Skip to main content

Will popular, efficient Shailaja, who contrasts Harsh Vardhan, quit CPM, as Gauri Amma?

KK Shialaja, Harsh Vardhan
By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
India's political culture is deeply disappointing and depressing. Even those who wish to counter the BJP and Hindutva suffer from the same mindset and sometimes worse. After 'building' a brand, we sideline some to create our own monopolies. A few days back, one of its greatest Left leaders, KR Gouri Amma, who should have been the chief minister of the state at some point of time, passed away.
Gauri Amma was thoroughly isolated in the party she dedicated her life to, compelling her to leave the party. She hailed from the historically marginalised community of Ezhava which is categorised as OBC in the state, though many social historians suggest that it was actually an untouchable community.
Though current chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan too hails from the same community, Kerala has long been dominated by the Brahmanical caste elite. Right from EMS Namboodiripad, who was Kerala's first chief minister, till EK Nayanar, the longest serving chief minister of Kerala, their position as well as attitude towards Dalits and marginalised remained questionable.
EMS was a proud Brahmin who found a certain 'positive' aspect in the caste system. EK Nayanar would get away with calling a Congress MLA as 'that Harijan' who dances in the tone of AK Antony. Despite her huge mass base and political competence, Gauri Amma remained at the margins of her party. The party's top leadership did not have time to acknowledge her contribution and remained in persistent denial mode that it does not believe in 'identity' politics.
History is repeating in Kerala. The new Pinarayi Vijayan ministry has all the new faces, except for the chief minister. While the CM has a right to introduce the persons of his choice, it is shocking to see that an efficient minister like KK Shailaja, who won from the highest margin in Kerala, over 60,000 votes, did not find a place in the ministry.
If there was one minister whose work has been applauded and acknowledged internationally, it was Shailaja, who as health minister of Kerala, for her handling of the Coronavirus. It became a model state. Though it is also a fact that Kerala has a well-built health infrastructure and that is a historical legacy of the state, yet at this critical juncture Shailaja's handling of the situation got the Left-Democratic Front (LDF) political benefit.
The mandate that LDF got in Kerala is not merely to the leadership of Pinarayi Vijayan but to Shailaja, too. That seems to be the reason why she has been dropped. In these difficult moments, the leadership should have pursued Shailaja as it would have made things much better for the state, but then CPI-M always wanted to 'give' younger leadership a chance, except in its politbureau. In the name of new ministers, the Chief Minister's son-in-law has found a place in the ministry.
Gauri Amma
One may ask this question as to why Shailaja was not included in the ministry. She too hails from Ezhava community and is highly qualified. She proved her worth as health minister of the state. She won with the highest margin. Then why didn't the chief minister include her? Will Shailaja be the new Gauri Amma, who was compelled to leave the party? Was the chief minister feeling threatened with the success of Shailaja.
Look at the supreme irony of India and our political culture. A highly successful health minister does not find a place in the ministry in Kerala while one of the worst health ministers of independent India, whose only job is to retweet PM's statements, is enjoying complete patronage of the government at the Centre.
An absolutely incompetent health minister, Harsh Vardhan enjoys complete faith of his 'leader', while a highly successful health minister Shailaja is ousted for 'performing' so well.
Is there any difference in how the Left and the Right function? Or is it that you are acceptable as long as you don't pose a threat to the 'supreme leader'? Probably, supreme leaders everywhere want dumb ministers, who can be termed as glorified office assistants which reduces them to just defending the government and accusing the opponents.
Shailaja's example makes it abundantly clear that your success in a particular ministry may be the reason for your ouster from the same. It looks like every supreme leader needs a 'Harsh Vardhan' to keep their position unchallenged. In BJP, every achievement belongs to Narendra Modi while failures have to be dealt by the individual minister. That way, blaming Harsh Vardhan for the failure of our efficient handling of the Covid-19 is not correct, it is the PMO which is handling the situation under the Prime Minister.
Can any one then blame the Prime Minister and his babus for the failure in handling the current crisis? No, that is where Harsh Vardhan remains important, as he will face the blame for the failure of the things which he actually never did. Supremos want such netas who can easily give credit to their leaders when they succeed and accept the blame when they fail. Shailaja enjoyed the laurels and media glare making the chief minister a bit uncomfortable while Harsh Vardhan remained completely loyal to his leader.
Even when political manipulations will allow more and more leaders to follow the path of Harsh Vardhan and enjoy patronage, it will really be sad death of democracy if leaders like Shailaja do not speak up when needed. We know all of them follow party guidelines, but it is essential to speak where the party is wrong. To make democracy successful and respects merit and commitment, success of leaders like Shailaja remains extremely important. Will it happen?
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

