Skip to main content

Universal vaccination? At proposed price, single dose will be 'higher' than poverty line

By Bappaditya Mukhopadhyay* 

If we must keep the serious repercussions of the third wave away we absolutely need to treat Covid vaccination as Fun Free, Universal and Now! It is just not ethical, but good economics. It is puzzling as to why the government is contemplating a complicated multi-party negotiation, differential pricing, market intervention in something where market economics will only cause more damage.
To understand this, we must begin with understanding network economics. In network economics, to an individual, the benefit of doing something not only depends upon what he does but also upon how many others are doing the same.
Expecting competition, market forces and prices to take care of demand supply gaps will have little effect in network economics. Vaccinations are perfect examples of network effect-more the individuals around me are vaccinated more effective is my vaccine! So, the decision to get vaccine must be universal because the benefits are universal.
There are two advantages of vaccines. One, it lowers the chances of contracting the virus and two, in the event that one contracts the virus, the effects are milder. Our best bet in keeping the third wave away is to first keep Covid-19 away as much as possible followed by lowering hospitalization instances should one get infected.
Keeping Covid-19 away through social distancing is a tougher task given our stressed economy, major metros with large population densities and many shared resources. Further, as vaccination lowers the chances of hospitalization, it would lower the pressure on the existing health infrastructure; and that directly benefits everyone. Once we accept the logic of universal vaccination, we must now address the possible bottlenecks that could prevent it.
The first and perhaps the most serious bottleneck is the supply itself. As of today, we have administered close to 17 crore vaccines. However, with less than 2.8% of the population receiving the complete dose and less than 10% receiving a single dose, at the current rate of vaccinating 3 million a day, we are well behind the curve.
It is true that initially there was reluctance among many to get vaccinated. Though, to blame the current level of low vaccination rate on the citizens’ reluctance, is misinterpreting the data and running away from solving the problem.
There are around 25 crore Indians (based on 2011 Census) who are above the age group of 45. Given that as of now only 17 crore vaccines have been administered, if everyone eligible in the 45 years+ age group had decided to get vaccinated, then less than 50% of them, would have received vaccination.
There has always been a demand-supply gap and we need to urgently procure vaccines at a rate that is least 10 times more compared to the current rate. We cannot only rely on domestic production. A large chunk must be imported, across Nations and across vaccine manufacturers.
To do this without diplomatic channels and leaving it at the “market forces” is disastrous. For this, it is must that the procurement is the responsibility of the Centre and not allow multiple players to compete, bid and clog the pipeline.
It doesn’t need rocket science to predict that profit-making manufacturers would be more inclined to serve the ones who can pay more
However, there are crucial areas of public private partnership but not in the process of procurement but in manufacturing and administering the vaccines. Nowhere else, certainly not in the process of price setting for the end user should be open to market outcomes. Covid vaccination must be free for all.
The argument of network economics states that end user paying nothing is not subsidy. It is the switching cost. The opportunity cost arising from some of the population not being vaccinated is much higher than the cost any government must be prepared to incur.
Just the GST shortfall for a month of lockdown will be many times over our budget for universal and free vaccination. With the current proposed pricing, at some places the cost for a single dose will be higher than the poverty line itself! Expecting economically stressed households to pay that is beyond any rational belief.
As a result, two things will happen, the rich, who can afford will get vaccinated first, and the poor will be left far behind. One could argue that the vaccine would be free in government hospitals. It doesn’t need rocket science to predict that profit-making manufacturers would be more inclined to serve the ones who can pay more (in this case the private hospitals) than others. Thus, many will be left behind.
The whole exercise will be a waste as the vaccines are only effective when more people are vaccinated! Should the rich pay more? Sure. The government can collect a “vaccine cess” from some of the taxpayers to meet any shortfall, but it must never allow differential pricing so that some get priority over others.
It must be, therefore, be the duty and right of every citizen, for their own good, to demand free vaccine for all- for themselves, their neighbors or anyone they will come in contact with.
---
*Professor at Great Lakes Institute of Management, Gurgaon. His research interests are in the area of Data Analytics and Public Policy

Comments

TRENDING

Grueling summer ahead: Cuttack’s alarming health trends and what they mean for Odisha

By Sudhansu R Das  The preparation to face the summer should begin early in Odisha. People in the state endure long, grueling summer months starting from mid-February and extending until the end of October. This prolonged heat adversely affects productivity, causes deaths and diseases, and impacts agriculture, tourism and the unorganized sector. The social, economic and cultural life of the state remains severely disrupted during the peak heat months.

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra   There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Why India must urgently strengthen its policies for an ageing population

By Bharat Dogra   A quiet but far-reaching demographic transformation is reshaping much of the world. As life expectancy rises and birth rates fall, societies are witnessing a rapid increase in the proportion of older people. This shift has profound implications for public policy, and the need to strengthen frameworks for healthy and secure ageing has never been more urgent. India is among the countries where these pressures will intensify most sharply in the coming decades.

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor*  Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.

School job scam and the future of university degree holders in West Bengal

By Harasankar Adhikari  The school recruitment controversy in West Bengal has emerged as one of the most serious governance challenges in recent years, raising concerns about transparency, institutional accountability, and the broader impact on society. Allegations that school jobs were obtained through irregular means have led to prolonged legal scrutiny, involving both the Calcutta High Court and the Supreme Court of India. In one instance, a panel for high school teacher recruitment was ultimately cancelled after several years of service, following extended judicial proceedings and debate.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...