constitution". In a statement signed by top social workers and activists, NAPM said, "The judgement conveys an impression to Muslims that, despite being equal citizens of the country, their rights are not equal before the law."

Would those charged for illegally demolishing Babri now manage a new Ram temple?

By Fr Cedric Prakash sj*
The long-awaited verdict on the contentious issue of the disputed land in Ayodhya was finally delivered by the Supreme Court on November 9, 2019. The judgement has come after a 70-year-old conflict filled with acrimony, divisiveness, hate and violence between sections of the Hindus and Muslims of the country. At the core of the issue was the Ram Mandir – Babri Masjid dispute: was there a temple on the place where the Masjid was built? To whom should the land be given to?