TRENDING

Why do I lend my support to voices protesting world class renovation of Gandhi Ashram?

By Martin Macwan* One would not expect an activist working on Dalit rights to join such a protest. Dalits carry unhealed trauma that Gandhi caused to Dr BR Ambedkar and the Dalit cause of effective political representation by using violent means of his own definition in the event of the Poona Pact. This apart, Gandhi’s ideas in general, which changed often, on caste were orthodox. I have nothing to add to the subject after the sharpest critique offered by Dr Ambedkar.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Inaccurate gender-relevant data 'spoiling' government policy on Covid social impact

By Simi Mehta*  The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic has been different across vulnerable groups. They were hit by the pandemic at various stages, whether it was accessibility to medical treatment or financial support. The second wave witnessed human suffering at a level where one can never forget the traumatized faces of people due to the inaccessibility and unavailability of essential medical services such as hospitals beds and oxygen. The probability of the third wave has also been one of the major upcoming challenges.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Flamboyant 'demagogues' adjust politics, personality in shadow of democracy

Modi, Erdogan, Bolsonaro By Ajit Singh The terms dictators and demagogues are used interchangeably in various contexts, but there is a difference. The former rule over a totalitarian states where governments are able to exercise complete influence over every aspect of citizens’ life, whereas the latter are a "wannabe dictators" but due to the system of checks and balances they are are not fully capable to create police states.

2002 riots: Gujarat assembly 'misinformed' about dereliction of duty, says ex-DGP

By Rajiv Shah  Former Gujarat topcop RB Sreekumar, an IPS officer of the 1971 batch, has alleged that the Gujarat government gave “totally false information” on the floor of the State Assembly regarding the appeal he made to the Gujarat governor for the “initiation of departmental action against those responsible for culpable negligence in maintenance of public order and investigation of genocidal crimes” during the 2002 riots.

Celebrating birthday amidst image of 'coerced, submissive' India ruled by a strong leader

Pushkar Raj*  As the weeks long birthday festivity of the leadership was being rejoiced India wide, the Covid was still raging in several parts of India. The carnival was in line with the post-Covid decisions and actions of the leadership demonstrating a pursuit of personal power and glory instead of national interest in times of disease and death.

'Devastating impact': Rural workers suffer as Govt of India NREGA budget down by 34%

Counterview Desk  A civil rights group, the NREGA Sangharsh Morcha has sent a letter to the Prime Minister and the Minister of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj stating that 34 per cent decrease in the fiscal budget of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) for year 2021-22 has added to woes on India’s rural population, already suffering from “devastating impact” of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Catholic women warn: Kerala Bishop turning Church into puppet in political games

Counterview Desk A group of Catholic women under the banner Concerned Catholic Women of India has said that they are deeply concerned over "a bishop’s controversial statement" which may threaten communal harmony in India. As many as 89 Catholic women from across India have urged the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of India and its Kerala unit to take special steps to "foster peace and avoid strife."

Odisha bauxite mining project to 'devastate' life of 2,500 Adivasi, Dalit farmers: NAPM

Counterview Desk  While the public hearing on mining in Mali hills has been cancelled due to protests by Adivasi and Dalit farmers of the Mali Parbat Surakhya Samiti, Odisha, who have been protesting against the proposed bauxite mining project, India’s top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) has said it is “deeply concerned” at the decision of the Government of Odisha to push the project in a Schedule-V Adivasi-belt Koraput district against the interests of the people and environment.