The 'omitted' reality of India's Transgenders: Where does justice lie for those whom the law neglects?

By Gajanan Khergamker*

In the corridors of justice, the essence of the law frequently clashes with its literal interpretation, particularly when such interpretation undergoes significant transformation. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (Indian Justice Code), which came into effect in July 2024, signifies a considerable transition by abolishing Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. Once regarded as an archaic provision that criminalised same-sex relations, Section 377 evolved over time, through judicial interpretation, into a protective mechanism for individuals on the fringes of society.

The Supreme Court of India, in 2018, ruled Section 377 unconstitutional in cases involving consensual same-sex relationships. This landmark decision marked a vital step toward inclusivity, reflecting India’s acknowledgment of the fundamental rights of the LGBTQ+ community. However, the provision was not entirely eliminated; it continued to serve as an important instrument against sexual violence affecting Trans individuals and male victims, acting as a potent, albeit often unrecognised, safeguard.

With the total removal of Section 377 in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, this essential protective measure has been obliterated, further complicating the already fraught relationship between the trans community and the justice system, while raising crucial questions about the motivations behind such sweeping legal changes.

Under the new code, India’s legal definition of rape has been constricted to apply exclusively to offences involving male offenders and female victims, mirroring the previously repealed Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code. This limited perspective fails to address the harsh realities encountered by trans individuals, who continue to face severe threats of sexual violence. For numerous survivors within the trans community, Section 377 was their sole legal avenue, particularly in a society that often overlooks their trauma—an oversight alarmingly perpetuated by those assigned to protect them.

In its absence, trans victims of sexual assault are relegated to categories such as “grievous hurt,” effectively diminishing the seriousness of their experiences in the eyes of the law, which lessens the punishments for offenders and hampers vital progress towards dignity and respect.

Transgender individuals, officially acknowledged as a “third gender” in 2014, found a glimmer of hope in the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019. However, this law appeared more symbolic than substantial, prescribing a mere two-year prison term for offences against Trans individuals—a penalty far less severe than that for analogous offences against cisgender women.

It was Section 377 that, to some extent, allowed the trans community to pursue justice with greater weight, albeit reluctantly provided and seldom achieved.

The removal of Section 377 also signifies a shift away from inclusive language that recognised the varied victims of sexual crimes. Take, for instance, the case of a Trans woman assaulted in Mumbai’s Bhiwandi, Maharashtra, last year. The police invoked Section 377, treating the crime with the seriousness it warranted. Similar instances have been addressed under Section 377, providing protection to individuals whose suffering might otherwise be neglected and whose trauma had, until recently, been accorded a measure of validity by a legal framework slowly progressing beyond binary definitions.

Today, activists articulate the frustrations of a community left isolated in their quest for justice. Vulnerable to discrimination and disbelief, many Trans individuals encounter ridicule or dismissal when approaching law enforcement, their appeals often trivialised by societal prejudices. According to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), Trans individuals constituted only 0.006 percent of all recorded victims in 2020—a figure so minuscule that it highlights systemic indifference. This statistic does not indicate a lack of violence but rather an institutional failure to acknowledge, document, and address it.

With the elimination of Section 377, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita appears to convey a position that jeopardises the fragile support once extended to the Trans community. A restructured legal framework that overlooks the specific needs of this community undermines their access to legal recourse and representation. Lawmakers may advocate for a more streamlined criminal code, yet this omission raises significant concerns about their sensitivity to the lived realities of marginalised groups. To erase without adequate replacement, to redefine without considering those most affected, is to dilute the very essence of justice for all.

This legal transformation leaves the Trans community grappling with uncertainty, navigating a justice system seemingly determined to overlook their distinct challenges. Their struggle for dignity, equality, and safety remains ever relevant. Yet, as the ink dries on the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, one cannot help but ponder: In an India that professes freedom, where does justice lie for those whom the law neglects? The struggle, it appears, persists—resonating through courtrooms, murmured in police stations, and reverberating through communities where justice remains a fleeting aspiration.

