Skip to main content

Can Naxalites re-emerge as a strong force committed to achieving justice in peaceful ways?

By Bharat Dogra* 
The word ‘Naxalites’ has been generally used in routine discussion among common people in India to denote various groups dedicated to the pursuit of justice for the poorest people without having any inhibition regarding use of violent means for achieving their justice based objectives. Now of course several of these groups may disagree strongly with such a simple description as they are very strong on ideological issues (and get very upset if their precise ideological position is stated even in a slightly mistaken way), and what is more, some have actually moved over to parliamentary politics and it may be factually wrong to say that they now use violent means for achieving their justice and equality related objectives. Nevertheless in public perception the word Naxalite is often used for groups firmly dedicated to justice related objectives and not hesitating to use violence for achieving justice related objectives. So here we use the word broadly in this sense to describe several such groups of post-independence India (more specifically roughly the period 1964-2024), and we are not at all referring here to any specific party or group.
Also it should be stated clearly at the outset that it is not at all the objective of this writer to praise or criticize or review these groups. Instead the objective here in this article is a very specific and limited one. This is to explore the question--If it is accepted that it is very important to create an India based on justice, equality, peace and protection of environment, then can the Naxalites make an important contribution to this by remaining deeply committed to their objectives of justice and equality but pursuing these in peaceful, non-violent ways?
It is clear that justice and equality are highly desirable and extremely important from the point of view of reducing human suffering. Economic inequality is at a very high level in India and it has been increasing in recent decades. In the conditions of India it is extremely difficult to meet the basic needs of all people without reducing economic inequalities. In addition to ensure a life of dignity to all it is also very important to reduce social inequalities and injustices. Gender based equality is of course important everywhere.
Naxalites are identified in public mind with their firm commitment to justice and equality. As India really needs justice and equality so Naxalites remain highly relevant to the real needs of the country.
To give a more specific example, land reforms in the simple sense of at least some land becoming available to all rural landless people (apart from protecting the existing land base of small farmers and particularly the tribal communities) is a highly desirable objective but this is being badly neglected today. Naxalites can contribute much to strengthening the struggle for land reforms in India, as land reform has always been a very important program for them.
Opposition to imperialism is a very important part of the overall struggles for creating a better world. This has become even more important in present day world as imperialist wars and arms race threaten to destroy the world while imperialist agenda in very important areas like food and farming threatens livelihoods and health in unprecedented, extremely serious ways. In this context also the Naxalite groups have increasing relevance as their agenda has generally always emphasized opposition of imperialism.
In brief, if reducing the distress of people of India is to be the most important objective, then several aspects of the ideas generally identified with most Naxalite groups continue to be relevant for India.
At the same time it should be stated that violence in everyday life is itself a very important part of human distress and a very important cause of distress. Hence it is very important to move away from thinking based on violence and depending mainly on violence for bringing any change. Violence is associated with dominance and secrecy and both of these tendencies have problems associated with them.
Several other groups also have high commitment to justice and equality, and these objectives are best achieved if Naxalite groups work in cooperation with these groups and with each other. These objectives are best achieved by discussing and working in highly transparent and democratic ways, trying to get the views of as many people as possible in free discussions, instead of imposing the ideas of a few leaders. In the past their violent ways, including indiscriminate violence and internal violence, have created a lot of problems for Naxalites as well as for others, leading often to the loss of life of many innocent people.
Hence the way forward for the Naxalites is to give up the path of violence, dominance and secrecy and to work in non-violent, peaceful, democratic and transparent ways. They should not insist that only we are the great revolutionary force, instead they should learn to work with due humility in cooperation with others who are working for similar objectives.
This will enable the Naxalites to establish a much broader base for their justice based work, and also provide much more continuity and sustainability to this work. They’ll be able to establish many more linkages and to carry out several kinds of highly creative constructive work (nirman) along with their numerous peaceful struggles (sangharsh). We have very inspiring examples of combining these struggles and constructive work from our freedom movement, as well as from some inspiring working class leaders of recent times like Shankar Guha Niyogi.
People tend to look at two streams of the freedom movement as those identified with Mahatma Gandhi and Shahid Bhagat Singh, but as I have argued in a recent book on freedom movement titled ‘When the Two Streams Met’, there were many areas and occasions when the two streams met and contributed to each other, the overall result being that the strength of the freedom movement increased.
The Naxalite groups can re-emerge as a stronger force if they work in non-violent, peaceful, broad-based, democratic and transparent ways. However some persons say that when they keep entirely non-violent, they have to sometimes face very cruel violence from others. Hence they can make one concession that they remain basically peaceful but at the same time they make some preparations for self-defense.
There are some other important matters to which the Naxalite groups need to give more attention. Environment protection has become a very integral part of creating a better and safer world. World peace and disarmament have become in some ways the biggest need of the world, essential for saving the world from the possibility of total ruin. Social reform measures including reducing the consumption of various intoxicants and reducing the role of violence in everyday life are increasingly important for reducing distress. These and other important concerns which did not receive proper attention in the past should now receive adequate attention.
---
*Honorary convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. Recent books: "Protecting Earth for Children", "Planet in Peril", "Earth without Borders", "A Day in 2071"         
                        

Comments

TRENDING

How natural and organic farming can be a key to combating the climate crisis

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  On July 9, while addressing the “Sahkar Samvad” in Ahmedabad with women and workers associated with cooperatives from Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan, Union Home Minister Amit Shah emphasized that natural farming is essential for both our health and the health of the soil. This is a significant statement in the context of addressing the climate change crisis. Natural farming can play a crucial role in combating climate change. Also known as organic farming, it is a system of agriculture that can increase food production without harming the environment. Natural farming has the potential to reduce carbon emissions by 35% to 50%.