---

*Founder Editor of The Draft. A version of this article first appeared here

Comments

Plastic burning in homes threatens food, water and air across Global South: Study

By Jag Jivan In a groundbreaking study spanning 26 countries across the Global South , researchers have uncovered the widespread and concerning practice of households burning plastic waste as a fuel for cooking, heating, and other domestic needs. The research, published in Nature Communications , reveals that this hazardous method of managing both waste and energy poverty is driven by systemic failures in municipal services and the unaffordability of clean alternatives, posing severe risks to human health and the environment.

Economic superpower’s social failure? Inequality, malnutrition and crisis of India's democracy

By Vikas Meshram India may be celebrated as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, but a closer look at who benefits from that growth tells a starkly different story. The recently released World Inequality Report 2026 lays bare a country sharply divided by wealth, privilege and power. According to the report, nearly 65 percent of India’s total wealth is owned by the richest 10 percent of its population, while the bottom half of the country controls barely 6.4 percent. The top one percent—around 14 million people—holds more than 40 percent, the highest concentration since 1961. Meanwhile, the female labour force participation rate is a dismal 15.7 percent.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

The greatest threat to our food system: The aggressive push for GM crops

By Bharat Dogra Thanks to the courageous resistance of several leading scientists who continue to speak the truth despite increasing pressures from the powerful GM crop and GM food lobby , the many-sided and in some contexts irreversible environmental and health impacts of GM foods and crops, as well as the highly disruptive effects of this technology on farmers, are widely known today.

History, culture and literature of Fatehpur, UP, from where Maulana Hasrat Mohani hailed

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* Maulana Hasrat Mohani was a member of the Constituent Assembly and an extremely important leader of our freedom movement. Born in Unnao district of Uttar Pradesh, Hasrat Mohani's relationship with nearby district of Fatehpur is interesting and not explored much by biographers and historians. Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri has written a book on Maulana Hasrat Mohani and Fatehpur. The book is in Urdu. He has just come out with another important book, 'Hindi kee Pratham Rachna: Chandayan' authored by Mulla Daud Dalmai.' During my recent visit to Fatehpur town, I had an opportunity to meet Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri and recorded a conversation with him on issues of history, culture and literature of Fatehpur. Sharing this conversation here with you. Kindly click this link. --- *Human rights defender. Facebook https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat , X @freetohumanity, Skype @vbrawat

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

Would breaking idols, burning books annihilate caste? Recalling a 1972 Dalit protest

By Rajiv Shah A few days ago, I received an email alert from a veteran human rights leader who has fought many battles in Gujarat for the Dalit cause — both through ground-level campaigns and courtroom struggles. The alert, sent in Gujarati by Valjibhai Patel, who heads the Council for Social Justice, stated: “In 1935, Babasaheb Ambedkar burnt the Manusmriti . In 1972, we broke the idol of Krishna , whom we regarded as the creator of the varna (caste) system.”

'Restructuring' Sahitya Akademi: Is the ‘Gujarat model’ reaching Delhi?

By Prakash N. Shah* A fortnight and a few days have slipped past that grim event. It was as if the wedding preparations were complete and the groom’s face was about to be unveiled behind the ceremonial tinsel. At 3 PM on December 18, a press conference was poised to announce the Sahitya Akademi Awards .

From colonial mercantilism to Hindutva: New book on the making of power in Gujarat

By Rajiv Shah Professor Ghanshyam Shah ’s latest book, “ Caste-Class Hegemony and State Power: A Study of Gujarat Politics ”, published by Routledge , is penned by one of Gujarat ’s most respected chroniclers, drawing on decades of fieldwork in the state. It seeks to dissect how caste and class factors overlap to perpetuate the hegemony of upper strata in an ostensibly democratic polity. The book probes the dominance of two main political parties in Gujarat—the Indian National Congress and the BJP—arguing that both have sustained capitalist growth while reinforcing Brahmanic hierarchies.

Search This Blog