100 yrs of RSS as seen by global media house: Power, controversy, push for Hindu-first India

By Rajiv Shah  On a blistering summer evening in Nagpur, nearly a thousand men in brown trousers, white shirts, and black caps stood in formation as a saffron flag was raised, marking a graduation ceremony for Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) workers. This vivid scene, described in a recent FT Weekend Magazine article, “A hundred years after it was founded, India's Hindu-nationalist movement is getting closer to its goal of a Hindu-first state,” captures the enduring presence of the RSS, a century-old Hindu-nationalist organization.

Top US thinktank probe questions ECI's institutional integrity, democratic fairness

By Rajiv Shah   In a comprehensive analysis published in "Indian Politics & Policy" (Vol. 5, No. 1, Summer 2025), a research periodical of the Washington DC-based think tank Policy Studies Organization, author Milan Vaishnav, Senior Fellow and Director, South Asia Programme, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, has raised questions over the fairness of the Election Commission of India (ECI) in conducting Lok Sabha elections. Titled “Assessing the Integrity of India’s 2024 Lok Sabha Elections,” the analysis acquires significance as it precedes recent controversies surrounding the ECI’s move to revise electoral rolls.

Another 'honor' killing in Tamil Nadu: Caste pride has murdered love, again

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Once again, Tamil Nadu has witnessed a brutal so-called 'honor' killing. This time, it is Kevin Selvaganesh, a 27-year-old software engineer from the Scheduled Caste community, who has been hacked to death by the family of the girl he loved since childhood. Kevin, a brilliant student employed at Tata Consultancy Services, was in a relationship with Subashini, his schoolmate and girlfriend. The couple, both well-educated and professionally qualified, had plans to marry. Yet, that love story ended in bloodshed — sacrificed at the altar of caste pride.

Why is India’s cheetah project under fire? Study flags ecological, social, species injustices

  By Rajiv Shah  A recent peer-reviewed study has sharply criticized Project Cheetah—India’s high-profile initiative to reintroduce African cheetahs into the wild—as ethically compromised, scientifically flawed, and socially unjust. Titled “Delineating the Environmental Justice Implications of an Experimental Cheetah Introduction Project in India”, the paper is authored by Yashendu C. Joshi, Stephanie E. Klarmann, and Louise C. de Waal, and was published in  Frontiers in Conservation Science.

The myth of population decline: India’s real challenge is density, not fertility

By N.S. Venkataraman*   India’s population in 2025 stands at approximately 1.4 billion. In 1950, it was 359 million, rising sharply to 1.05 billion by 2000. The population continues to grow and is projected to reach around 1.7 billion by 2050.

Siang dam project sparks debate over security, development, and displacement in Arunachal

By Aarna Gupta*  The proposed Siang Upper Multipurpose Project (SUMP) in Arunachal Pradesh, India, has emerged as a contentious initiative shaped by strategic, environmental, and social concerns. Indian officials, including Union Minister Kiren Rijiju and Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu, have voiced strong support for the project. One of the primary motivations is China’s plan to build a 60,000 MW hydropower dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo River (the upper stretch of the Brahmaputra) in Tibet, which Indian authorities see as a threat to water and national security. In response, the 11,000 MW Siang Dam, with its 9 billion cubic meter reservoir, is viewed as a necessary countermeasure to manage water flow and reduce vulnerability.

Shanghai Textbook reassessed: Between revolutionary rhetoric and economic reality

By Harsh Thakor  "Maoist Economics and the Revolutionary Road to Communism: The Shanghai Textbook on Socialist Political Economy" (1975) presents a detailed exposition of the Chinese perspective on socialist political economy under Mao . Developed during the Cultural Revolution, it outlines a theoretical framework for the functioning of a socialist alternative to capitalism. The book was formulated under the direction of Zhang Chunqiao, who played a central role in discussions, content planning, and final reviews of the draft.

Trump’s tariff tactics are a geopolitical bully move that may backfire

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent move to impose high tariffs on Indian goods is yet another example of his aggressive, unilateralist economic policy—an attempt to pressure and punish rather than to negotiate. This is not an isolated action. Trump has shown similar hostility toward other countries aligned with the BRICS bloc—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—reflecting his disdain for multipolar global cooperation and his desire to maintain American economic supremacy at all costs.